The future, in France, of enhanced recovery after surgery seen from the economical perspective;L'avenir en France de la réhabilitation améliorée après chirurgie, vu sous l'angle médico-économique

Presse Medicale

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2015, Pages e23-e31

  Faujour, Véronique ^a   Slim, Karem ^b   Corond, Pascal ^a  

^a HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF CLERMONT FERRAND   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLADDER SURGERY; COLORECTAL SURGERY; ENHANCED RECOVERY PROGRAM; FRANCE; GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH PROGRAM; HIP SURGERY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; KNEE SURGERY; LIVER SURGERY; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; SHOULDER SURGERY; SIMULATION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UROLOGIC SURGERY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LENGTH OF STAY; PILOT STUDY; PROCEDURES; REHABILITATION; TRENDS;

CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA COLLECTION; FRANCE; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; PILOT PROJECTS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; SPECIALTIES, SURGICAL; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; THERAPIES, INVESTIGATIONAL;

EID: 84922858126     PISSN: 07554982     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2014.07.021     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alfonsi P., Slim K., Chauvin M., Mariani P., Faucheron J.L., Fletcher D., et al. French guidelines for enhanced recovery after elective colorectal surgery. J Visc Surg 2014, 151:65-79.
2. Kehlet H., Wilmore D.W. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 2008, 248:189-198.
3. NHS Institute Enhanced recovery partnership programme. Delivering enhanced recovery - helping patients to get better sooner after surgery [Accès au site le 20/11/2014]. http://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_service:improvement_tools/quality_and_service:improvement_tools/enhanced_recovery_programme.html.
4. Samour T., Zargar-Shoshtarik, Bhat A., Kahokeh A., Hill A.G. A programme of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J 2010, 123:61-70.
5. Roulin D., Donadini A., Gander S., Griesser A.-C., Blanc C., Hübner M., et al. Cost effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2013, 100:1108-1114.
6. Lee L., Li C., Landry T., Latimer E., Carli F., Fried G.M., et al. A systematic review of economic evaluations of enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2014, 259:670-676.
7. Spanjersberg W.R., Reurings J., Keus F., van Laarhoven C.J. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, 2:CD007635.
8. Rodgers E.M. Diffusion of innovation 2003, NYY Free Press, New York. 5th ed.
9. Steyer A., Zimmermann J.B. Influence sociale et diffusion de l'innovation. Math Soc Sci 2004, 168:43-57.
10. Duhamel F., Santi M. Degree of innovativeness and new product performance. Tech Anal Strat Manag 2012, 24:253-266.
11. Laurence Lehmann-Ortega, Jean Marc, Schoettl Rupture et perturbation: les deux formes de l'innovation stratégique. Association internationale du management stratégique 2005, [Accès au site le 20/11/2014]. http://www.strategie-aims.com/searches/index2.
12. Kotler P., Keller K.L., Manceau D., Dubois B. Marketing management 2009, Pearson education, Paris. 13e ed.
13. Coolsen M.M., van Dam R.M., van der Wilt A.A., Slim K., Lassen K., Dejong C.H. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies. World J Surg 2013, 37:1909-1918.
14. Lassen K., Collsen M.M.E., Slim K., Carli F., de Aguilar-Nascimento J.E., Schäffer M., et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for pancraticoduodennectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. World J Surg 2013, 37:240-258.
15. Coolsen M.E., Wong-Lung-Hing E.M., van Dam R.M., Van der Wilt A.A., Slim K., Lassen K., et al. A systematic review of outcomes in patients undergoing liver surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. HPB 2013, 15:245-251.
16. Kehlet H. Fast track hip and knee arthroplasty. Lancet 2013, 381:1600-1602.
17. Larsen K., Hansen T.B., Søballe K., Kehlet H. Patient-reported outcome after fast-track hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010, 8:144.
18. Holm B., Thorborg K., Husted H., Kehlet H., Bandholm T. Surgery-induced changes and early recovery of hip-muscle strength, leg-press power, and functional performance after fast-track total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2013, 8:e62109.
19. Aning J., Neal D., Driver A., McGrath J. Enhanced recovery: from principles to practice in urology. BJU Int 2010, 105:1199-1201.
20. Cerantola Y., Valerio M., Persson B., Jichlinski P., Ljungqvist O., Hubner M., et al. Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Clin Nutr 2013, 32:879-887.
21. Patel H.R., Cerantola Y., Valerio M., Persson B., Jichlinski P., Ljungqvist O., et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: are we ready, and can we afford not to implement these pathways for patients undergoing radical cystectomy?. Eur Urol 2014, 65:263-266.
22. Shi J.K., Siege J.G. Modern cost management & analysis. Barron's Educational Series 2000, 346.
23. Kongstvedt P.R. Essentials of managed health care 2012, Jones & Bartlett Publishers, London. 6th ed.
24. ANAP L'observatoire des coÛts de la construction hospitalière (rapport 2011) 2011, [Accès au site le 20/11/2014]. http://www.anap.fr/detail-dune-publication-ou-dun-outil/recherche/lobservatoire-des-couts-de-la-construction-hospitaliere-rapport-2011/.
25. Udvarhelyi I.S., Colditz G.A., Rai A., Epstein A.M. Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses in the medical literature: are the methods being used correctly?. Ann Intern Med 1992, 116:238-244.
26. ATIH Étude nationale des coÛts 2014, [Accès au site le 20/11/2014]. http://www.atih.sante.fr/index.php?id=000030000000.
27. Doubilet P., Weinstein M.C., McNeil B.J. Use and misuse of the term "cost effective" in medicine. N Engl J Med 1986, 314:253-256.
28. Anderson M., Comprie R. Adopting preoperative fasting guideline. AORN J 2009, 90:73-80.
29. Ahmed J., Khan S., Gatt M., Kallam R., MacFie J. Compliance with enhanced recovery programmes in elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2010, 97:754-758.
30. Wilmore D.W., Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ 2001, 322:473-476.
31. Vonlanthen R., Slankamenac K., Breitenstein S., Puhan M.A., Muller M.K., Hahnloser D., et al. The impact of complication on costs of major surgical procedures: a cost analysis of 1200 patients. Ann Surg 2011, 254:907-913.
32. Hendry P.O., Hausel J., Nygren J., Lassen K., Dejong C., Ljungqvist O., et al. Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 2009, 96:197-205.
33. Kim W.C., Mauborgne R. Value innovation: the strategic logic of high growth. Harv Bus Rev 1997, 75:102-112.
34. Slim K. Fast-track surgery: the next revolution in surgical care following laparoscopy. Colorectal Dis 2011, 13:478-480.
35. Kehlet H., Slim K. The future of fast-track surgery. Br J Surg 2012, 99:1025-1026.