Perioperative surgical complications and learning curve associated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A single-institute experience

CiOS Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 91-96

  Park, Yung ^a   Lee, Soo Bin ^a   Seok, Sang Ok ^a   Jo, Byung Woo ^a   Ha, Joong Won ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Complications; Learning curve; Lumbar vertebrae; Minimally invasive; Spine fusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; GRAFT DYSFUNCTION; HUMAN; LEARNING CURVE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEURALGIA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEDICLE SCREW; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REOPERATION; SPINE FUSION; SURGEON; TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY; WOUND INFECTION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINAL DISEASES; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING CURVE; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84922637024     PISSN: 2005291X     EISSN: 20054408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4055/cios.2015.7.1.91     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9(6):560-5.
2. Peng CW, Yue WM, Poh SY, Yeo W, Tan SB. Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(13):1385-9.
3. Scheufler KM, Dohmen H, Vougioukas VI. Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(4 Suppl 2):203-12.
4. Schizas C, Tzinieris N, Tsiridis E, Kosmopoulos V. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop. 2009;33(6): 1683-8.
5. Shunwu F, Xing Z, Fengdong Z, Xiangqian F. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(17):1615-20.
6. Lau D, Lee JG, Han SJ, Lu DC, Chou D. Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18(5):624-7.
7. Lee JC, Jang HD, Shin BJ. Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(18):1548-57.
8. Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J. Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(4):623-8.
9. Schizas C, Michel J, Kosmopoulos V, Theumann N. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw insertion in percutaneous posterior transpedicular stabilization. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(5):613-7.
10. Aoki Y, Yamagata M, Nakajima F, et al. Examining risk factors for posterior migration of fusion cages following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a possible limitation of unilateral pedicle screw fixation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010; 13(3):381-7.