Improving the reactivity of kraft-based dissolving pulp for viscose rayon production by mechanical treatments

Cellulose

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 3647-3654

  Tian, Chao ^a,b,c   Zheng, Linqiang ^b   Miao, Qingxian ^b,d   Cao, Chunyu ^c   Ni, Yonghao ^a,b  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^c CHINA NATIONAL PULP AND PAPER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (China)

^d FUJIAN AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cellulose; Dissolving pulp; Fock reactivity; Grinding; Refining; Specific surface area

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; DISSOLUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GRINDING (MACHINING); RAYON; REFINING; SPECIFIC SURFACE AREA;

CELLULOSE STRUCTURES; DISSOLVING PULP; FIBER MORPHOLOGY; GRINDING TREATMENT; INTRINSIC VISCOSITY; MECHANICAL TREATMENTS; PROCESSABILITY; VISCOSE RAYONS;

PULP REFINING;

CELLULOSE; DISSOLVING PULPS; E I S; GRINDING; RAYON; REFINING; SPECIFIC SURFACE;

EID: 84922641913     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-014-0332-1     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aimin T, Hongwei Z, Gang C, Guohui X, Wenzhi L (2005) Influence of ultrasound treatment on accessibility and regioselective oxidation reactivity of cellulose. Ultrason Sonochem 12(6): 467-472. doi: 10. 1016/j. ultsonch. 2004. 07. 003.
2. Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour Technol 101(13): 4851-4861. doi: 10. 1016/j. biortech. 2009. 11. 093.
3. Bhardwaj NK, Hoang V, Nguyen KL (2007) Effect of refining on pulp surface charge accessible to polydadmac and FTIR characteristic bands of high yield kraft fibres. Bioresour Technol 98(4): 962-966. doi: 10. 1016/j. biortech. 2006. 03. 001.
4. Bismarck A, Aranberri-Askargorta I, Springer J (2002) Surface characterization of flax, hemp and cellulose fibers; surface properties and the water uptake behavior. Polym Compos 23(5): 872-894.
5. Bui HM, Lenninger M, Manian AP, Abu-Rous M, Schimper CB, Schuster KC, Bechtold T (2008) Treatment in swelling solutions modifying cellulose fiber reactivity-Part 2: accessibility and reactivity. Macromol Symp 262(1): 50-64. doi: 10. 1002/masy. 200850206.
6. Christoffersson KE (2005) Dissolving pulp: multivariate characterisation and analysis of reactivity and spectroscopic properties. Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
7. Christoffersson KE, Sjöström M, Edlund U, Lindgren Å, Dolk M (2002) Reactivity of dissolving pulp: characterisation using chemical properties, NMR spectroscopy and multivariate data analysis. Cellulose 9(2): 159-170.
8. Ciolacu D, Ciolacu F, Popa V (2011) Amorphous cellulose-structure and characterization. Cellul Chem Technol 45(1-2): 13-21.
9. Dupon A-L (2003) Gelatine sizing of paper and its impact on the degradation of cellulose during aging: a study using size-exclusion chromatography. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
10. Engström A-C, Ek M, Henriksson G (2006) Improved accessibility and reactivity of dissolving pulp for the viscose process pretreatment with monocomponent endoglucanase. Biomacromolecules 7(6): 2027-2031.
11. Fan J, Li Y (2012) Maximizing the yield of nanocrystalline cellulose from cotton pulp fiber. Carbohydr Polym 88(4): 1184-1188. doi: 10. 1016/j. carbpol. 2012. 01. 081.
12. Filpponen I, Argyropoulos DS (2008) Determination of cellulose reactivity by using phosphitylation and quantitative 31P NMR spectroscopy. Ind Eng Chem Res 47: 8906-8910.
13. Gehmayr V, Sixta H (2012) Pulp properties and their influence on enzymatic degradability. Biomacromolecules 13(3): 645-651.
14. Gehmayr V, Potthast A, Sixta H (2012) Reactivity of dissolving pulps modified by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Cellulose 19(4): 1125-1134. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-012-9729-x.
15. Han SO, Choi HY (2010) Morphology and surface properties of natural fiber treated with electron beam. Microsc Sci Technol Appl Educ 3: 1880-1887.
16. He B (2010) Paper making principles and engineering, 3rd edn. China Light Industry Press, Beijing.
17. Henriksson G, Christiernin M, Agnemo R (2005) Monocomponent endoglucanase treatment increases the reactivity of softwood sulphite dissolving pulp. Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 32: 211-214.
18. Ibarra D, Köpcke V, Larsson PT, Jaaskelainen AS, Ek M (2010) Combination of alkaline and enzymatic treatments as a process for upgrading sisal paper-grade pulp to dissolving-grade pulp. Bioresour Technol 101(19): 7416-7423.
19. Isogai T, Yanagisawa M, Isogai A (2008) Degrees of polymerization (DP) and DP distribution of cellouronic acids prepared from alkali-treated celluloses and ball-milled native celluloses by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Cellulose 16(1): 117-127. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-008-9245-1.
