Robson ten group classification system applied to women with severe maternal morbidity

Birth

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 38-47

  Ferreira, Elton Carlos ^a   Costa, Maria Laura ^a   Cecatti, José Guilherme ^a   Haddad, Samira M ^a   Parpinelli, Mary Angela ^a   Robson, Michael S ^b   Souza, Joao P ^c   Pacagnella, Rodolfo C ^c   Surita, Fernanda G ^c   Pintoe Silva, Joao L ^c   Sousa, Maria H ^c   Rudge, Marilza V ^c   Calderon, Iracema M ^c   Bahamondes, Maria V ^c   Santana, Danielly S ^c   Gonçalves, Simone P ^c   Olimpio B Moraes Filho ^c   Carvalho, Simone A ^c   Feitosa, Francisco E ^c   Chaves, George N ^c   Brum, Ione R ^c   Saint'ynes, Gloria C ^c   Menezes, Carlos A ^c   Santos, Patricia N ^c   Guanabara, Everardo M ^c   Almeida, Elson J ^c   Moreira, Joaquim L ^c   Sousa, Maria R ^c   Peret, Frederico A ^c   Paula, Liv B ^c   Schmaltz, Luiza E ^c   Pessoni, Cleire ^c   Katz, Leila ^c   Bione, Adriana ^c   Barbosa Lima, Antonio C ^c   Rocha Filho, Edilberto A ^c   Amorim, Melania M ^c   Leite, Debora ^c   Radaci, Ivelyne ^c   Martins, Marilia G ^c   Barroso, Frederico ^c   Oliveira, Fernando C ^c   Nascimento, Denis J ^c   Paiva, Cláudio S ^c   Lima, Moises D ^c   Freire, Djacyr M ^c   Rohloff, Roger D ^c   Rodrigues, Simone M ^c   Costa, Sergio M ^c   Pfitscher, Lucia C ^c   Luz, Adriana G ^c   Guimaraes, Daniela ^c   Lobato, Gustavo ^c   Nakamura Pereira, Marcos ^c   Cordioli, Eduardo ^c   Peterossi, Alessandra ^c   Perez, Cynthia D ^c   Peraçoli, Jose C ^c   Costa, Roberto A ^c   Maia Filho, Nelson L ^c   Matias, Jacinta P ^c   Quintana, Silvana M ^c   Moises, Elaine C ^c   Fatima A Lotufo ^c   Carvalho, Luiz E ^c   Zanette, Elvira A ^c   Andreucci, Carla B ^c   Marcia M Aquino ^c   Ohnuma, Maria H ^c   Mattar, Rosiane ^c   Campanharo, Felipe F ^c   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b NATIONAL MATERNITY HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Cesarean delivery; Classification of cesarean delivery; Maternal near miss; Severe maternal morbidity

Indexed keywords

BRAZIL; CESAREAN SECTION; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DELIVERY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

