Widespread non-adherence to evidence-based maternity care guidelines: A population-based cluster randomised household survey

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 122, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 238-247

  Nagpal, J ^a   Sachdeva, A ^a   Sengupta Dhar, R ^a   Bhargava, V L ^a   Bhartia, A ^a  

^a SITARAM BHARTIA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

Caesarean rate; evidence based medicine; India; maternity care; quality of care; survey

Indexed keywords

ENEMA; INFUSION FLUID; IRON;

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EPISIOTOMY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HAIR; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HOME DELIVERY; HUMAN; INCOME; INDIAN; LABOR SUPPORT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL CARE; PEER REVIEW; PILOT STUDY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRENATAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE HOSPITAL; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; TETANUS PROPHYLAXIS; WARD; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FLUID THERAPY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH SERVICE; INDIA; LABOR; LABOR INDUCTION; PERINATAL CARE; PREGNANCY; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTILIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ENEMA; EPISIOTOMY; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HOME CHILDBIRTH; HOSPITALS, PRIVATE; HOSPITALS, PUBLIC; HUMANS; INDIA; LABOR, INDUCED; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; PAIN MANAGEMENT; PERINATAL CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL; URBAN HEALTH SERVICES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84922674451     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13054     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Hulton L, Matthews Z, Stones RW,. A Framework for the Evaluation of Quality of Care in Maternity Services. Southampton, UK: University of Southampton, 2000.
2. Nagpal J, Bhartia A,. Quality of diabetes care in the middle- and high-income group populace: the Delhi Diabetes Community (DEDICOM) survey. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 2341-8.
3. Proctor S,. What determines quality in maternity care? Comparing the perceptions of childbearing women and midwives. Birth 1998; 25: 85-93.
4. Hundley V, Penney G, Fitzmaurice A, van Teijlingen E, Graham W,. A comparison of data obtained from service providers and service users to assess the quality of maternity care. Midwifery 2002; 18: 26-35.
5. Roberts CL, Tracy S, Peat B,. Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia: population based descriptive study. BMJ 2000; 15: 137-41.
6. Sakala C, Corry MP,. Listening to Mothers II reveals maternity care quality chasm. J Midwifery Womens Health 2007; 52: 183-5.
7. Lothian JA,. Listening to Mothers-The First National U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences. J Perinat Educ 2003; 12: vi-viii.
8. Sanneving L, Trygg N, Saxena D, Mavalankar D, Thomsen S,. Inequity in India: the case of maternal and reproductive health. Glob Health Action 2013; 6: 19145.
9. International Institute for Population Sciences. India National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06 (Vol. 1). 2007. International Institute for Population Sciences. [ www.rchiips.org/nfhs/NFHS-3%20Data/Delhi-printed-version-for-website.pdf ]. Accessed 22 April 2013.
10. The District Level Household and Facility Survey-3 2007-08. [ www.rchiips.org/pdf/rch3/report/DL.pdf ]. Accessed 22 April 2013.
11. Lincetto O, Mothebesoane-Anoh S, Gomez P, Munjanja SP,. Antenatal care. In:, Lake J, Kerber K, editors. Opportunities for Africa's Newborns: Practical Data, Policy and Programmatic Support for Newborn Care in Africa. Cape Town: PMNCH; 2006. [ www.who.int/pmnch/media/publications/africanewborns/en/webcite ]. Accessed 31 March 2013.
12. Guidelines for Pregnancy Care and Management of Common Obstetric Complications by Medical Officers. Maternal Health Division Department of Family Welfare Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Government of India 2005: 1-173.
13. National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care (UK). Postnatal Care: Routine Postnatal Care of Women and Their Babies. London: Royal College of General Practitioners (UK); 2006.
14. NICE. Intrapartum care: consultation-NICE guideline Intrapartum care: consultation-NICE guideline. 2007; 1-55.
15. Antenatal care. nice.org.uk. [ www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11947/40115/40115.pdf ]. Accessed 17 April 2013.
16. Carroli G, Mignini L,. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(1): CD000081.
17. WHO. Care in Normal Birth: A Practical Guide. Geneva: WHO, 1996. [ https://apps.who.int/rht/documents/MSM96-24/msm9624.htm ]. Accessed 22 April 2013.
