메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 249-252

If a little bit is wrong, how much is alright? Interpreting the significance of small numerators in clinical trials

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; CALCULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DEVICE FAILURE; HUMAN; INTUBATION; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; NULL HYPOTHESIS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROBABILITY; REVIEW; STATISTICS; TREATMENT FAILURE; ANESTHESIOLOGY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; METHODOLOGY; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

EID: 84922746703     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.12980     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (8)

References (8)
  • 1
    • 0020741664 scopus 로고
    • If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators
    • Hanley JA, Lippman-Hand A,. If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators. Journal of the American Medical Association 1983; 249: 1743-5.
    • (1983) Journal of the American Medical Association , vol.249 , pp. 1743-1745
    • Hanley, J.A.1    Lippman-Hand, A.2
  • 4
    • 0000460102 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interval estimation for a binomial proportion
    • Brown L, Cai T, DasGupta A,. Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Statistical Science 2001; 16: 101-17.
    • (2001) Statistical Science , vol.16 , pp. 101-117
    • Brown, L.1    Cai, T.2    Dasgupta, A.3
  • 5
    • 0032377357 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions
    • Agresti A, Coull B,. Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions. American Statistician 1998; 52: 119-26.
    • (1998) American Statistician , vol.52 , pp. 119-126
    • Agresti, A.1    Coull, B.2
  • 6
    • 0032580320 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: Comparison of seven methods
    • Newcombe RG,. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Statistics in Medicine 1998; 17: 857-72.
    • (1998) Statistics in Medicine , vol.17 , pp. 857-872
    • Newcombe, R.G.1
  • 7
    • 84860826369 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • If it hasn't failed, does it work? on the 'worst we can expect' from observational trial results, with reference to airway management devices
    • Pandit JJ,. If it hasn't failed, does it work? On the 'worst we can expect' from observational trial results, with reference to airway management devices. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 578-83.
    • (2012) Anaesthesia , vol.67 , pp. 578-583
    • Pandit, J.J.1
  • 8
    • 0029038116 scopus 로고
    • If almost nothing goes wrong, is almost everything all right? Interpreting small numerators
    • Newman TB,. If almost nothing goes wrong, is almost everything all right? Interpreting small numerators. Journal of the American Medical Association 1995; 274: 1013.
    • (1995) Journal of the American Medical Association , vol.274 , pp. 1013
    • Newman, T.B.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.