Is there an obligation to participate in medical research?

The Limits of Consent: A Socio-Ethical Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  John, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical research; Individual autonomy; Informed consent; Patients' rights; Physicians' obligations; Public participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922760799     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231461.003.0007     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Anderson, E. (1999). What is the point of equality? Ethics 109, no. 2, 287-337.
2. Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J. (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (4th edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Brownsword, R. (2004). The cult of consent: fixation and fallacy. King's College Law Journal, 15, no. 2 , 223-53.
4. Buchanan, D. and Miller, F. (2006). A public health perspective on research ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32, 729-33.
5. Callahan, D. (1996). Can the moral commons survive autonomy? Hastings Center Report, 26, no. 6 , 41-2.
6. Cullity, G. (1995). Moral free riding. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24, no. 1 , 3-34.
7. Daniels, N. (1985). Just Healthcare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Evans, H. (2004). Should patients be allowed to veto their participation in clinical research? Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 198-203.
9. Faden, R. and Beauchamp, T. (1986). A History and Theory of Informed Consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Harris, J. (2005). Scientific research is a moral duty. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 242-8.
11. Hart, H. (1955). Are there any natural rights? Philosophical Review, 64, 175-91.
12. Holm, S. (2001). Not just autonomy: the principles of American biomedical ethics. In Bioethics, edited by J. Harris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Klosko, G. (1987). Presumptive benefit, fairness, and political obligation. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 16, no. 3 , 241-59.
14. Laurie, G. (2002). Genetic Privacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Macklin, R. (2004). Double Standards in Medical Research in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Manson, N. and O'Neill, O. (2007). Rethinking Informed Consent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Newdick, C. (2005). Who Should We Treat? Rights, Rationing and Resources in the NHS (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. O'Neill, O. (1985). Between consenting adults. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14, no. 3 , 252-77.
19. O'Neill, O. (1996). Towards Justice and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. O'Neill, O. (2002). Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Pogge, T. (2004). Relational conceptions of justice in Sen, A, Peter, F and Anand, A. Public health ethics and equity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Pogge, T. (2006). Human rights and global health: a research program'. In Global Institutions and Responsibilities, edited by T. Pogge and C. Barry. London: Blackwell.
23. Rainbolt, G. (2000). Perfect and imperfect obligations, Philosophical Studies, 98, no. 3 , 233-56.
24. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2005). You ought to be ashamed of yourself (when you violate an imperfect moral obligation). Philosophical Issues, 15, no. 1 , 193-208.
25. Weijer, C. (2002). I need a placebo like I need a hole in the head. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 30, 69-72.
26. Weijer, C. and Miller, P. (2004). When are research risks reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits? Nature Medicine, 10, 570-3.
27. Wolff, J. and de Shalit, A. (2007). Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.