A prospective, randomized trial of Roux-en-Y reconstruction with isolated pancreatic drainage versus conventional loop reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Surgery (United States)

Volumn 153, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 743-752

  Ke, Shan ^a   Ding, Xue Mei ^a   Gao, Jun ^a   Zhao, Ai Min ^b   Deng, Gao Yue ^c   Ma, Rui Liang ^d   Xin, Zong Hai ^e   Ning, Chun Min ^f   Sun, Wen Bing ^a  

^a CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c The 305 Hospital of Chinese PLA   (China)

^d Chinese PLA 254 Hospital   (China)

^e Department of General Surgery   (China)

^f Chaoyang Central Hospital   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; CHINA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL LOOP RECONSTRUCTION; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; DUODENUM DISEASE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISOLATED PANCREATIC DRAINAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREAS SURGERY; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROUX Y ANASTOMOSIS; SURGICAL DRAINAGE;

AGED; ANASTOMOSIS, ROUX-EN-Y; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; CHINA; DRAINAGE; DUODENAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC FISTULA; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84878020032     PISSN: 00396060     EISSN: 15327361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. M. Kawai, and H. Yamaue Analysis of clinical trials evaluating complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a new era of pancreatic surgery Surg Today 40 2010 1011 1017
2. J.M. Winter, J.L. Cameron, K.A. Campbell, M.A. Arnold, D.C. Chang, and J. Coleman 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience J Gastrointest Surg 10 2006 1199 1210
3. S.R. Grobmyer, F.M. Pieracci, P.J. Allen, M.F. Brennan, and D.P. Jaques Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system J Am Coll Surg 204 2007 356 364
4. C.J. Yeo, J.L. Cameron, M.M. Maher, P.K. Sauter, M.L. Zahurak, and M.A. Talamini A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy Ann Surg 222 1995 580 588
5. G.V. Aranha, J.M. Aaron, M. Shoup, and J. Pickleman Current management of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy Surgery 140 2006 561 568
6. L. Kaman, S. Sanyal, A. Behera, R. Singh, and R.N. Katariya Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy vs single loop pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy Int J Surg 6 2008 306 310
7. W. Sun, X. Feng, F. Zhang, B. Han, and J. Cai A pathophysiological evaluation of the digestive tract reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a new and interesting option for the reconstruction of the digestive tract Chin J Hepatobiliary Surg 4 1998 400 401
8. A.C. Berger, T.J. Howard, E.P. Kennedy, P.K. Sauter, M. Bower-Cherry, and S. Dutkevitch Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial J Am Coll Surg 208 2009 738 747
9. C. Bassi, C. Dervenis, G. Butturini, A. Fingerhut, C. Yeo, and J. Izbicki Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition Surgery 138 2005 8 13
10. W.B. Pratt, S.K. Maithel, T. Vanounou, Z.S. Huang, M.P. Callery, and C.M. Vollmer Jr. Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme Ann Surg 245 2007 443 451
11. J.H. Balcom, D.W. Rattner, A.L. Warshaw, Y. Chang, and C. Fernandez-del Castillo Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization Arch Surg 136 2001 391 398
12. A. Mathur, H.A. Pitt, M. Marine, R. Saxena, C.M. Schmidt, and T.J. Howard Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula Ann Surg 246 2007 1058 1064
13. A. Kleespies, M. Albertsmeier, F. Obeidat, H. Seeliger, K.W. Jauch, and C.J. Bruns The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis Langenbecks Arch Surg 393 2008 459 471
14. S.B. Choi, J.S. Lee, W.B. Kim, T.J. Song, S.O. Suh, and S.Y. Choi Efficacy of the omental roll-up technique in pancreaticojejunostomy as a strategy to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy Arch Surg 147 2012 145 150
15. M.C. Machado, J.E. da Cunha, T. Bacchella, and P. Bove A modified technique for the reconstruction of the alimentary tract after pancreatoduodenectomy Surg Gynecol Obstet 143 1976 271 272
16. J.D. Papadimitriou, A.C. Fotopoulos, B. Smyrniotis, A.A. Prahalias, G. Kostopanagiotou, and L.J. Papadimitriou Subtotal pancreatoduodenectomy: use of a defunctionalized loop for pancreatic stump drainage Arch Surg 134 1999 135 139
17. A.N. Kingsnorth Safety and function of isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy after Whipple's pancreaticoduodenectomy Ann R Coll Surg Engl 76 1994 175 179
18. S.R. Grobmyer, S.T. Hollenbeck, D.P. Jaques, W.R. Jarnagin, R. DeMatteo, and D.G. Coit Roux-en-Y reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy Arch Surg 143 2008 1184 1188
19. K. Ballas, N. Symeonidis, S. Rafailidis, T. Pavlidis, G. Marakis, and N. Mavroudis Use of isolated Roux loop for pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy World J Gastroenterol 16 2010 3178 3182
20. J.M. Funovics, G. Zoch, E. Wenzl, and F. Schulz Progress in reconstruction after resection of the head of the pancreas Surg Gynecol Obstet 164 1987 545 548
21. N. Oneil Machado Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: definitions, risk factors, preventive measures, and management-review Int J Surg Oncol 2012 2012 602478
22. R.D. Tolin, L.S. Malmud, F. Stelzer, R. Menin, P.T. Makler Jr., and G. Applegate Enterogastric reflux in normal subjects and patients with Bilroth II gastroenterostomy. Measurement of enterogastric reflux Gastroenterology 77 1979 1027 1033
23. H. Natomi, K. Sugano, M. Iwamori, F. Takaku, and Y. Nagai Region-specific distribution of glycosphingolipids in the rabbit gastrointestinal tract: preferential enrichment of sulfoglycolipids in the mucosal regions exposed to acid Biochim Biophys Acta 961 1988 213 222
24. Y. Hoya, N. Mitsumori, and K. Yanaga The advantages and disadvantages of a Roux-en-Y reconstruction after a distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer Surg Today 39 2009 647 651
25. A. Csendes, A.M. Burgos, G. Smok, P. Burdiles, I. Braghetto, and J.C. Diaz Latest results (12-21 years) of a prospective randomized study comparing Billroth II and Roux-en-Y anastomosis after a partial gastrectomy plus vagotomy in patients with duodenal ulcers Ann Surg 249 2009 189 194
26. J.M. Wu, M.K. Tsai, R.H. Hu, K.J. Chang, P.H. Lee, and Y.W. Tien Reflux esophagitis and marginal ulcer after pancreaticoduodenectomy J Gastrointest Surg 15 2011 824 828
27. D. Fuks, G. Piessen, E. Huet, M. Tavernier, P. Zerbib, and F. Michot Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors Am J Surg 197 2009 702 709
28. B.W. Miedema, M.G. Sarr, J.A. van Heerden, D.M. Nagorney, D.C. McIlrath, and D. Ilstrup Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Current management Arch Surg 127 1992 945 949
29. J.P. Lerut, P.R. Gianello, J.B. Otte, and P.J. Kestens Pancreaticoduodenal resection. Surgical experience and evaluation of risk factors in 103 patients Ann Surg 199 1984 432 437