BRAZIL; CESAREAN SECTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84922972322     PISSN: 07307659     EISSN: 1523536X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/birt.12155     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barros FC, Matijasevich A, Requejo JH, et al. Recent trends in maternal, newborn, and child health in Brazil: Progress toward Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5. Am J Public Health 2010;100(10):1877-1889.
2. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2013. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 64p., 2013. Accessed December 17, 2014. Available at http://www.unfpa.org/publications/millennium-development-goals-report-2013.
3. Pacagnella RC, Cecatti JG, Camargo RP, et al. Rationale for a long-term evaluation of the consequences of potentially life-threatening maternal conditions and maternal "near-miss" incidents using a multidimensional approach. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010;32(8):730-738.
4. Geller SE, Rosenberg D, Cox SM, et al. The continuum of maternal morbidity and mortality: Factors associated with severity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191(3):939-944.
5. Say L, Souza JP, Pattinson RC. WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications. Maternal near miss-towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23(3):287-296.
6. Torloni MR, Betran AP, Souza JP, et al. Classifications for cesarean section: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2011;6(1):e14566.
7. World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2(8452):436-437.
8. Ye J, Betrán AP, Vela MG, et al. Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery. Birth 2014;41(3):237-244.
9. Gibbons L, Belizan JM, Lauer J, et al. The Global Numbers and Costs of Additionally Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Performed Per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. World Health Report. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010. Accessed November 30, 2014. Available at: http://www.who.int/healthsystems/topics/financing/healthreport/30C-sectioncosts.pdf.
10. Robson MS. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Mat Med Rev 2001;12:23-39.
11. Haddad SM, Cecatti JG, Parpinelli MA, et al. From planning to practice: Building the national network for the Surveillance of Severe Maternal Morbidity. BMC Public Health 2011;11:283.
12. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. Evaluating the quality of care for severe pregnancy complications: The WHO near-miss approach for maternal health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 29p., 2011. Accessed January 15, 2015. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241502221_eng.pdf?ua=1.
13. Robson MS. Can we reduce the caesarean section rate? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001;15(1):179-194.
14. Farine D, Shepherd D. Classification of caesarean sections in Canada: The modified Robson criteria. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012;34(10):976-979.
15. Betrán AP, Gulmezoglu AM, Robson M, et al. WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America: Classifying caesarean sections. Reprod Health 2009;6:18.
16. Brennan DJ, Robson MS, Murphy M, O'Herlihy C. Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201(3):308. e1-8.
17. Costa ML, Cecatti JG, Souza JP, et al. Using a Caesarean Section Classification System based on characteristics of the population as a way of monitoring obstetric practice. Reprod Health 2010;7:13.
18. Howell S, Johnston T, Macleod SL. Trends and determinants of caesarean sections births in Queensland, 1997-2006. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;49(6):606-611.
19. Chong C, Su LL, Biswas A. Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012;91(12):1422-1427.
20. Ciriello E, Locatelli A, Incerti M, et al. Comparative analysis of cesarean delivery rates over a 10-year period in a single Institution using 10-class classification. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25(12):2717-2720.
21. Kelly S, Sprague A, Fell DB, et al. Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2013;35(3):206-214.
22. Souza JP, Cecatti JG, Faundes A, et al. Maternal near miss and maternal death in the World Health Organization's 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health. Bull World Health Organ 2010;88(2):113-119.
23. Lee YY, Roberts CL, Patterson JA, et al. Unexplained variation in hospital caesarean section rates. Med J Aust 2013;199(5):348-353.
24. Delbaere I, Cammu H, Martens E, et al. Limiting the caesarean section rate in low risk pregnancies is key to lowering the trend of increased abdominal deliveries: An observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012;12:3.
25. Roberts CL, Algert CS, Ford JB, et al. Pathways to a rising caesarean section rate: A population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 2012;2(5):e001725.
26. National Institute of Health. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Vaginal birth after cesarean: New insights March 8-10, 2010. Semin Perinatol 2010;34(5):351-365.
27. Homer CS, Kurinczuk JJ, Spark P, et al. A novel use of a classification system to audit severe maternal morbidity. Midwifery 2010;26(5):532-536.
28. Bateman BT, Berman MF, Riley LE, Leffert LR. The epidemiology of postpartum hemorrhage in a large, nationwide sample of deliveries. Anesth Analg 2010;110(5):1368-1373.
29. Almerie Y, Almerie MQ, Matar HE, Shahrour Y, Al Chamat AA, Abdulsalam A. Obstetric near-miss and maternal mortality in maternity university hospital, Damascus, Syria: A retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010;10:65.
30. Luz AG, Tiago DB, Silva JC, Amaral E. Severe maternal morbidity at a local reference university hospital in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2008;30(6):281-286.
31. Karolinski A, Mercer R, Micone P, et al. The epidemiology of life-threatening complications associated with reproductive process in public hospitals in Argentina. BJOG 2013;120(13):1685-1694.