Coding Social Interaction: A Heretical Approach in Conversation Analysis?

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-19

  Stivers, Tanya ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922699101     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08351813.2015.993837     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Atkinson, J. M. (1983). Two devices for generating audience approval: A comparative study of public discourse and texts. In K. Ehlich & H. V. Riemsdijk (Eds.), Connectedness in sentence, text and discourse (Vol. 4, pp. 199–236). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg Studies in Language and Literature.
2. Atkinson, J. M. (1984a). Our masters’ voices: The language and body language of politics. London, England: Methuen.
3. Atkinson, J. M. (1984b). Public speaking and audience responses: Some techniques for inviting applause. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 370–409). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Atkinson, J. M. 1985. Refusing invited applause: Preliminary observations from a case study of charismatic oratory. In T. V. Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol 3: Discourse and dialogue) (pp. 161–181). London, England: Academic Press.
5. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Clayman, S. E., Heritage, J., Elliott, M., & McDonald, L. (2007). When does the watchdog bark? Conditions of aggressive questioning in presidential news conferences. American Sociological Review,72, 23–41. doi:10.1177/000312240707200102
7. Curl, T. S. (2006). Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics,38, 1257–1280. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.004
8. Dunbar, R. I. M., Duncan, N. D. C., & Nettle, D. (1995). Size and structure of freely forming conversational groups. Human Nature,6(1), 67–78. doi:10.1007/BF02734136
9. Dunbar, R. I. M., Marriott, A., & Duncan, N. D. C. (1997). Human conversational behavior. Human Nature,8(3), 231–246. doi:10.1007/BF02912493
10. Duxbury, J. A., Wright, K. M., Hart, A., Bradley, D., Roach, P., Harris, N., & Carter, B. (2010). A structured observation of the interaction between nurses and patients during the administration of medication in an acute mental health unit. Journal of Clinical Nursing,19, 2481–2492. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03291.x
11. Glenn, P. (2003). Laughter in interaction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12. Heatherington, L., & Friedlander, M. L. (1990). Complementarity and symmetry in family therapy communication. Journal of Counseling Psychology,37(3), 261–268. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.37.3.261
13. Heritage, J. (1984a). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 299–345). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Heritage, J. (1984b). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
15. Heritage, J. (1998). Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society,27(3), 291–334. doi:10.1017/S0047404500019990
16. Heritage, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: Practices and methods. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative sociology (3rd ed., pp. 208–230). London, England: Sage.
17. Heritage, J., Boyd, E. A., & Kleinman, L. (2001). Subverting criteria: The role of precedent in decisions to finance surgery. Sociology of Health and Illness,23(5), 701–728. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.00272
18. Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2013). The changing tenor of questioning over time: Tracking a question form across US presidential news conferences, 1953–2000. Journalism Practice,7(4), 481–501. doi:10.1080/17512786.2013.802485
19. Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (1986). Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology,92(1), 110–157. doi:10.1086/228465
20. Heritage, J., Robinson, J. D., Elliott, M. N., Beckett, M., & Wilkes, M. (2007). Reducing patients’ unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can make. Journal of General Internal Medicine,22(10), 1429–1433. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0279-0
21. Heritage, J., & Stivers, T. (1999). Online commentary in acute medical visits: A method of shaping patient expectations. Social Science and Medicine,49, 1501–1517. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00219-1
22. Jefferson, G. (1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 346–369). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. Jefferson, G. (2004). A note on laughter in “male-female” interaction. Discourse Studies,6(1), 117–133. doi:10.1177/1461445604039445
24. Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 152–205). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
25. Kidwell, M. (2005). Gaze as social control: How very young children differentiate “The look” from a “Mere look” by their adult caregivers. Research on Language and Social Interaction,38, 417–449. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3804_2
26. Kniffin, K. M., & Wilson, D. S. (2005). Utilities of gossip across organizational levels: Multilevel selection, free-riders, and teams. Human Nature,16(3), 278–292. doi:10.1007/s12110-005-1011-6
27. Lerner, G. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society,32, 177–201. doi:10.1017/S004740450332202X
28. Mangione-Smith, R., Elliott, M. N., Stivers, T., McDonald, L. L., & Heritage, J. (2006). Ruling out the need for antibiotics: Are we sending the right message? Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine,160, 945–952. doi:10.1001/archpedi.160.9.945
29. Mangione-Smith, R., Stivers, T., Elliott, M. N., McDonald, L., & Heritage, J. (2003). Online commentary during the physical examination: A communication tool for avoiding inappropriate antibiotic prescribing? Social Science and Medicine,56, 313–320. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00029-1
30. Mehu, M., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008). Naturalistic observations of smiling and laughter in human group interactions. Behaviour,145(12), 1747–1780. doi:10.1163/156853908786279619
31. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Ratanawongsa, N., Korthuis, P. T., Saha, S., Roter, D., Moore, R. D., Sharp, V. L., & Beach, M. C. (2012). Clinician stress and patient clinician communication in HIV care. Journal of General Internal Medicine,27. doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2157-7
33. Robinson, J. D., & Heritage, J. (2014). Intervening with conversation analysis: The case of medicine. Research on Language and Social Interaction,47, 201–218. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.925658
34. Rossano, F. (2012). Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Ipskamp Drukkers.
35. Rossano, F., Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Gaze, questioning and culture. In J. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives (pp. 187–249). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36. Roter, D., & Larson, S. (2002). The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): Utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Education and Counseling,46(4), 243–251. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00012-5
37. Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 54–69). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
38. Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (2007 [1979]). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons and their interaction. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives (pp. 23–28). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language,50, 696–735. doi:10.2307/412243
40. Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist,70, 1075–1095. doi:10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
41. Schegloff, E. A. (1980). Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I Ask You a question?”. Sociological Inquiry,50, 104–152. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00018.x
42. Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 28–52). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
43. Schegloff, E. A. (1996a). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology,102(1), 161–216. doi:10.1086/230911
44. Schegloff, E. A. (1996b). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In B. Fox (Ed.), Studies in anaphora (pp. 437–485). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
45. Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Third turn repair. In G. R. Guy, C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin, & J. Bough (Eds.), Towards a social science of language: Papers in honor of William Labov. (Vol. 2, pp. 31–40). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
46. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language,53, 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
47. Stivers, T. (2002). Presenting the problem in pediatric encounters: “Symptoms only” versus “candidate diagnosis” presentations. Health Communication,14(3), 299–338. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1403_2
48. Stivers, T. (2007). Alternative recognitionals in person reference. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives (pp. 73–96). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49. Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction,41, 31–57. doi:10.1080/08351810701691123
50. Stivers, T., & Enfield, N. J. (2010). A coding scheme for question-response sequences in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics,42, 2620–2626. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002
51. Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., … Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,106(26), 10587–10592. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903616106
52. Stivers, T., & Hayashi, M. (2010). Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints. Language in Society,39(1), 1–38. doi:10.1017/S0047404509990637
53. Stivers, T., & Majid, A. (2007). Questioning children: Interactional evidence of implicit bias in medical interviews. Social Psychology Quarterly,70, 424–441. doi:10.1177/019027250707000410
54. Stivers, T., Mangione-Smith, R., Elliott, M. N., McDonald, L., & Heritage, J. (2003). Why do physicians think parents expect antibiotics? What parents report vs what physicians perceive. The Journal of Family Practice,52(2), 140–148.
55. Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society,35(3), 367–392. doi:10.1017/S0047404506060179
56. Stivers, T., & Rossano, F (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and social interaction,43, 1–31.