Scenarios for a 2 °C world: a trade-linked input–output model with high sector detail

Climate Policy

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 301-317

  De Koning, Arjan ^a   Huppes, Gjalt ^a   Deetman, Sebastiaan ^a   Tukker, Arnold ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

scenario; supply use tables; technology development

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ECONOMIC IMPACT; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; RESOURCE USE; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TRADE-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS; UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 84923008584     PISSN: 14693062     EISSN: 17527457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2014.999224     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. R.Andrew,, G.P.Peters,, & J.Lennox, (2009). Approximation and regional aggregation in multi-regional input–output analysis for national carbon footprint accounting. Economic Systems Research, 21, 311–335. doi:10.1080/09535310903541751
2. M.C.Bouwmeester, (2014). Economics and environment – Modelling global linkages (PhD thesis). University of Groningen, Groningen. ISBN 978-90367-7076-7. Retrieved from http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/376969830
3. S.Cantono,, R.Heijungs,, & R.Kleijn, (2008). Environmental accounting of eco-innovations through environmental input–output analysis: The case of hydrogen and fuel cell buses. Economic Systems Research, 20, 303–318. doi:10.1080/09535310802346351
4. S.Chen,, & W.Ravallion, (2004). How have the world's poorest fared since the early 1980s? The World Bank Research Observer, 19, 141–169. doi:10.1093/wbro/lkh020
5. L.Clarke,, J.Edmonds,, H.Jacoby,, H.Pitcher,, J.Reilly,, & R.Richels, (2007). Scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric concentrations (Sub-report 2.1A of Synthesis and Assessment Product 2.1 by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research). Washington, DC: Department of Energy, Office of Biological & Environmental Research.
6. V.Daioglou,, B.J.van Ruijven,, & D.P.van Vuuren, (2012). Model projections for household energy use in developing countries. Energy, 37, 601–615. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.10.044
7. DECC. (2013). Energy consumption in the United Kingdom. Department of Energy & Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/collection/energy-consumption-in-the-uk
8. E.Dietzenbacher,, B.Los,, R.Stehrer,, M.Timmer,, & G.de Vries, (2013). The construction of world input–output tables in the WIOD project. Economic Systems Research, 25, 71–98. doi:10.1080/09535314.2012.761180
9. F.Duchin, (1998). Structural economics: Measuring change in technology, lifestyles, and the environment. The Center for Resource Economics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 1-55963-606-8
10. J.W.Eaton,, D.Bateman,, S.Hauberg,, & R.Wehbring, (2011). GNU Octave, a high-level interactivelanguage for numerical computations (Edition 3 for Octave version 3.8.0). Retrieved from www.gnu.org/software/octave/
11. EC. (2013). European competitiveness report 2013 – Towards knowledge driven reindustrialisation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
12. O.Edenhofer,, C.Carraro,, J.-C.Hourcade,, K.Neuhoff,, G.Luderer,, C.Flachsland,, A.… Türk, (2009). The economics of decarbonization (Report of the RECIPE Project). Potsdam: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
13. EPA. (2000). Energy cost and IAQ performance of ventilation systems and controls. Washington: Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
14. EPA. (2010). Available and emerging technologies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the Portland cement industry. Triangle Park, North Carolina: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research.
15. EPA. (2012). Available and emerging technologies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the iron and steel industry. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
16. Eurostat. (2008). Eurostat manual of supply, use and input–output tables. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European communities. ISBN 978-92-79-04735-0, ISSN 1977-0375.
17. J.Fargione,, J.Hill,, D.Tilman,, S.Polasky,, & P.Hawthorne, (2008). Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science, 319, 1235–1238. doi:10.1126/science.1152747
18. 2 removal in the iron and steel industry. Energy Conversion and Management, 44, 1027–1037. doi:10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00111-5
19. B.Girod,, D.P.van Vuuren,, & S.Deetman, (2012). Global travel within the 2 °C climate target. Energy Policy, 45, 152–166. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.008
20. E.Helpman,, & P.R.Krugman, (1985). Market structure and foreign trade. Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. E.G.Hertwich,, & G.P.Peters, (2009). Carbon footprint of nations: A global, trade-linked analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 43, 6414–6420. doi:10.1021/es803496a
22. D.Hummels,, J.Ishii,, & K.-M.Yi, (2001). The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. Journal of International Economics, 54, 75–96. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00093-3
23. IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change – IPCC Working Group III Contribution toAR5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. M.Isaac,, & D.P.van Vuuren, (2009). Modeling global residential sector energy demand for heating and air conditioning in the context of climate change. Energy Policy, 37, 507–521. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.051
25. G.Jakeman,, & B.S.Fisher, (2006). Benefits of multi-gas mitigation: An application of the global trade and environment model (GTEM). The Energy Journal, Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy, Special Issue.
26. T.Junius,, & J.Oosterhaven, (2003). The solution of updating or regionalizing a matrix with both positive and negative entries. Economic Systems Research, 15, 87–96. doi:10.1080/0953531032000056954