20. Kelsey RG, Shafizadeh F (1980) Enhancement of cellulose accessibility and enzymatic hydrolysis by simultaneous wet milling. Biotechnol Bioeng 22(5): 1025-1036.
21. Kim CH, Yang JK, Park JY (2000) Quantification of crystallinity change in celluloses during refining. J Korea TAPPI 32(5): 8-13.
22. Kline E (1954) Xanthates. In: Ott E, Spurlin HM, Grafflin MW (eds) Cellulose and cellulose derivatives, vol V. Interscience Publishers Inc., New York.
23. Köpcke V (2010) Conversion of wood and non-wood paper-grade pulps to dissolving-grade pulps. Doctoral Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
24. Krässig HA (1993) Cellulose: structure, accessibility, and reactivity. Polymer monographs, vol 11. Gordon and Breach Science, Yverdon, Switzerland; Philadelphia.
25. Kunze J, Fink H-P (2005) Structural changes and activation of cellulose by caustic soda solution with urea. Macromol Symp 223(1): 175-188. doi: 10. 1002/masy. 200550512.
26. Kvarnlöf N, Germgård U, Jönsson LJ, Söderlund C-A (2007) Optimization of the enzymatic activation of a dissolving pulp before viscose manufacture. Tappi J 6(6): 14-19.
27. Li Q, Gao Y, Wang H, Li B, Liu C, Yu G, Mu X (2012) Comparison of different alkali-based pretreatments of corn stover for improving enzymatic saccharification. Bioresour Technol 125: 193-199.
28. Lin Q (1965) Chemical fiber technology (chemical fiber technology). China financial and economic publishing house, Beijing, China.
29. Miao Q, Chen L, Huang L, Tian C, Zheng L, Ni Y (2014) A process for enhancing the accessibility and reactivity of hardwood kraft-based dissolving pulp for viscose rayon production by cellulase treatment. Bioresour Technol 154: 109-113.
30. Millett MA, Effland MJ, Caulfield DF (1979) Influence of fine grinding on the hydrolysis of cellulosic materials-acid vs. enzymatic. In: Ross D. Brown J, Jurasek L (eds) Hydrolysis of cellulose: mechanisms of enzymatic and acid catalysis, vol 181. pp 71-89.
31. Mou H, Li B, Heikkilä E, Iamazaki E, Zhan H, Fardim P (2013) Low consistency refining of eucalyptus pulp: effects on surface chemistry and interaction with FWAs. BioResources 8(4): 5995-6013.
32. Östberg L, Håkansson H, Germgård U (2012) Some aspects of the reactivity of pulp intended for high-viscosity viscose. BioResources 7(1): 743-755.
33. Peng H, Li H, Luo H, Xu J (2013) A novel combined pretreatment of ball milling and microwave irradiation for enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose. Bioresour Technol 130: 81-87. doi: 10. 1016/j. biortech. 2012. 10. 167.
34. Rajagopal S, Stepanik T, Free D, Hidasi G, Poggi T (1994) Enhancement of cellulose reactivity in viscose production using electron processing technology. Paper presented at the the Akzo Nobel sponsored conference on Challenges in Cellulosic Man-Made Fibres, Stockholm.
35. Roffael E (1988) Study on reactivity of differently prepared viscose pulps. Holzforschung 42(2): 135-136.
36. Schild G, Sixta H (2011) Sulfur-free dissolving pulps and their application for viscose and lyocell. Cellulose 18(4): 1113-1128. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-011-9532-0.
37. Schwanninger M, Rodrigues JC, Pereira H, Hinterstoisser B (2004) Effects of short-time vibratory ball milling on the shape of FT-IR spectra of wood and cellulose. Vib Spectrosc 36(1): 23-40. doi: 10. 1016/j. vibspec. 2004. 02. 003.
38. Sixta H (2006) Handbook of pulp, vol 2. Wiley, KGaA, Weinheim.
39. Sixta H, Harms H, Dapia S, Parajo JC, Puls J, Saake B, Fink H-P, Röder T (2004) Evaluation of new organosolv dissolving pulps. Part I: preparation, analytical characterization and viscose processability. Cellulose 11(1): 73-83.
40. Sixta H, Iakovlev M, Testova L, Roselli A, Hummel M, Borrega M, Heiningen A, Froschauer C, Schottenberger H (2013) Novel concepts of dissolving pulp production. Cellulose 20(4): 1547-1561. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-013-9943-1.
41. Strunk P (2012) Characterization of cellulose pulps and the influence of their properties on the process and production of viscose and cellulose ethers. Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
42. Sun Y, Cheng J (2002) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol 83: 1-11.
43. Tian C, Zheng L, Miao Q, Nash C, Cao C, Ni Y (2013) Improvement in the Fock test for determining the reactivity of dissolving pulp. Tappi J 12(11): 19-24.
44. Xu M, Xu M, Dai H, Wang S, Wu W (2013) The effects of ball milling and PFI pretreatment on the cellulose structure and fibermorphology. J Cell Sci Technol 21(2): 46-52.
45. Zhao H, Kwak JH, Wang Y, Franz JA, White JM, Holladay JE (2006) Effects of crystallinity on dilute acid hydrolysis of cellulose by cellulose ball-milling study. Energy Fuels 20: 807-811.