From network analysis to risk analysis-An approach to risk-based surveillance for bovine tuberculosis in Minnesota, US

Preventive Veterinary Medicine

Volumn 118, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 328-340

  Ribeiro Lima, J ^a   Enns, E A ^b   Thompson, B ^c   Craft, M E ^a   Wells, S J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c Minnesota Board of Animal Health   (United States)

Author keywords

Bovine tuberculosis; Cattle movements; Network analysis; Targeted surveillance

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; BOS; BOVINAE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; BOVINE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; MINNESOTA; PROCEDURES; RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION DEVICE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SENTINEL SURVEILLANCE; SOCIAL NETWORK; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT; TUBERCULOSIS, BOVINE; VETERINARY;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; CATTLE; COMMERCE; MINNESOTA; RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION DEVICE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SENTINEL SURVEILLANCE; SOCIAL NETWORKING; TRANSPORTATION; TUBERCULOSIS, BOVINE;

EID: 84923092797     PISSN: 01675877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bessell P.R., Orton R., White P.C.L., Hutchings M.R., Kao R.R. Risk factors for bovine tuberculosis at the national level in Great Britain. BMC Vet. Res. 2012, 8:51.
2. Bigras-Poulin M., Thompson R.A., Chriel M., Mortensen S., Greiner M. Network analysis of Danish cattle industry trade patterns as an evaluation of risk potential for disease spread. Prev. Vet. Med. 2006, 76:11-39.
3. Bonacich P. Power and centrality: a family of measures. Am. J. Sociol. 1987, 92:1170-1182.
4. Bonacich P. Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Soc. Netw. 2007, 29:555-564.
5. Borgatti S.P. Centrality and network flow. Soc. Netw. 2005, 27:55-71.
6. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., Freeman L.C. UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis 2002.
7. Carstensen M., Doncarlos M.W. Preventing the establishment of a wildlife disease reservoir: a case study of bovine tuberculosis in wild deer in Minnesota, USA. Vet. Med. Int. 2011, 2011:413240.
8. Dubé C., Ribble C., Kelton D. An analysis of the movement of dairy cattle through 2 large livestock markets in the province of Ontario, Canada. Can. Vet. J. 2010, 51:1254-1260.
9. Dubé C., Ribble C., Kelton D., McNab B. Comparing network analysis measures to determine potential epidemic size of highly contagious exotic diseases in fragmented monthly networks of dairy cattle movements in Ontario, Canada. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2008, 55:382-392.
10. Dubé C., Ribble C., Kelton D., McNab B. A review of network analysis terminology and its application to foot-and-mouth disease modelling and policy development. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2009, 56:73-85.
11. Ferguson N.M., Donnelly C.A., Anderson R.M. The foot-and-mouth epidemic in Great Britain: pattern of spread and impact of interventions. Science 2001, 292:1155-1160.
12. Fischer E.A.J., van Roermund H.J.W., Hemerik L., van Asseldonk M.a.P.M., de Jong M.C.M. Evaluation of surveillance strategies for bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) using an individual based epidemiological model. Prev. Vet. Med. 2005, 67:283-301.
13. Freeman L.C., Borgatti S.P., White D.R. Centrality in valued graphs: a measure of betweenness based on network flow. Soc. Netw. 1991, 13:141-154.
14. Frössling J., Ohlson A., Björkman C., Håkansson N., Nöremark M. Application of network analysis parameters in risk-based surveillance - examples based on cattle trade data and bovine infections in Sweden. Prev. Vet. Med. 2012, 105:202-208.
15. Gibbens J.C., Sharpe C.E., Wilesmith J.W., Mansley L.M., Michalopoulou E., Ryan J.B., Hudson M. Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: the first five months. Vet. Rec. 2001, 149:729-743.
16. Gilbert M., Mitchell A., Bourn D., Mawdsley J., Clifton-Hadley R., Wint W. Cattle movements and bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain. Nature 2005, 435:491-496.
17. Goodchild A.V., Clifton-Hadley R.S. Cattle to cattle transmission of Mycobacterium bovis. Tuberculosis 2001, 81:23-41.
18. Gopal R., Goodchild A., Hewinson G., Domenech R.D.R. Introduction of bovine tuberculosis to north-east England by bought-in cattle. Vet. Rec. 2006, 165-271.
19. Haydon D.T., Cleaveland S., Taylor L.H., Laurenson M.K. Identifying reservoirs of infection: a conceptual and practical challenge. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002, 8:1468-1473.
20. Johnston W.T., Gettinby G., Cox D.R., Donnelly C.A., Bourne J., Clifton-Hadley R., Le Fevre A.M., McInerney J.P., Mitchell A., Morrison W.I., Woodroffe R. Herd-level risk factors associated with tuberculosis breakdowns among cattle herds in England before the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic. Biol. Lett. 2005, 1:53-56.