18. Sreevidya S, Sathiyasekaran B,. High caesarean rates in Madras (India): a population-based cross sectional study. BJOG 2003; 110: 106-11.
19. Dhar RS, Nagpal J, Bhargava V, Sachdeva A, Bhartia A,. Quality of care, maternal attitude and common physician practices across the socio-economic spectrum: a community survey. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 282: 245-54. [ http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed%26id=19727783%26retmode=ref%26cmd=prlinks ]. Accessed 19 March 2013.
20. Census of India 2011: NCT of Delhi. [ www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/hlo/Data-sheet/delhi/Conditions-Ownership.pdf ]. Accessed 15 June 2014.
21. India D, Kumar AKS, Chandra R, Banerjee R, Program B,. Delhi Human Development Report 2006. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006.
22. Mukherjee SN,. Rising caesarean section rate. J Obstet Gynecol India 2006; 56: 298-300.
23. Garg P, Nagpal J,. A review of literature to understand the complexity of equity, ethics and management for achieving public health goals in India. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: 1.
24. Property Tax Classification of Colonies in Delhi. Property Tax Department Municipal Corporation of Delhi. [ http://mcdpropertytax.in/colonylist.php ]. Accessed 22 April 2013.
25. Raj D,. The use of systematic sampling with probability proportionate to size in a large scale survey. J Am Stat Assoc 1964; 59: 251-5.
26. Kumar N, Shekhar C, Kumar P, Kundu AS,. Kuppuswamy's socioeconomic status scale-updating for 2007. Indian J Pediatr 2007; 74: 1131-2.
27. Lardi AM, Hirst C, Mortimer AJ, McCollum CN,. Evaluation of the HemoCue for measuring intra-operative haemoglobin concentrations: a comparison with the Coulter Max-M. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 349-52.
28. Rai SK, Anand K, Misra P, Kant S, Upadhyay RP,. Public health approach to address maternal mortality. Indian J Public Health 2012; 56: 196-203.
29. Ismail SI,. An audit of NICE guidelines on antenatal pelvic floor exercises. Int Urogynecol J 2009; 20: 1417-22.
30. Nooh A, Baghdadi S, Raouf S,. Induction of labour: how close to the evidence-based guidelines are we? J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 451-4.
31. d'Orsi E, Chor D, Giffin K, Angulo-Tuesta A, Barbosa GP, de Gama A,. National Maternity Hospital Holles Street Annual Report (nmh.ie). [ www.nmh.ie/-fileupload/Annual%20Reports/NMH2011%20Final%20New.pdf ]. Accessed 18 April 2013.
32. Barbosad ADSG, Reisd AC, Hartzf Z,. Qualidade da atenção ao parto em maternidades do Rio de Janeiro. Rev Saúde Pública 2005; 2005: 646-54.
33. Reproductive & Child Health Programme Phase II, 2007. [ http://mohfw.nic.in/NRHM/Documents/Final-Aide-Memoire-JRM3.pdf ]. Accessed 22 April 2013.
34. National Population Policy, 2000 (mohfw.nic.in). [ http://mohfw.nic.in/NRHM/Documents/national-Population-Policy-2000.pdf ]. Accessed 18 April 2013.
35. Kumar D, Agarwal N, Swami HM,. Socio-demographic correlates of breast-feeding in urban slums of Chandigarh. Indian J Med Sci 2006; 60: 461-6.
36. Infant and Young Child Feeding Chapter, Indian Academy of Pediatrics, Rajeshwari K, Bang A, Chaturvedi P, Kumar V, et al. Infant and young child feeding guidelines: 2010. Indian Pediatr 2010; 47: 995-1004.
37. Grimes DA, Schulz KF,. Uses and abuses of screening tests. Lancet 2002; 359: 881-4.
38. Parry S, Severs CP, Sehdev HM, Macones GA, White LM, Morgan MA,. Ultrasonographic prediction of fetal macrosomia. Association with cesarean delivery. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 17-22.
39. McCusker J, Harris DR, Hosmer DW Jr,. Association of electronic fetal monitoring during labor with cesarean section rate and with neonatal morbidity and mortality. Am J Public Health 1988; 1988: 1170-4.
40. Zelop C, Heffner LJ,. The downside of cesarean delivery: short and long term complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004; 47: 386-93.
41. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 2006; 367: 1819-29.
42. Chaimay B, Woradet S,. Does prenatal ultrasound exposure influence the development of children? Asia Pac J Public Health 2008; 20: 31-8.
43. Abramowicz Jacques S,. Ultrasound and autism association, link, or coincidence? J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 1261-9.
44. de Jonge A, van der Goes BY, Ravelli AC, Amelink-Verburg MP, Mol BW, Nijhuis JG, et al. Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529 688 low-risk planned home and hospital births. BJOG 2009; 2009: 1177-84.
45. Johnson KC, Daviss BA,. Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America. BMJ 2005; 330: 1416.
46. Mavalankar D, Vora K, Prakasamma M,. Achieving millennium development Goal 5: is India serious? Bull World Health Organ 2008; 2008: 243-243A.
47. Hatem M, Sandall J, Devane D, Soltani H, Gates S,. Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 4: CD004667.