Technical accuracy of optical and the electromagnetic tracking systems

SpringerPlus

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-7

  Koivukangas, Tapani ^a   Katisko, Jani P A ^b   Koivukangas, John P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Electromagnetic tracking system; Optical tracking system; Region of surgical interest; Technical accuracy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876553137     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21931801     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-90     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alakuijala J (2001) Algorithms for Modeling Anatomic and Target Volumes in Image-guided Neurosurgery and Radiotherapy. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oulu, Finland. ISBN 951-42-6574-2
2. Beaulieu A, Shepard T, Ellis R (2008) A process control system model for interactive image guided surgery. Proc 2nd SysCon 2008-IEEE Int Sys Conf:1-8
3. Birkenfeller W, Watzinger F, Wanschitz F, Ewers R, Bergmann H (1998) Calibration of tracking systems in a surgical environment, IEEE Trans Med Img 17(5):737-742
4. Chung A, Edwards P, Deliganni F, Yang G-Z (2004) Freehand cocalibration of optical and electromagnetic trackers for navigated bronchoscopy. MIAR 2004. LNCS 3150:320-328
5. de Lambert A, Esneault S, Lucas A, Haigron P, Chinquin P, Magne JL (2012) Electromagnetic tracking for registration and navigation in endovascular aneurysm repair: A phantom study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 43(6):684-9
6. Frantz DD, Wiles AD, Leis S, Kirsch S (2003) Accuracy assessment protocols for electromagnetic tracking systems. Phys Med Biol 48:2241-51
7. Grunert P, Darabi K, Espinosa J, Filippi R (2003) Computer aided navigation in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Rev 26:73-99
8. Haidegger T, Kazandides P, Rudas I, Benyó B, Benyó Z (2010) The Importance of Accuracy Measurement Standards for Computer-Integrated Interventional Systems. EURON GEM Sig Workshop on The Role of Experiments in Robotics Research at IEEE ICRA:1-6
9. Howe R, Matsuoka Y (1999) Robotics for surgery. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 1:211-240
10. Hummel J, Figl M, Birkenfellner W, Bax M, Shahidi R, Maurer C Jr, Bergmann H (2006) Evaluation of a new electromagnetic tracking system using a standardized assessment protocol. Phys Med Biol 51:N205-210
11. Katisko J (2012) Intraoperative imaging guided delineation and location of regions of surgical interest-feasibility study. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oulu, Finland. ISBN ISBN 978-951-42-9751-9
12. Koivukangas T (2012) Methods for determination of the accuracy of surgical guidance devices: A study in the neurosurgical region of surgical interest. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Oulu, Finland. ISBN 978-951-42-9904-9
13. Kroneif G, Ptacek W, Kornfeld M, Fürst M (2012) Evaluation of robotic assistance in neurosurgical applications. J Robotic Surg 6(1):33-39
14. Kücker J, Xu S, Viswanathan A, Shen E, Glossop N, Wood B (2006) Clinical evaluation of electromagnetic tracking for biopsy and radiofrequency ablation guidance. Int J CARS 1:169-187
15. Mascott C (2005) Comparison of magnetic tracking and optical tracking by simultaneous use of two independent frameless stereotactic systems. J Neurosurg 57(4):295-301
16. MAUDE (2012) The Manufacturer and User Facility Experience Database. http://www. accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfMAUDE/search.cfm. Accessed 19 January 2013. Search terms; Product Class: Neurological Stereotactic Instrument, Event Type: Injury. Dates selected: 19. January 2008-19. January 2013
17. NDI Digital (2012) 2012. http://www.ndigital.com/medical/technology-optical. php. Accessed 30 October 2012
18. Ringel F, Ingerl D, Ott S, Meyer B (2009) VarioGuide: a new frameless image, guided stereotactic system-accuracy study and clinical assessment. Neurosurg 64(5 Suppl 2):365-371
19. Ruohonen J, Karhu J (2010) Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Review Clin Neurophys 40:7-17
20. Schicho K, Figl M, Donat M, Birkfellner W, Seemann R, Wagner A, Bergmann H, Ewers R (2005) Stability of miniature electromagnetic tracking systems. Phys Med Biol 50:2089-2098
21. Schneberger M (2004) Infrared optical tracking systems mathematical and operational principles. Lecture: Intra-operative Imaging & Visualization. http://campar.in.tum. de/twiki/pub/Chair/TeachingWs04IOIV/09StereoCameraTracking.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2013
22. Schneider M, Stevens C (2011) Development and testing of a new magnetic-tracking device for image guidance. http://www.ascension-tech.com/docs/3DGDevand% 20testnewMTdeviceforIGATCStevensSPIE2007.pdf. Accessed 11 October2012
23. Simon D (1997) Intra-operative position sensing and tracking devices. Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, CVRMed/MRCAS, Grenoble, France, pp 62-64
24. Stiehl J, Bach J, Heck D (2007) Validation and Metrology in CAOS. In: Stiehl J, Konermann W, Haaker R, DiGioia A 3rd (eds) Navigation and MIS in Orthopecid Surgery. Springer Medizin Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 68-78
25. Vahala E, Ylihautala M, Tuominen J, Schiffbauer H, Katisko J, Yrjänä S, Vaara T, Enholm G, Koivukangas J (2001) Registration in interventional procedures with optical navigator. JMRI 13:93-98
26. Verbakel W, Lagerwaard F, Arjan J, Heukelom S, Slotman B, Cuijpers J (2010) The Accuracy of Frameless Stereotactic Intracranial Radiosurgery. Radiotherapy and Oncology 97:390-394
27. Weng J, Cohen P, Herniou M (1992) Camera calibration with distortion models and accuracy evaluation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal and Mach Intell 14(10):965-990
28. Widmann G, Schullian P, Ortler M, Bale R (2012) Frameless stereotactic targeting devices: technical features, targeting errors and clinical results. IJCARS 8:1-16
29. Wiles A, Thompson D, Frantz D (2004) Accuracy assessment and interpretation for optical tracking systems. In: Galloway R (ed) Medical Imaging 2004: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Display. Proc. SPIE, pp 421-432, 5367
30. Wittmann W, Wenger T, Loewe E, Lueth TC (2011) Official measurement protocol and accuracy results for an optical surgical navigation system (NPU). Proc. 33rd Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE EMBS, Boston, MA, USA, pp 1237-1240
31. Zoppi M, Khan M, Schäfer F & Molfino R (2010) Toward lean minimally invasive robotic surgery. Robotica 28:185-197