Meta-analysis of complication rates for single-loop versus dual-loop (Roux-en-Y) with isolated pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Klaiber, U ^a   Probst, P ^a   Knebel, P ^a   Contin, P ^a   Diener, M K ^a   Buchler M W ^a   Hackert, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECTS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; META ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC FISTULA; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; REOPERATION; ROUX Y ANASTOMOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANASTOMOSIS, ROUX-EN-Y; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC FISTULA; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84923072616     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9703     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, Seiler CA, Friess H, Büchler MW. Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 586-594.
2. Schnelldorfer T, Ware AL, Sarr MG, Smyrk TC, Zhang L, Qin R et al. Long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is cure possible? Ann Surg 2008; 247: 456-462.
3. Hartwig W, Werner J, Jager D, Debus J, Buchler MW. Improvement of surgical results for pancreatic cancer. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: e476-e485.
4. Harnoss JC, Ulrich AB, Harnoss JM, Diener MK, Buchler MW, Welsch T. Use and results of consensus definitions in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 2014; 155: 47-57.
5. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138: 8-13.
6. Hackert T, Werner J, Büchler MW. Postoperative pancreatic fistula. Surgeon 2011; 9: 211-207.
7. Pratt WB, Maithel SK, Vanounou T, Huang ZS, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr. Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme. Ann Surg 2007; 245: 443-451.
8. Chen YJ, Lai EC, Lau WY, Chen XP. Enteric reconstruction of pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a review of the literature. Int J Surg 2014; 12: 706-711.
9. Machado MC, da Cunha JE, Bacchella T, Bove P. A modified technique for the reconstruction of the alimentary tract after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1976; 143: 271-272.
10. Nakamura T, Okada A, Higaki J, Tojo H, Okamoto M. Pancreaticobiliary maljunction-associated pancreatitis: an experimental study on the activation of pancreatic phospholipase A2. World J Surg 1996; 20: 543-550.
11. Papadimitriou JD, Fotopoulos AC, Smyrniotis B, Prahalias AA, Kostopanagiotou G, Papadimitriou LJ. Subtotal pancreatoduodenectomy: use of a defunctionalized loop for pancreatic stump drainage. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 135-139.
12. Kingsnorth AN. Safety and function of isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy after Whipple's pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1994; 76: 175-179.
13. Albertson DA. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with reconstruction by Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy: no operative mortality in a series of 25 cases. South Med J 1994; 87: 197-201.
14. Khan AW, Agarwal AK, Davidson BR. Isolated Roux loop duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy avoids pancreatic leaks in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 2002; 19: 199-204.
15. Sutton CD, Garcea G, White SA, O'Leary E, Marshall LJ, Berry DP et al. Isolated Roux-loop pancreaticojejunostomy: a series of 61 patients with zero postoperative pancreaticoenteric leaks. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8: 701-705.
16. Hackert T, Buchler MW. Randomized clinical trial of isolated Roux-en-Y versus conventional reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy (Br J Surg 2014; 101: 1084-1091). Br J Surg 2014; 101: 1092 (Letter).
17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Med 2009; 6: e1000097.
18. Diener MK, Simon T, Buchler MW, Seiler CM. Surgical evaluation and knowledge transfer - methods of clinical research in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2012; 397: 1193-1199.
19. Doerr-Harim C, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Knebel P. Insights into surgical trials: methodological challenges and solutions. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2014; 399: 273-278.
20. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org [accessed 20 June 2014].
21. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52: 377-384.
22. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188.
23. Trikalinos TA, Balion CM, Coleman CI, Griffith L, Santaguida PL, Vandermeer B et al. Chapter 8: Meta-analysis of test performance when there is a 'gold standard'. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27(Suppl 1): S56-S66.
24. Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Stat Med 2001; 20: 641-654.
25. Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S, Okada KI, Miyazawa M, Shimizu A et al. Randomized clinical trial of isolated Roux-en-Y versus conventional reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 1084-1091.
26. Ke S, Ding XM, Gao J, Zhao AM, Deng GY, Ma RL et al. A prospective, randomized trial of Roux-en-Y reconstruction with isolated pancreatic drainage versus conventional loop reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 2013; 153: 743-752.
27. El Nakeeb A, Hamdy E, Sultan AM, Salah T, Askr W, Ezzat H et al. Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study. HPB 2014; 16: 713-722.
28. Ballas K, Symeonidis N, Rafailidis S, Pavlidis T, Marakis G, Mavroudis N et al. Use of isolated Roux loop for pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 3178-3182.
29. Kaman L, Sanyal S, Behera A, Singh R, Katariya RN. Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy vs single loop pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Int J Surg 2008; 6: 306-310.
30. Casadei R, Zanini N, Pezzilli R, Calculli L, Ricci C, Antonacci N et al. Reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: isolated Roux loop pancreatic anastomosis. Chir Ital 2008; 60: 641-649.
31. Perwaiz A, Singhal D, Singh A, Chaudhary A. Is isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy superior to conventional reconstruction in pancreaticoduodenectomy? HPB 2009; 11: 326-331.
32. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 580-588.
33. Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G et al. Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 1514-1522.
34. Fragulidis GP, Arkadopoulos N, Vassiliou I, Marinis A, Theodosopoulos T, Stafyla V et al. Pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the impact of the isolated jejunal loop length and anastomotic technique of the pancreatic stump. Pancreas 2009; 38: e177-e182.