Movement preparation improves touch perception without awareness

Cognition

Volumn 137, Issue , 2015, Pages 189-195

  van Ede, Freek ^a   van Doren, Thomas I ^a   Damhuis, Jochem ^a   de Lange, Floris P ^a   Maris, Eric ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attention; Awareness; Movement; Preparation; Somatosensory; Touch

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BODY REGIONS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; THUMB; TOUCH; ADOLESCENT; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TOUCH; TOUCH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84922690316     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.009     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baldauf D., Deubel H. Attentional landscapes in reaching and grasping. Vision Research 2010, 50:999-1013.
2. Blakemore S-J., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.M. Spatiotemporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11:551-559.
3. Cavanagh P., Hunt A.R., Afraz A., Rolfs M. Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14:147-153.
4. Chapman C.E., Beauchamp E.J. Differential controls over tactile detection in humans by motor commands and peripheral reafference. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 96:1664-1675.
5. Clark A. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2013, 36:181-204.
6. Deubel H., Schneider W.X. Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research 1996, 36:1827-1837.
7. Eimer M., Forster B., Velzen J.V., Prabhu G. Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional shifts: ERP evidence for the premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:957-966.
8. Forster B., Eimer M. Covert unimanual response preparation triggers attention shifts to effectors rather than goal locations. Neuroscience Letters 2007, 419:142-146.
9. Friston K., Kiebel S. Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2009, 364:1211-1221.
10. Jones S.R., Kerr C.E., Wan Q., Pritchett D.L., Hamalainen M., Moore C.I. Cued spatial attention drives functionally relevant modulation of the mu rhythm in primary somatosensory cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:13760-13765.
11. Juravle G., Deubel H. Action preparation enhances the processing of tactile targets. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 198:301-311.
12. Juravle G., Deubel H., Spence C. Attention and suppression affect tactile perception in reach-to-grasp movements. Acta Psychologica 2011, 138:302-310.
13. Paradiso G., Cunic D., Saint-Cyr J.A., Hoque T., Lozano A.M., Lang A.E., et al. Involvement of human thalamus in the preparation of self-paced movement. Brain 2004, 127:2717-2731.
14. Pfurtscheller G., Lopes da Silva F.H. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology 1999, 110:1842-1857.
15. Rizzolatti G., Riggio L., Dascola I., Umiltá C. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 1987, 25:31-40.
16. Rolfs M., Carrasco M. Rapid simultaneous enhancement of visual sensitivity and perceived contrast during saccade preparation. The Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32:13744-13752.
17. Rolfs M., Lawrence B.M., Carrasco M. Reach preparation enhances visual performance and appearance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2013, 368:20130057.
18. Shergill S.S., Bays P.M., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.M. Two eyes for an eye: The neuroscience of force escalation. Science 2003, 301:187.
19. van Ede F., de Lange F.P., Maris E. Attentional cues affect accuracy and reaction time via different cognitive and neural processes. The Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32:10408-10412.
20. van Ede F., Köster M., Maris E. Beyond establishing involvement: Quantifying the contribution of anticipatory α- and β-band suppression to perceptual improvement with attention. Journal of Neurophysiology 2012, 108:2352-2362.
21. van Ede F., Maris E. Somatosensory demands modulate muscular beta oscillations, independent of motor demands. The Journal of Neuroscience 2013, 33:10849-10857.
22. Voss J., Ingram J.N., Haggard P., Wolpert D.M. Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement. Nature Neuroscience 2006, 9:26-27.
23. Wolpert D.M., Flanagan J.R. Motor prediction. Current Biology 2001, 11:R729-R732.
24. Zagha E., Casale A.E., Sachdev R.N., McGinley M.J., McCormick D.A. Motor cortex feedback influences sensory processing by modulating network state. Neuron 2013, 79:567-578.