Assessment of scoliotic deformity using spinous processes: Comparison of different analysis methods of an ultrasonographic system

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 667-677

  Koo, Terry K ^a   Guo, Jing Yi ^a   Ippolito, Christina ^a   Bedle, Jamie C ^a  

^a NEW YORK CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Instrumentation; Safety; Scoliosis; Spine; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ACCUMULATING ANGLE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COBB ANGLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CURVE FITTING; ECHOGRAPHY; FIFTH ORDER POLYNOMIAL FITTING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOCALLY WEIGHTED POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; NERVE ENDING; POSTERIOR DEFORMITY ANGLE; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; ULTRASOUND SCANNER; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER; VERTEBRA; VERTEBRA BODY; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; EVALUATION STUDY; IMAGE PROCESSING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY;

HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, ANATOMIC; SCOLIOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 84923106326     PISSN: 01614754     EISSN: 15326586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis. In: Edward J W, editor. Instructional Course Lectures, 5. Ann Arbor: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1948. p. 261-75.
2. Weiss HR, Negrini S, Rigo M, et al. Indications for conservative management of scoliosis (guidelines). Scoliosis 2006;1:5.
3. Bussieres AE, Taylor JA, Peterson C. Diagnostic imaging practice guidelines for musculoskeletal complaints in adultsan evidence-based approach-part 3: spinal disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008;31:33-88.
4. Saad KR, Colombo AS, Joao SM. Reliability and validity of the photogrammetry for scoliosis evaluation: a cross-sectional prospective study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009;32:423-30.
5. Gadotti IC, Armijo-Olivo S, Silveira A, Magee D. Reliability of the craniocervical posture assessment: visual and angular measurements using photographs and radiographs. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2013;36:619-25.
6. Leroux MA, Zabjek K, Simard G, Badeaux J, Coillard C, Rivard CH. A noninvasive anthropometric technique for measuring kyphosis and lordosis: an application for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:1689-94.
7. Singh DK, Bailey M, Lee R. Biplanar measurement of thoracolumbar curvature in older adults using an electromagnetic tracking device. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:137-42.
8. Ovadia D, Bar-On E, Fragniere B, et al. Radiation-free quantitative assessment of scoliosis: a multi center prospective study. Eur Spine J 2007;16:97-105.
9. Krejci J, Gallo J, Stepanik P, Salinger J. Optimization of the examination posture in spinal curvature assessment. Scoliosis 2012;7:10.
10. Li M, Cheng J, Ying M, et al. Could clinical ultrasound improve the fitting of spinal orthosis for the patients with AIS? Eur Spine J 2012;21:1926-35.
11. Li M, Cheng J, Ying M, et al. Application of 3-D ultrasound in assisting the fitting procedure of spinal orthosis to patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;158:34-7.
12. Magee L. Nonlocal behavior in polynomial regressions. Am Stat 1998;52:20-2.
13. Chao EY, Rim K, Smidt GL, Johnston RC. The application of 4 × 4 matrix method to the correction of the measurements of hip joint rotations. J Biomech 1970;3:459-71.
14. Cleveland W, Devlin SJ. Locally-weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. J Am Stat Assoc 1988;83:596-610.
15. McGraw K, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1996;1:30-46.
16. Thometz JG, Lamdan R, Liu XC, Lyon R. Relationship between Quantec measurement and Cobb angle in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2000;20:512-6.
17. Knott P, Mardjetko S, Nance D, Dunn M. Electromagnetic topographical technique of curve evaluation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:E911-5.
18. Cheung CW, Law SY, Zheng YP. Development of 3-D ultrasound system for assessment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): and system validation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2013;2013:6474-7.
19. Roach JW. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1999;30:353-65.
20. Ungi T, King F, Kempston M, et al. Spinal curvature measurement by tracked ultrasound snapshots. Ultrasound Med Biol 2014;40:447-54.
21. Koivukangas T, Katisko JP, Koivukangas JP. Technical accuracy of optical and the electromagnetic tracking systems. Springerplus 2013;2:90.
22. McKenna C, Wade R, Faria R, et al. EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2012;16:1-188.