The Design, Deployment and Evaluation of the AnimalWatch Intelligent Tutoring System

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 178, Issue , 2008, Pages 663-667

  Cohen, Paul R ^a   Beal, Carole R ^a   Adams, Niall M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; TEACHING;

'CURRENT; CONTROLLED CONDITIONS; INTELLIGENT TUTORING; LOW-ACHIEVING STUDENTS; SECONDARY SCHOOLS; STUDENT POPULATIONS; TUTORING SYSTEM; URBAN SCHOOLS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84922780523     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-58603-891-5-663     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. National Education Association. Meeting the challenges of teacher recruitment and retention., 2003.
2. G. Barnes, E. Crowe, and B Schaefer. The costs of teacher turnover in five school districts., 2007.
3. C. R. Beal, L. Qu, and H. Lee, ‘Classifying learner engagement through integration of multiple data sources.’, in Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Boston MA., (2006).
4. C. R. Beal, E. Shaw, and M. Birch., ‘Intelligent tutoring and human tutoring in small groups: An empirical comparison.’, in Artificial intelligence in education: Building technology-rich learning contexts that work. Amsterdam: IOS Press., (2007).
5. B.S. Bloom, ‘The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring.’, Educational Researcher, 13, 4–16, (1984).
6. M. Boekaerts, ‘The on-line motivation questionnaire: A self-report instrument to assess students’ context sensitivity’, in Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Vol. 12: New Directions in Measures and Methods, eds., P. R. Pintrich and M. L. Maehr, pp. 77–120. Elsevier Science, (2002).
7. A. L. Brown, S. Ellery, and J. Campione, ‘Creating zones of proximal development electronically’, in Thinking practices: A symposium in mathematics and science education, eds., J. Greeno and S. Goldman. Erlbaum, (1994).
8. G. Christensen and P. Stanat, ‘Language policies and practices for helping immigrants and second-generation students succeed’, in Transatlantic Task Forces on Immigration and Integration., (2007).
9. M. Crul. Pathways to success for the children of immigrants., 2007.
10. J. Eccles, A. Wigfield, R. D. Harold, and P. Blumenfeld, ‘Age and gender differences in children’s self and task perceptions during elementary school.’, Child Development, 64, 830–847, (1993).
11. European Trade Union Committee for Education. Europe needs teachers, 2005.
12. National Center for Education Statistics. Comparative indicators of education in the united states and other g-8 countries: 2006., 2007.
13. The Math League. Math league website: http://www.mathleague.com/.
14. M. R. Lepper, M. Woolverton, D. Mumme, and J. Gurtner, ‘Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors.’, in Computers as cognitive tools, eds., S. P. La-joie and S. J. Derry, pp. 75–105. Erlbaum, (1993).
15. S. McIntosh and H.. Steedman. Low skills: A problem for europe., 2000.
16. D. C. Merrill, B. J. Reiser, M. Ranney, and J. G. Trafton, ‘Effective tutoring techniques: A comparison of human tutors and intelligent tutoring systems.’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 277–305, (1992).
17. California Department of Education. Dataquest query results retrieved from http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest, 2007.
18. U.S. Dept. of Education. No child left behind is working., 2006.
19. U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences. Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Report from the first student cohort, 2007.
20. U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences. What works website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/twp.asp, 2008.
21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Principles and standards for school mathematics., 2000.
22. J. M. Royer, L. N. Tronsky, Y. Chan, S. J. Jackson, and H. Merchant, ‘Math fact retrieval as the cognitive mechanism underlying gender differences in math test performance’, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 181–266, (1999).
23. S. G.. Vandenberg. Mental rotation test, 1971.
24. J. J. Walczyk and D. A. Griffith-Ross, ‘Time restriction and the linkage between subcomponent efficiency and algebraic inequality success’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 617–627, (2006).