The game of life: How small samples render choice simpler

The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science

Volumn 9780199216093, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Hertwig, Ralph ^a   Pleskac, Timothy J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Prospect theory; Simplicity; Small samples; Statistical information

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922760512     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216093.003.0010     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Allais, M. (1979). The foundations of a positive theory of choice involving risk and a criticism of the postulates and axioms of the American School. In M. Allais & O. Hagen (Eds.), Expected utility hypotheses and the Allais paradox. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel (originally published in 1953).
2. Anderson, J. R. (1991). Is human cognition adaptive? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 471-517.
3. Anderson, R. B., Doherty, M. E., Berg, N. D., & Friedrich, J. C. (2005). Sample size and the detection of correlation-a signal detection account: Comment on Kareev (2000) and Juslin and Olsson (2005). Psychological Review, 112, 268-279.
4. Barron, G., & Erev, I. (2003). Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description-based decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 215-233.
5. Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961-981.
6. Bell, D. E. (1985). Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 33, 1-27.
7. Berenson, A. (2006, December 4). End of drug trial is a big loss for Pfizer and heart patients [electronic version]. The New York Times. Retrieved 2007 May 31 from:
8. Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica, 22, 23-36 (Original work published 1738).
9. Bernoulli, J. (1969-1975). Ars conjectandi. In Die Werke von Jacob Bernoulli (Vol. 3, pp. 107-259). Basel, Switzerland: Basel Naturforschende Gesellschaft. (Original work published 1713.)
10. Bernstein, B. L. (1996). Against the gods: The remarkable story of risk. New York: Wiley & Sons.
11. Berry, D., & Fristedt, B. (1985). Bandit problems. London: Chapman and Hall.
12. Birnbaum, M., & Chavez, A. (1997). Tests of theories of decision making: Violations of branch independence and distribution independence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 161-194.
13. Brandstätter, E., Gigerenzer, G., & Hertwig, R. (2006). The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review, 113, 409-432.
14. Brunswik, E. (1943). Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review, 50, 255-272.
15. Busemeyer, J. R. (1985). Decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 538-564.
16. Busemeyer, J. R., & Stout, J. C. (2002). A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: Decomposing performance on the bechara gambling task. Psychological Assessment, 14, 253-262.
17. Buss, D. M. (Ed.). (2005). The handbook of evolutionary psychology. New York: Wiley.
18. Daston, L. (1988). Classical probability in the enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Daw, N. D., O'Doherty, J. P., Dayan, P., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans. Nature, 441, 876-879.
20. Denrell, J. (2007). Adaptive learning and risk taking. Psychological Review, 114, 177-187.
21. Dudai, Y., & Carruthers, M. (2005). The janus face of Mnemosyne. Nature, 434, 567.
22. Erev, I., & Barron, G. (2005). On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies. Psychological Review, 112, 912-931.
23. Fiedler, K., & Kareev, Y. (2006). Does decision quality (always) increase with the size of information samples? Some vicissitudes in applying the law of large numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 32, 883-903.
24. Fong, T. G., Krantz, D. H., & Nisbett, R. E. (1986). The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 253-292.
25. Fox, C. R., & Hadar, L. (2006). 'Decisions from experience' = sampling error + prospect theory: Reconsidering Hertwig, Barron, Weber & Erev (2004). Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 159-161.
26. George, A. L. (1959). Propaganda analysis: A study of inferences made from Nazi propaganda in World War II. Evanston, IL.: Row, Peterson and Co.
27. Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
28. Goldstein, W. M., & Weber, E. U. (1997). Content and discontent: Indications and implications of domain specificity in preferential decision making. In W M. Goldsmith & R. M. Hogarth (Eds.), Research on judgment and decision making: Currents, connections and controversies (pp. 566-617). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29. Gottlieb, D. A., Weiss, T., & Chapman, G. B. (2007). The format in which uncertainty information is presented affects decision biases. Psychological Science, 18, 240-246.
30. Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1992). The weighting of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 411-435.
31. Groopman, J. (2006, December 18). The right to a trial. The New Yorker, p. 41.
32. Hau, R., Pleskac, T., Kiefer, J., & Hertwig, R. (2007, in press). The description-experience gap in risky choice: The role of sample size and experienced probabilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
33. Heinrich, B. (1979). 'Majoring' and 'minoring' by foraging bumblebees, Bombus vagans: An experimental analysis. Ecology, 60, 245-255.
34. Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15, 534-539.
35. Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2006). The role of information sampling in risky choice. In K. Fiedler & P. Juslin (Eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 72-91). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Hertwig, R., & Pleskac, T. (2007). Decisions from experience: Small samples and the perception of differences. Manuscript submitted for publication.
37. Juslin, P., Fiedler, K., & Chater, N. (2006). Less is more in covariation detection-or is it? New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (2005). Capacity limitations and the detection of correlations: Comment on Kareev (2000). Psychological Review, 112, 256-267.
39. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
40. Kaplan, M., & Kaplan, E. (2006). Chances are...Adventures in probability. New York: Viking.
41. Kareev, Y. (1995). Through a narrow window-working-memory capacity and the detection of covariation. Cognition, 56, 263-269.
42. Kareev, Y. (2000). Seven (indeed, plus or minus two) and the detection of correlations. Psychological Review, 107, 397-402.
43. Kareev, Y. (2005). And yet the small-sample effect does hold: Reply to Juslin and Olsson (2005)
44. Anderson, Doherty, Berg, and Friedrich (2005). Psychological Review, 112, 280-285.
45. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. New York: Sentry Press.
46. Levitt, D. S., & Dubner, S. J. (2005). Freakonomics: A rogue economist explores the hidden side of everything. New York: Harper Collins.
47. Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal, 92, 805-824.
48. Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1986). Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies, 53, 271-282.
49. Lopes, L. L. (1983). Some thoughts on the psychological concept of risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 137-144.
50. Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions. New York: John Wiley & Son.
51. March, J. G. (1996). Learning to be risk averse. Psychological Review, 103, 309-319.
52. McNamara, J. M., & Houston, A. I. (1985). Optimal foraging and learning. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 117, 231-249.
53. McNamara, J. M., & Houston, A. I. (1987). Memory and the efficient use of information. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 125, 385-395.
54. Mellers, B. A. (2000). Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 910-924.
55. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number 7, plus or minus 2-some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
56. Real, L. A. (1992). Information processing and the evolutionary ecology of cognitive architecture. American Naturalist, 140, 108-145.
57. Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
58. Selten, R. (2001). What is bounded rationality? In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 13-36). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Shafir, S., & Roughgarden, J. (1998). Testing predictions of foraging theory for a sit-and-wait forager, anolis gingivinus. Behavioral Ecology, 9, 74-84
60. Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129-138.
61. Stoppard, T. (1967). Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are dead. New York: Grove Press Books.
62. Tversky, A., & Fox, C. R. (1995). Weighting risk and uncertainty. Psychological Review, 95, 269-283.
63. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
64. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (1980).
65. Weber, E. U., Shafir, S., & Blais, A. R. (2004). Predicting risk sensitivity in humans and lower animals: Risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psychological Review, 111, 430-445.
66. Winterfeldt, D. von., & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
67. Yechiam, E., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2005). Comparison of basic assumptions embedded in learning models for experience-based decision making. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 387-402.
68. Zacks, R. T., & Hasher, L. (2002). Frequency processing: A twenty-five year perspective. In P. Sedlmeier & T. Betsch (Eds.), Ect.: frequency processing and cognition (pp. 21-36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.