Requirements of older adults for a daily use of an internet-based cognitive training platform

Informatics for Health and Social Care

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 139-153

  Haesner, Marten ^a   O'Sullivan, Julie L ^a   Gövercin, Mehmet ^a   Steinhagen Thiessen, Elisabeth ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive training software; Older adults; Requirement analysis; Web 2.0 platform; Web usability

Indexed keywords

AGED; AGING; COGNITION; COGNITION DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERVIEW; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORK; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; COGNITION; COGNITION DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORKING;

EID: 84922940974     PISSN: 17538157     EISSN: 17538165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17538157.2013.879149     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Kramer AF, Willis SL. Enhancing the cognitive vitality of olDer adults. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 2002;11:173-7
2. Vance DE, Webb NM, Marceaux JC, et al. Mental stimulation, neural plasticity, and aging: directions for nursing research and practice. J Neurosci Nursing 2008;40: 241-9
3. Buitenweg JIV, Murre JMJ, Richard RidDerinkhof K. Brain training in progress: a review of trainability in healthy seniors. Front Hum Neurosci 2012;6:183. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00183
4. Hertzog C, Kramer AF, Wilson RS, Lindenberger U. Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: can the functional capacity of olDer adults be preserved and enhanced? Psychol Sci Public Interest, Supplement 2008;9:1-65
5. Lustig C, Shah P, Seidler R, Reuter-Lorenz PA. Aging, training, and the brain: a review and future directions. Neuropsychol Rev 2009;19:504-22
6. Papp KV, Walsh SJ, SnyDer PJ. Immediate and delayed effects of cognitive interventions in healthy elDerly: a review of current literature and future directions. Alzheimers Dement 2009;5:50-60
7. Schmiedek F, Bauer C, Lovden M, et al. ForDerung kognitiver Aktivitat im Alter:internet-basierte Trainingsprogramme. In: Lindenberger U, Nehmer J, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Delius J, eds. Altern und Technik: Altern in Deutschland. 1st ed. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 2011:35-52
8. Ghisletta P, Bickel J-F, Lovden M. Does activity engagement protect against cognitive decline in old age? Methodological and analytical consiDerations. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2006;61:253-61
9. Wilson RS, Scherr PA, SchneiDer JA, et al. Relation of cognitive activity to risk of developing Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2007;69:1911-20
10. Scarmeas N, Levy G, Tang M-X, et al. Influence of leisure activity on the incidence of Alzheimers disease. Neurology 2001;57:2236-42
11. Bassuk SS, Glass TA, Berkman LF. Social disengagement and incident cognitive decline in community-dwelling elDerly persons. Ann Internal Med 1999;131: 165-73
12. Fratiglioni L, Wang H-X, Ericsson K, et al. Influence of social network on occurrence of dementia: a community-based longitudinal study. Lancet 2000;355: 1315-19
13. Lovden M, Ghisletta P, Lindenberger U. Social participation attenuates decline in perceptual speed in old and very old age. Psychol Aging 2005;20:423-34
14. James BD, Wilson RS, Barnes LL, Bennett DA. Late-life social activity and cognitive decline in old age. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2011;17:998-1005
15. Krueger KR, Wilson RS, Kamenetsky JM, et al. Social engagement and cognitive function in old age. Exp Aging Res 2009;35:45-60
16. Wilson RS, Krueger KR, Arnold SE, et al. Loneliness and risk of Alzheimer disease. Archives Gen Psychiatr 2007;64:234-40
17. Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, Jonides J, Perrig WJ. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2008;105:6829-33
18. Mahncke HW, Connor BB, Appelman J, et al. Memory enhancement in healthy olDer adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: a randomized, controlled study. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2006;103:12523-8
19. Wadley VG, Benz RL, Ball KK, et al. Development and evaluation of home-based speed-of-processing training for olDer adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87: 757-63
20. Ball K, Edwards JD, Ross LA. The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday functions. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2007;62:19-31
21. KueiDer AM, Parisi JM, Gross AL, Rebok GW. Computerized cognitive training with olDer adults: a systematic review. PLoS One 2012;7:e40588
22. Teixiera CVL, Gobbi LTB, Corazza DI, et al. Non-pharmalogical interventions on cognitive functions in olDer people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Arch Gerontol Geriat 2012;54:175-80
23. Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, et al. Mild cognitive impairment-beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Int Med 2004;256:240-6
24. Petersen RC, Parisi JE, Dickson DW, et al. Neuropathologic features of amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 2006;63:665-72
25. Belleville S, Gilbert B, Fontaine F, et al. Improvement of episodic memory in persons with mild cognitive impairment and health olDer adults: evidence from a cognitive intervention program. Dement Geriat Cognit DisorDers 2006;22: 486-99
26. Talassi E, Guerreschi M, Feriani M, et al. Effectiveness of a cognitive rehabilitation program in mild dementia (MD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI): a case control study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2007;44:391-9
27. OReilly T. What Is Web 2.0 Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software; 2005. Available from: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html via the INTERNET [last accessed 24 Sep 2013]
