Capacitance-modulated transistor detects odorant binding protein chiral interactions

Nature Communications

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Mulla, Mohammad Yusuf ^a   Tuccori, Elena ^b   Magliulo, Maria ^a   Lattanzi, Gianluca ^a   Palazzo, Gerardo ^a   Persaud, Krishna ^b   Torsi, Luisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING PROTEIN; ODORANT BINDING PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ODORANT-BINDING PROTEIN; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; PROTEIN BINDING;

BIOCHEMISTRY; CHEMICAL BINDING; ENERGY BALANCE; LIGAND; PROTEIN; THERMODYNAMICS;

ARTICLE; CAPACITANCE MODULATED TRANSISTOR; CHIRALITY; ENANTIOMER; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SEMICONDUCTOR; CHEMISTRY; ELECTRIC CAPACITANCE; METABOLISM; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; STEREOISOMERISM;

ELECTRIC CAPACITANCE; PROTEIN BINDING; RECEPTORS, ODORANT; STEREOISOMERISM; TRANSISTORS, ELECTRONIC;

EID: 84922746107     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7010     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Meierhenrich, U. J., Golebiowski, J., Fernandez, X. & Cabrol-Bass, D. The molecular basis of olfactory chemoreception. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 6410-6412 (2004).
2. Buck, L. & Axel, R. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 65, 175-187 (1991).
3. Pevsner, F., Sklar, P. B., Hwang, P. M. & Snyder, S. H. Odorant-binding protein. sequence analysis and localization suggest an odorant transport function. Chem. Senses 1, 227-242 (1989).
4. Tegoni, M. et al. Mammalian odorant binding proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1482, 229-240 (2000).
5. Pelosi, P. Odorant-binding proteins. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 29, 199-228 (1994).
6. Bignetti, E. et al. Specificity of an immunoaffinity column for odorant-binding protein from bovine nasal mucosa. Chem. Senses 12, 601-608 (1987).
7. Pevsner, J., Hou, V., Snowman, A. M. & Snyder, S. H. Odorant-binding protein. Characterization of ligand binding. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 6118-6125 (1990).
8. Xu, P., Atkinson, R., Jones, D. N. M. & Smith, D. P. Drosophila OBP LUSH is required for activity of pheromone-sensitive neurons. Neuron 45, 193-200 (2005).
9. Matsuo, T., Sugaya, S., Yasukawa, J., Aigaki, T. & Fuyama, Y. Odorant-binding proteins OBP57d and OBP57e affect taste perception and host-plant preference in Drosophila Sechellia. PLoS Biol. 5, e118 (2007).
10. Swarup, S., Williams, T. I. & Anholt, R. R. H. Functional dissection of odorant binding protein genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Brain Behav. 10, 648-657 (2011).
11. Mao, Y. et al. Crystal and solution structures of an odorant-binding protein from the southern house mosquito complexed with an oviposition pheromone. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19102-19107 (2010).
12. Pelosi, P., Mastrogiacomo, R., Iovinella, I., Tuccori, E. & Persaud, K. Structure and biotechnological applications of odorant-binding proteins. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 61-70 (2014).
13. Spinelli, S. et al. the structure of the monomeric porcine odorant binding protein sheds light on the domain swapping mechanism. Biochemistry 37, 7913-7918 (1998).
14. Vincent, F. et al. Complexes of porcine odorant binding protein with odorant molecules belonging to different chemical classes. J. Mol. Biol. 300, 127-139 (2000).
15. Paolini, S. et al. Amino acid sequence, post-translational modifications, binding and labelling of porcine odorant-binding protein. Chem. Senses 23, 689-698 (1998).
16. Lambert, J., Compton, R. N. & Crawford, T. D. The optical activity of carvone: a theoretical and experimental investigation. J. Chem. Phys. 136, 114512 (2012).
17. Torsi, L., Magliulo, M., Manoli, K. & Palazzo, G. Organic field-effect transistor sensors: a tutorial review. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 8612-8628 (2013).
18. Angione, M. D. et al. Interfacial electronic effects in functional biolayers integrated into organic field-effect transistors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 109, 6429-6434 (2012).
19. Torsi, L. et al. A sensitivity-enhanced field-effect chiral sensor. Nat. Mater. 7, 412-417 (2008).
20. Kergoat, L. et al. A water-gate organic field-effect transistor. Adv. Mater. 22, 2565-2569 (2010).
21. Kim, T. H. et al. Single-carbon-atomic-resolution detection of odorant molecules using a human olfactory receptor-based bioelectronic nose. Adv. Mater. 21, 91-94 (2009).
22. Yoon, H. et al. Polypyrrole nanotubes conjugated with human olfactory receptors: high-performance transducer for FET-type bioelectronic nose. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 2755-2758 (2009).
23. Magliulo, M. et al. Sensors: electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistor sensors based on supported biotinylated phospholipid bilayer. Adv. Mater. 25, 1958-1958 (2013).
