Examining Caesarean Section Rates in Canada Using the Robson Classification System

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 206-214

  Kelly, Sherrie ^a,b   Sprague, Ann ^a,b   Fell, Deshayne B ^a,b   Murphy, Phil ^c   Aelicks, Nancy ^d   Guo, Yanfang ^e   Fahey, John ^f   Lauzon, Leeanne ^f   Scott, Heather ^g   Lee, Lily ^h   Kinniburgh, Brooke ^h   Prince, Monica ^a,b   Walker, Mark ^a,b,e,h  

^a Better Outcomes Registry and Network (BORN) Ontario   (Canada)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c Eastern Health   (Canada)

^d Alberta Perinatal Health Program   (Canada)

^e OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^f Reproductive Care Program of Nova Scotia   (Canada)

^g Perinatal Services British Columbia   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Caesarean section; Quality improvement; Robson classification

Indexed keywords

ALBERTA; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; BRITISH COLUMBIA; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFECT SIZE; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; LABOR ONSET; MONITORING; NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR; NOVA SCOTIA; NULLIPARA; ONTARIO; PREVALENCE; ROBSON CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; CANADA; GESTATIONAL AGE; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; STATISTICS;

CANADA; CESAREAN SECTION; CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; LABOR PRESENTATION; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT;

EID: 84883760741     PISSN: 17012163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30992-0     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985, 2:436-437.
2. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Health indicators 2012: Caesarean section 2012, Available at:, Accessed July 26. http://www.cihi.ca/hirpt/search.jspa.
3. Public Health Agency of Canada Canadian perinatal health report 2008, PHAC, Ottawa. 2008 ed.
4. Villar J., Valladares E., Wojdyla D., Zavaleta N., Carroli G., Velazco A., et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 2006, 367:1819-1829.
5. Villar J., Carroli G., Zavaleta N., Donner A., Wojdyla D., Faundes A., et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. BMJ 2007, 335:1025.
6. Henderson J., McCandlish R., Kumiega L., Petrou S. Systematic review of economic aspects of alternative modes of delivery. BJOG 2001, 108:149-157.
7. Lin H.C., Xirasagar S. Institutional factors in cesarean delivery rates: policy and research implications. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 103:128-136.
8. Liu S., Liston R.M., Joseph K.S., Heaman M., Sauve R., Kramer M.S. Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ 2007, 176:455-460.
9. Joseph K.S., Young D.C., Dodds L., O'Connell C.M., Allen V.M., Chandra S. Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2003, 102:791-800.
10. Childbirth Connection. Cesarean section best evidence: C-section (last updated 2009) 2012, Available at:, Accessed July 26. http://www.childbirthconnection.org.
11. Hamilton B.E., Martin J.A., Ventura S.J. Births: preliminary data for 2009. National Vital Statistics Reports 2010, 59:1-14.
12. Dickens B.M., Cook R.J. The legal effects of fetal monitoring guidelines. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010, 108:170-173.
13. Robson M.S. Can we reduce the cesarean section rate?. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001, 15:179-194.
14. Joseph K.S., Fahey J. Validation of perinatal data in the Discharge Abstract Database of the Canadian Institute for Health Information. Chronic Dis Can 2009, 29:96-100.
15. Dunn S., Bottomley J., Ali A., Walker M. 2008 Niday Perinatal Database quality audit: report of a quality assurance project. Chronic Dis Inj Can 2011, 3232-3242.
16. Perinatal Services BC Validation of the indications for cesarean delivery in the British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry 2012, Perinatal Services BC, Vancouver.
17. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans 2012, Available at:, Updated: 2010. Accessed July 26. http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf.
18. Betran A.P., Gulmezoglu A.M., Robson M., Merialdi M., Souza J.P., Wojdyla D., et al. WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections. Reprod Health 2009, 6:18.
19. Brennan D.J., Robson M.S., Murphy M., O'Herlihy C. Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identified significant variation in spontaneous labour. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009, 201:308. e1-e8.
20. Robson M.S. Classification of cesarean section. Fet Matern Med Rev 2001, 12:23-39.
21. Robson M.S., Scudamore I.W., Walsh S.M. Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996, 174:199-205.