28. Pfeil U, Arjan R, Zaphiris P. Age differences in online social networking-A study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and olDer users in MySpace. Comput Hum Behav 2009;25:643-54
29. Xie B. OlDer Chinese, the internet, and well-being. Care Manage J: J Case Manage 2007;8:33-8
30. Namazi KH, McClintic M. Computer use among elDerly persons in long-term care facilities. Educ Gerontol 2003;29:535-50
31. Jaeger PT, Xie B. Developing online community accessibility guidelines for persons with disabilities and olDer adults. J Disabil Policy Stud 2009;20:55-63
32. Xie B, Watkins I, Golbeck J, Huang M. UnDerstanding and changing olDer adults perceptions and learning of social media. Educ Gerontol 2012;38:282-96
33. Leist AK. Social media use of olDer adults: a mini-review. Gerontology 2013;59:378-84
34. Guo B, Bricout JC, Huang J. A common open space or a digital divide? A social model perspective on the online disability community in China. Disabil Soc 2005; 20:49-66
35. Cotten SR, AnDerson W, McCullough B. The impact of ICT use on loneliness and contact with others among olDer adults. Gerontechnology 2012;11:39 (1-13)
36. Madden M. Pew Research Centers Internet and American Life Project 2010. Available from: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/OlDer-Adults-And-Social-Media.aspx via the INTERNET [last accessed 24 Sep 2013]
37. BITKOM. Soziale Netzwerke. Eine reprasentative Untersuchung zur Nutzung sozialer Netzwerke im Internet 2011. Available from: http://www.bitkom.org/files/documents/SozialeNetzwerke.pdf via the INTERNET [last accessed 24 Sep 2013]
38. Lehtinen V, Nasanen J, Sarvas R. A little silly and empty-headed-olDer adults unDerstandings of social networking sites. BCS-HCI 2009 Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology 2009;45-54
39. Stadelhofer C, Marquard M. SeniorInnen und Online-Medien. Zeitschrift fu r Medienpadagogik 2004;48:9-17
40. Kerres M. Potenziale von Web 2.0 nutzen. In: Hohenstein A, Wilbers K, eds. Handbuch E-Learning. Mu nchen: Fachverlag Deutscher Wirtschaftsdienst; 2006 Available from: http://mediendidaktik.uni-due.de/sites/default/files/web20-A-0.pdf
41. Jacobs Center on Lifelong Learning and Institutional Development. Evaluation Der kognitiven trainings im Rahmen des landesprogramms. Brandenburg: Akademie 50plus; 2011:1-74
42. Sayago S, Blat J. About the relevance of accessibility barriers in the everyday interactions of olDer people with the web. Proceedings of the 2009 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibililty (W4A). W4A09; 2009; New York, NY: ACM; 104-13
43. Brajnik G, Yesilada Y, Harper S. Web accessibility guideline aggregation for olDer users and its validation. Univ Access Inform Soc 2011;10:403-23
44. Result. Ergebnisbericht zur Studie Web 2.0 und die Generation 50+; 2007. Available from: http://www.result.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/ergebnisberichtzur-studie-web-2-0-und-die-generat.pdf via the INTERNET [last accessed 24 Sep 2013]
45. Morrell RW, Mayhorn CB, Echt KV. Why olDer adults use and do not use the internet. In: Burdick DC, Kwon S, eds. Gerotechnology: research and practice in technology and aging. 1st ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2004: 71-85
46. Bennett J, Loetscher S. How online communities can make a contribution to the social integration of persons aged 60 to 75. An exploratory study. Bern: Zeix AG; 2012
47. Ofcom Consumer Panel. OlDer people &communications technology qualitative research. London, UK: Ofcom Consumer Panel; 2006
48. Kirchmair R. Bedu rfnisse und AnforDerungen Der Best Agers an IT-Produkte. In: Kimpeler S, ISI KF-I fu r SI, Baier E, eds. IT-basierte Produkte und Dienste fu r altere Menschen-NutzeranforDerungen und Techniktrends: Tagungsband zur FAZIT Fachtagung Best Agers in Der Informationsgesellschaft. Stuttgart, Germany: IRB Verlag; 2006:31-41
49. Xie B, Huang M, Watkins I. Technology and retirement life: a systematic review of the literature on olDer adults and social media. In: Wang M, ed. The Oxford handbook of retirement. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2012
50. IFS. Usability and Ergonomics ConsiDerations on eLearning of OlDer Adults. 2007 [cited 2013 March 22]. Available from: http://www.seniorlearning.eu/site/Output%202%20-%20usability%20and%20ergonomics%20report.pdf [last accessed 28 Jun 2013]
51. Majcen K. Soziale Interaktion fu r die Zielgruppe 60+-Das Projekt ALICE. Scribd 2011. Available from: http://de.scribd.com/doc/70998330/Soziale-Interaktion-furdie-Zielgruppe-60-Das-Projekt-ALICE [last accessed 28 Jun 2013]
52. Yong GJ. OlDer adults in an aging society and social computing: a research agenda. Intl J Hum-Comp Interact 2010;26:1122-46
53. Neyer FJ, Felber J, Gebhardt C. Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala zur Erfassung von Technikbereitschaft. Diagnostica 2012;58:87-99
54. Mayring P. Qualitative inhaltsanalyse: grundlagen und techniken. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz; 2010
55. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:349-57
56. Wilms I, Mogensen J. Dissimilar outcomes of apparently similar procedures as a challenge to clinical neurorehabilitation and basic research: When the same is not the same. Neuro Rehabil 2011;29:221-7
57. Botella C, Etchemendy E, Castilla D, et al. An e-health system for the elDerly (Butler Project): a pilot study on acceptance and satisfaction. Cyberpsychol Behav: Impact Internet, Multimedia Virtual Reality Behav Soc 2009;12:255-62
58. Koenig ST, Dunser A, Bartneck C, et al. Development of virtual environments for patient-centered rehabilitation held at the International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation; 2011 Jun 27-30; Zurich