24. Dumitru, L. M. et al. Plain poly(acrylic acid) gated organic field-effect transistors on a flexible substrate. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 10819-10823 (2013).
25. Sze, S. M. & Kwok, K. N. G. Physics of Semiconductor Devices 3rd edn 293 (Wiley, 2007).
26. Casalini, S., Leonardi, F., Cramer, T. & Biscarini, F. Organic field-effect transistor for label-free dopamine sensing. Org. Electron. 14, 156-163 (2013).
27. Lai, S. et al. Ultralow voltage, OTFT-based sensor for label-free DNA detection. Adv. Mater. 25, 103-107 (2013).
28. Bergveld, P. Development, operation, and application of the ion-sensitive field-effect transistor as a tool for electrophysiology. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 19, 342-351 (1972).
29. Bard, A. J. & Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical Methods: fundamentals and Applications 2nd Edition 79 (Wiley, 2001).
30. Janata, J. & Josowicz, M. Chemical modulation of work function as a transduction mechanism for chemical sensors. Acc. Chem. Res. 31, 241-248 (1998).
31. Evans, D. F. & Wennestrom, H. in The Colloidal Domain: where Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Technology Meet. Ch. 3 (VCH, 1994).
32. Rivnay, J., Owens, R. M. & Malliaras, G. G. The rise of organic bioelectronics. Chem. Mater. 26, 679-685 (2014).
33. Bernards, D. A. et al. Enzymatic sensing with organic electrochemical transistors. J. Mater. Chem. 18, 116-120 (2008).
34. Kukic, P. et al. Protein dielectric constants determined from NMR chemical shift perturbations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 16968-16976 (2013).
35. Dodabalapur, A., Torsi, L. & Katz, H. E. Organic transistors: two-dimensional transport and improved electrical characteristics. Science 268, 270-271 (1995).
36. Laiho, A., Herlogsson, L., Forchheimer, R., Crispin, X. & Berggren, M. Controlling the dimensionality of charge transport in organic thin-film transistors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 108, 15069-15073 (2011).
37. Porrazzo, R., Bellani, S., Luzio, A., Lanzarini, E., Caironi, M. & Antognazza, M. R. Improving mobility and electrochemical stability of a water gated polymer field-effect transistor. Org. Electron. 15, 2126-2134 (2014).
38. Ishikawa, F. N. et al. A calibration method for nanowire biosensors to suppress device-to-device variation. ACS Nano 3, 3969-3976 (2009).
39. Dill, K. A. & Bromberg, S. in Molecular Driving Forces : Statistical Thermodynamics in Chemistry & Biology. Ch. 27-28 (Garland Science, 2003).
40. Wattanakit, C. et al. Enantioselective recognition at mesoporous chiral metal surfaces. Nat. Commun. 5, 3325 (2014).
41. Pernites, R. B., Venkata, S. K., Tiu, B. D. B., Yago, A. C. C. & Advincula, R. C. Nanostructured, molecularly imprinted, and template-patterned polythiophenes for chiral sensing and differentiation. Small 8, 1669-1674 (2012).
42. Guo, L. et al. Discrimination of enantiomers based on LSPR biosensors fabricated with weak enantioselective and non selective receptors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 47, 199-205 (2013).
43. Xu, L. et al. Highly selective recognition and ultrasensitive quantification of enantiomers. J. Mater. Chem. B 1, 4478-4483 (2013).
44. Oliviero, G., Federici, S., Colombi, P. & Bergese, P. On the difference of equilibrium constants of DNA hybridization in bulk solution and at the solid-solution interface. J. Mol. Recognit. 24, 182-187 (2011).
45. Stepanenko, O. V. et al. Hydrophobic interactions and ionic networks play an important role in thermal stability and denaturation mechanism of the porcine odorant-binding protein. Proteins 71, 35-44 (2008).
46. Wei, Y., Brandazza, A. & Pelosi, P. Binding of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to mutants of odorant-binding protein: a first step towards biosensors for environmental monitoring. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1784, 666-671 (2008).
47. Lautenschlager, C., Leal, W. S. & Clardy, J. Coil-to-helix transition and ligand release of Bombyx mori pheromone-binding protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 335, 1044-1050 (2005).
48. ProtParam tool from ExPASy Tools http://web.expasy.org/protparam/.
49. Pelosi, P. & Viti, R. Specific anosmia to l-carvone: the minty primary odour. Chem. Senses 3, 331-337 (1978).
50. Meillour, P. N. et al. Phenylalanine 35 and tyrosine 82 are involved in the uptake and release of ligand by porcine odorant-binding protein. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1794, 1142-1150 (2009).
51. Zhang, S. et al. Binding characterization of recombinant odorant-binding proteins from the parasitic wasp, microplitis mediator (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 37, 189-194 (2011).
52. Techane, S., Baer, D. R. & Castner, D. G. Simulation and modeling of selfassembled monolayers of carboxylic acid thiols on flat and nanoparticle gold surfaces. Anal. Chem. 83, 6704-6712 (2011).