A comparison of data obtained from service providers and service users to assess the quality of maternity care

Midwifery

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 126-135

  Hundley, V ^a   Penney, G ^b   Fitzmaurice, A ^b   VanTeijlingen, E ^b   Graham, W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MATERNAL CARE; MATERNAL WELFARE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MEDICAL STAFF; MIDWIFE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; HEALTH SERVICE; METHODOLOGY; NURSING; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; STANDARD; STATISTICS; UNITED KINGDOM;

CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; NURSING AUDIT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCOTLAND;

EID: 0036614908     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/midw.2002.0306     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Audit Commission and Institute of Child Health 1996 Maternity care survey. Audit Commission/Institute of Child Health, Bristol
2. Cartwright A 1979 The dignity of labour: a study of childbearing and induction. Tavistock, London
3. Cartwright A, Smith C 1979 Some comparisons of data from medical records and from interviews with women who had recently had a live birth or still birth. Journal of Biosocial Science 11: 49-64
4. Clinical Resource and Audit Group (CRAG) and the Scottish Health Management Efficiency Group (SCOTMEG) Working group on maternity services 1996 Final report. CRAG, Edinburgh
5. Department of Health (DOH) 1993 Changing childbirth report of the expert maternity group HMSO, London
6. Department of Health (DOH) 1998 A first class service: quality in the new NHS. HMSO, London
7. Department of Health (DOH) 2000 Service delivery agreement. Department of Health, London
8. Eccles M, Ford GA, Duggan S et al. 1999 Are postal questionnaire surveys of reported activity valid? An exploration using general practitioner management of hypertension in older people. British Journal of General Practice 49: 35-38
9. Hundley V 2001 Determining success in the provision of maternity care. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen
10. Hundley V, Milne J, Glazener C et al. 1997 Satisfaction and the three C's-continuity, choice and control - women's views from a randomised controlled trial of midwife-led care. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 104: 1273-1280
11. Hundley V, Rennie AM, Fitzmaurice A et al. 2000 A national survey of women's views of their maternity care. Midwifery 16 (4): 303-313
12. Joffe M, Grisco JA 1985 Comparison of antenatal records with retrospective interviewing. Journal of Biosocial Science 17: 113-119
13. Lincoln YS, and Guba E 1985 Naturalistic enquiry. Sage, Beverley Hills, CA
14. Martin C 1987 Monitoring maternity services by postal questionnaire: congruity between mothers' reports and their obstetric records. Statistics in Medicine 6: 613-627
15. NHS Executive 1999 Patient and public involvement in the new NHS. NHSE, London
16. Norusis MJ 1997 SPSS for Windows. 7.5. Reference Manuals. SPSS Inc., Chicago
17. Porter M, Macintyre S 1989 'What is, must be best': a research note on conservative or deferential responses to antenatal care provision. Social Science and Medicine 19: 1197-1200
18. Scottish Consumer Council 1999 Putting partnership into practice: involving the public in primary care. Scottish Health Executive, Edinburgh
19. Scottish Executive Health Department 1999 Designed to involve: public involvement in the primary care structures. Scottish Executive Health Department, Edinburgh
20. Scottish Executive Health Department 2001 A framework for maternity services in Scotland. Tactica Solutions, Edinburgh
21. Scottish Health Advisory Service 1997 The Scottish Office. Advocacy: a guide to good practice. The Stationary Office, Edinburgh
22. Scottish Office Home and Health Department (SOHHD) 1993 Provision of maternity services in Scotland. A Policy Review. HMSO, Edinburgh
23. Scottish Office, Department of Health 1997 Designed to care: renewing the National Health Service in Scotland. The Stationary Office, Edinburgh
24. Scottish Programme for Clinical Effectiveness in Reproductive Health (SPCERH) 1999 Maternity care matters: an audit of maternity services in Scotland 1998. SPCERH Publication Number 9. SPCERH, Aberdeen
25. Sitzia J and Wood N 1997 Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Social Science and Medicine 45 (12): 1829-1843
26. van Teijlingen E, Rennie AM, Hundley V et al. 2001 The importance of conducting and reporting pilot studies: the example of the Scottish Births Survey, Journal of Advanced Nursing 34: 289-295
27. Walker JM, Hall S, Thomas M 1995 The experience of labour: a perspective from those receiving care in a midwife-led unit. Midwifery 11: 120-129