22. Paul R.H., Miller D.A. Cesarean birth: how to reduce the rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995, 172:1903-1911.
23. Gregory K.D., Fridman M., Korst L. Trends and patterns of vaginal birth after cesarean availability in the United States. Semin Perinatol 2010, 34:237-243.
24. McMahon M.J., Luther E.R., Bowes W.A., Olshan A.F. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second caesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996, 335:689-695.
25. Cunningham F.G., Bangdiwala S., Brown S.S., Dean T.M., Frederiksen M., Hogue C.J., et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol 2010, 115:1279-1295.
26. National Center for Health Statistics. Health indicators 2012, Available at:, Accessed July 26, 2012. http://www.healthindicators.gov.
27. Grady D. New guidelines seek to reduce repeat Caesareans. The New York Times July 21, 2010, Available at:, Accessed July 26, 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/22/health/22birth.html.
28. Health in the News. New cesarean guidelines: will they really reduce the rate of repeat C-sections 2012, Available at:, Accessed July 26. http://www.everydayhealth.com.
29. Crowther C.A., Dodd J.M., Hiller J.E., Haslam R.R., Robinson J.S. Birth After Caesarean Study Group. Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial. PLoS Med 2012, 9(3):e1001192.
30. Tollanes M.C. Increased rate of Cesarean sections-causes and consequences. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2009, 129:1329-1331.
31. Liang W.H., Yuan C.C., Hung J.H., Yang M.L., Yang M.J., Chen Y.J., et al. Effect of peer review and trial of labor on lowering cesarean section rates. J Chin Med Assoc 2004, 67(6):281-286.
32. Lagrew D., Morgan M. Decreasing the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: success without mandated clinical changes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996, 174:184-191.
33. Althabe F., Belizan J.M., Villar J., Alexander S., Bergel E., Ramos S., et al. Latin American Caesarean Section Study Group. Mandatory second opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004, 363:1934-1940.
34. Flamm B., Berwick D., Kabcenell A. Reducing cesarean section rates safely: lessons from a "breakthrough series" collaborative. Birth 1998, 25:117-124.
35. Frigoletto F.D., Lieberman E., Lang J.M., Cohen A., Barss V., Ringer S., et al. A clinical trial of active management of labor. N Engl J Med 1995, 333:745-750.
36. Lopez-Zeno J., Peaceman A.M., Adashek J.A., Socol M.L. A controlled trial of a program for the active management of labor. New Engl J Med 1992, 126:150-154.
37. Homer C., Davis G.K., Brodie P.M., Sheehan A., Barclay L.M., Wills J., et al. Collaboration in maternity care: a randomised controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard hospital care. BJOG 2001, 108:16-22.
38. Socol M., Garcia P.M., Peaceman A.M., Dooley S.L. Reducing cesarean births at a primarily private university hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993, 168:1748-1758.
39. Hannah M.E., Hannah W.J., Hewson S.A., Hodnett E.D., Saigal S., Willan A.R. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2000, 356:1375-1383.
40. Goffinet F., Carayol M., Foidart J.M., Alexander S., Uzan S., Subtil D. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006, 194:1002-1011.
41. Kotaska A., Menticoglou S., Gagnon R., Farine D., Basso M., Bos H., et al. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee. Vaginal delivery of breech presentation. SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline, No. 226, July 2009. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009, 31:557-566.
42. Graham I., Logan Jo., Davies B., Nimrod C. Changing the use of electronic fetal monitoring and labor support: a case study of barriers and facilitators. Birth 2004, 31:293-301.
43. Chalmers B., Kaczorowski J., O'Brien B., Royle C. Rates of interventions in labor and birth across Canada: findings of the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. Birth 2012, 39:203-210.
44. Bickell N.A., Zdeb M.S., Applegate M.S., Roohan P.J., Sui A.L. Effect of external peer review on cesarean delivery rates: a statewide program. Obstet Gynecol 1996, 87:664-667.
45. Lagrew D., Morgan M. Decreasing the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: success without mandated clinical changes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996, 174:184-191.
46. Poma P. Effect of departmental policies on cesarean delivery rates: a community hospital experience. Obstet Gynecol 1998, 91:1013-1018.
47. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Sustainability and its relationship with spread and adoption: general improvement skills 2007, Available at:, Accessed July 26, 2012. http://www.institute.nhs.uk/index.php.