Should patients be allowed to veto their participation in clinical research?

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 198-203

  Evans, H M ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT INFORMATION; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TAX;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

BODY IMAGE; CLINICAL TRIALS; COMMUNICATION; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MORALS; PATIENT RIGHTS; PATIENTS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; RESEARCH DESIGN; RISK FACTORS; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; STATE MEDICINE; VIOLENCE;

EID: 2342444713     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.002444     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Swift J. A modest proposal for preventing the children of the poor people in Ireland from being a burden to the parents or country, and for making them beneficial to the public. Swift J. A modest proposal and other satires. New York: Prometheus Books, 1994.
2. Harris J. The survival lottery. Philosophy 1975;50:81-7.
3. Jarvis R. Join the club: a modest proposal to increase availability of donor organs. J Med Ethics 1995;21:199-204.
4. West R. Daniel Defoe: the life and strange, surprising adventures. New York: Carroll & Graf, 1998.
5. Evans D, Evans M. A decent proposal: ethical review of clinical research. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1996, ch 6.
6. Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med 1987;317:141-5.
7. Sherrin N, ed. Oxford dictionary of humorous quotations. Oxford: OUP, 1995:197.
8. System riddled with failures, says Shipman judge. The Guardian. www.guardian.co.uk/Shipman/Story (accessed 19 Jul 2002).