27. B.Knopf,, O.Edenhofer,, T.Barker,, N.Bauer,, L.Baumstark,, B.Chateau,, D.… van Vuuren, (2009). The economics of low stabilisation: Implications for technological change and policy. In M. Hulme and H. Neufeldt (Eds.) Making climate change work for us (Chapter 11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. G.J.Kramer,, & M.Haigh, (2009). No quick switch to low-carbon energy. Nature, 462, 568–569. doi:10.1038/462568a
29. P.Krugman,, R.N.Cooper,, & T.N.Srinivasan, (1995). Growing world trade: Causes and consequences. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995, 327–377. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2534577
30. M.L.Lahr,, & L.De Mesnard, (2004). Biproportional techniques in input–output analysis: Updating and structural analysis. Economic Systems Research, 16, 115–134. doi:10.1080/0953531042000219259
31. M.Lenzen, (2011). Aggregation versus disaggregation in input–output analysis of the environment. Economic Systems Research, 23, 73–89. doi:10.1080/09535314.2010.548793
32. M.Lenzen,, D.Morgan,, K.Kanemoto,, & A.Geschke, (2013). Building Eora: A global multi-region input–output database at high country and sector resolution. Economic Systems Research, 25, 20–49. doi:10.1080/09535314.2013.769938
33. M.Meinshausen,, S.J.Smith,, K.Calvin,, J.S.Daniel,, M.L.T.Kainuma,, J.-F.Lamarque,, D.P.… van Vuuren, (2011). The RCP GHG concentrations and their extension from 1765 to 2300. Climatic Change, 109, 213–241. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z
34. R.E.Miller,, & P.D.Blair, (2009). Input–output analysis. Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. R.H.Moss,, J.A.Edmonds,, K.A.Hibbard,, M.R.Manning,, S.K.Rose,, D.P.van Vuuren,, T.J.… Wilbanks, (2010). The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature, 463, 747–756. doi:10.1038/nature08823
36. NETL. (2010). Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants volume 1: Bituminous coal and natural gas to electricity report of the national energy technology laboratory. Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory.
37. OECD. (2012a). OECD environmental outlook to 2050: The consequences of inaction. Paris: OECD Publishing.
38. OECD. (2012b). Looking to 2060: A global vision of long-term growth (OECD Economics Department Policy Notes, No. 15 November 2012). Paris: OECD Publishing.
39. RCP database. (2009). RCP database (Version 2.0.5) downloaded 2013-09-23. Retrieved from http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web-apps/tnt/RcpDb
40. K.Riahi,, S.Rao,, K.Volker,, C.Cho,, V.Chirkov,, G.Fischer,, P.… Rafaj, (2011). RCP8.5 – A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Climate Change, 109, 33–57. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y
41. S.K.Rose,, E.Kriegler,, R.Bibas,, K.Calvin,, D.Popp,, D.van Vuuren,, & J.Weyant, (2014). Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management. Climate Change, 123, 477–493. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0965-3
42. M.Schneider,, M.Romer,, M.Tschudin,, & H.Bolio, (2011). Sustainable cement production – present and future. Cement and Concrete Research, 41, 642–650. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.019
43. T.Searchinger,, R.Heimlich,, R.A.Houghton,, F.Dong,, A.Elobeid,, J.Fabiosa,, T.-H.… Yu, (2008). Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use changes. Science, 319, 1238–1240. doi:10.1126/science.1151861
44. M.Smyth,, & B.Pearce, (2008, April). Air travel demand (IATA Economics Briefing No 9). IATA.
45. R.Stone, (1961). Input–output and national accounts. Paris: Office of European Economic Cooperation.
46. 2 emissions embodied in trade: The effects of spatial aggregation. Ecological Economics, 70, 10–18. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.08.016
47. 2 emissions embodied in trade: The effects of sector aggregation. Energy Economics, 32, 166–175. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2009.07.010
48. A.M.Thomson,, K.V.Calvin,, S.J.Smith,, G.P.Kyle,, A.Volke,, P.Patel,, J.A.… Edmonds, (2011). RCP4.5: A pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100. Climate Change, 109, 77–94. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4
49. M.P.Timmer, (Ed.). (2012). The world input–output database (WIOD): Contents, sources and methods (WIOD Working Paper No. 10). Groningen: University of Groningen.
50. A.Tukker,, T.Bulavskaya,, S.Giljum,, A.de Koning,, S.Lutter,, M.Simas,, R.… Wood, (2014). The global resource footprint of nations; carbon, water, land and materials embodied in trade and final consumption calculated with EXIOBASE 2.1. Leiden/Delft/Vienna: Trondheim.
51. A.Tukker,, & E.Dietzenbacher, (2013). Global multiregional input–output frameworks: An introduction and outlook. Economic Systems Research, 25, 1–19. doi:10.1080/09535314.2012.761179
52. A.Tukker,, R.A.Goldbohm,, A.de Koning,, M.Verheijden,, R.Kleijn,, O.Wolf,, J.M.… Rueda-Cantuche, (2011). Environmental impacts of changes to healthier diets in Europe. Ecological Economics, 70, 1776–1788. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.001
53. A.Tukker,, A.de Koning,, R.Wood,, T.Hawkins,, S.Lutter,, J.Acosta,, J.… Kuenen, (2013). Exiopol – development and illustrative analyses of a detailed global MR EE SUT/IOT. Economic Systems Research, 25, 50–70. doi:10.1080/09535314.2012.761952
54. UNFCCC. (2011). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held inCancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. Addendum; Part two: Action taken by the Conference of Parties at its sixteenth session (FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1). Geneva: United Nations Office at Geneva.
55. J.van Vliet,, M.G.J.den Elzen,, & D.P.van Vuuren, (2009). Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation. Energy Economics, 31, S152–S162. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.010
56. D.P.V.Vuuren, D. P. van, E.Stehfest,, M.G.J.den Elzen,, T.Kram,, J.van Vliet,, S.Deetman,, B.… van Ruijven, (2011). RCP2.6: Exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2°C. Climatic Change, 109, 95–116. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0152-3
57. E.Worrell,, N.Martin,, & L.Price, (2000). Potentials for energy efficiency improvement in the US cement industry. Energy, 25, 1189–1214. doi:10.1016/S0360-5442(00)00042-6