21. Keeling M.J., Eames K.T.D. Networks and epidemic models. J. R. Soc. Interface 2005, 2:295-307.
22. Knust B.M., Wolf P.C., Wells S.J. Characterization of the risk of deer-cattle interactions in Minnesota by use of an on-farm environmental assessment tool. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2011, 72:924-931.
23. Mansley L.M., Dunlop P.J., Whiteside S.M., Smith R.G.H. Early dissemination of foot-and-mouth disease virus through sheep marketing in February 2001. Vet. Rec. 2003, 153:43-50.
24. Marangon S., Martini M., Dalla Pozza M., Neto F. A case-control study on bovine tuberculosis in the Veneto Region (Italy). Prev. Vet. Med. 1998, 34:87-95.
25. Martínez-López B., Perez A.M., Sánchez-Vizcaíno J.M. Social network analysis. Review of general concepts and use in preventive veterinary medicine. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2009, 56:109-120.
26. Mclaws M., Ribble C. Description of recent foot and mouth disease outbreaks in nonendemic areas: exploring the relationship between early detection and epidemic size. Can. Vet. J. 2007, 48:1051-1062.
27. Miller R.S., Sweeney S.J. Mycobacterium bovis (bovine tuberculosis) infection in North American wildlife: current status and opportunities for mitigation of risks of further infection in wildlife populations. Epidemiol. Infect. 2013, 1-14.
28. Mintiens K., Méroc E., Faes C., Abrahantes J.C., Hendrickx G., Staubach C., Gerbier G., Elbers A.R.W., Aerts M., De Clercq K. Impact of human interventions on the spread of bluetongue virus serotype 8 during the 2006 epidemic in north-western Europe. Prev. Vet. Med. 2008, 87:145-161.
29. Munroe F.A., Dohoo I.R., McNab W.B., Spangler L. Risk factors for the between-herd spread of Mycobacterium bovis in Canadian cattle and cervids between 1985 and 1994. Prev. Vet. Med. 1999, 41:119-133.
30. Natale F., Giovannini A., Savini L., Palma D., Possenti L., Fiore G., Calistri P. Network analysis of Italian cattle trade patterns and evaluation of risks for potential disease spread. Prev. Vet. Med. 2009, 92:341-350.
31. Livestock Disease Eradication: Evaluation of the Cooperative State-Federal Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program 1994, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
32. Newman M. Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Phys. Rev. E 2001, 64:1-4.
33. Nöremark M., Håkansson N., Lewerin S.S., Lindberg A., Jonsson A. Network analysis of cattle and pig movements in Sweden: measures relevant for disease control and risk based surveillance. Prev. Vet. Med. 2011, 99:78-90.
34. OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code 2012.
35. Pastor-Satorras R., Vespignani A. Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86:3200-3203.
36. Ramírez-Villaescusa A.M., Medley G.F., Mason S., Green L.E. Risk factors for herd breakdown with bovine tuberculosis in 148 cattle herds in the south west of England. Prev. Vet. Med. 2010, 95:224-230.
37. Reilly L.A., Courtenay O. Husbandry practices, badger sett density and habitat composition as risk factors for transient and persistent bovine tuberculosis on UK cattle farms. Prev. Vet. Med. 2007, 80:129-142.
38. Robinson S.E., Christley R.M. Exploring the role of auction markets in cattle movements within Great Britain. Prev. Vet. Med. 2007, 81:21-37.
39. Shaw S.L. Public Health Implications of Surveillance Programs for Zoonotic Pathogens: A Case Study of Mycobacterium bovis in the State of Minnesota 2008, University of Minnesota.
40. Stärk K.D.C., Regula G., Hernandez J., Knopf L., Fuchs K., Morris R.S., Davies P. Concepts for risk-based surveillance in the field of veterinary medicine and veterinary public health: review of current approaches. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2006, 6:20.
41. USDA-APHIS USDA Uniform Methods and Rules for the Bovine Tuberculosis eradication. United States 2005.
42. USDA-APHIS-VS Analysis of Bovine Tuberculosis Surveillance in Accredited Free States, Tuberculosis. Fort Collins, CO 2009.
43. USDA-APHIS-VS Assessment of Pathways for the Introduction and Spread of Mycobacterium bovis in the United States. Fort Collins, CO 2009.
44. USDA-APHIS-VS A New Approach for Managing Bovine Tuberculosis: Veterinary Services - Proposed Action Plan. Fort Collins, CO 2009.
45. Volkova V.V., Howey R., Savill N.J., Woolhouse M.E.J. Sheep movement networks and the transmission of infectious diseases. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e11185.
46. Vose D. Risk Analysis: Quantitative Guide 2008, Wiley & Sons, Incorporated/John, West Sussex, UK. 3rd ed.
47. Wasserman S., Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications 1994, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. 1st ed.
48. Woolhouse M.E.J., Shaw D.J., Matthews L., Liu W.-C., Mellor D.J., Thomas M.R. Epidemiological implications of the contact network structure for cattle farms and the 20-80 rule. Biol. Lett. 2005, 1:350-352.