Creating value in health by understanding and overcoming resistance to de-innovation

Health Affairs

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 239-244

  Ubel, Peter A ^a   Asch, David A ^b,c  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; COGNITION; ENDOWMENT EFFECT; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; NOTE; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PROSTATE CANCER; RISK FACTOR; SELECTION BIAS; SLEEP DISORDER; UNITED STATES; UROLOGIST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; ECONOMICS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MALE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; REIMBURSEMENT; SLEEP WAKE DISORDERS; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRENDS; UTILIZATION;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REIMBURSEMENT MECHANISMS; SLEEP WAKE DISORDERS;

EID: 84922759419     PISSN: 02782715     EISSN: 15445208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0983     Document Type: Note

References (22)

1. Eisenberg JM, Schwartz JS, McCaslin FC, Kaufman R, Glick H, Kroch E. Substituting diagnostic services. New tests only partly replace older ones. JAMA. 1989; 262(9):1196-200.
2. Roman BR, Asch DA. Faded promises: the challenge of deadopting low-value care. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(2):149-50.
3. US Preventive Services Task Force. Prostate cancer: screening [Internet]. Rockville (MD): USPSTF; [current as of 2013 Sep; cited 2014 Dec 4]. Available from: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/prostatecancerscreening/prostatefinalrs.htm
4. Jaslow R. Urologists no longer recommend routine PSA testing for prostate cancer. CBS News [serial on the Internet]. 2013 May 3 [cited 2014 Dec 4]. Available from: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/urologists-nolonger-recommend-routine-psatesting-for-prostate-cancer/
5. US Preventive Services Task Force. Breast cancer: screening [Internet]. Rockville (MD): USPSTF; [current as of 2013 Sep; cited 2014 Dec 4]. Available from: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsbrca.htm
6. Mainiero MB, Lourenco A, Mahoney MC, Newell MS, Bailey L, Barke LD, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria breast cancer screening. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013;10(1):11-4.
7. Miller AB, Wall C, Baines CJ, Sun P, To T, Narod SA. Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial. BMJ. 2012;348:g366.
8. Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Clinical guideline for the evaluation, management, and long-term care of obstructive sleep apnea in adults. J Clin Sleep Med. 2009;5(3):263-76.
9. Ungar L. Sleep problems can be assessed via at-home tests.Washington Post. 2013 Dec 9.
10. Ungar L. In-home tests gain traction in sleep disorder diagnoses. USA Today. 2013 Feb 15.
11. Etzioni RD. Review of evidence concerning PSA screening for prostate cancer has limitations as basis for policy development. Evid Based Med. 2013;18(2):75-6.
12. Lord CG, Ross L, Lepper MR. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1979;37(11): 2098-109.
13. Smith GC, Pell JP. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2003;327(7429): 1459-61.
14. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185(4157): 1124-31.
15. Bleyer A, Welch HG. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(21):1998-2005.
16. Ross L. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process. In: Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 10. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1977. p. 173-220.
17. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J Econ Perspect. 1991;5(1): 193-206.
18. Harmon-Jones E, Mills J. Cognitive dissonance: progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 1999.
19. Carter HB, Albertsen PC, Barry MJ, Etzioni R, Freedland SJ, Greene KL, et al. Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2013; 190(2):419-26.
20. Riggs K, Ubel PA. The role of professional societies in limiting indication creep. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Aug 5. [Epub ahead of print].
21. Haverkamp AD, Orleans M, Langendoerfer S, McFee J, Murphy J, Thompson HE. A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;134(4):399-412.
22. Asch DA, Terwiesch C, Mahoney KB, Rosin R. Insourcing health care innovation. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(19):1775-7.