Behavioural effects of imprinted genes

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue , 2015, Pages 28-33

  Davies, Jennifer R ^a   Dent, Claire L ^a,b   McNamara, Gráinne I ^a   Isles, Anthony R ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR BOUND PROTEIN 10; SOMATOMEDIN C;

BEHAVIOR GENETICS; CHROMOSOME 15; DEVELOPMENTAL GENE; FETAL MALNUTRITION; GENE CLUSTER; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOME IMPRINTING; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; GRB10 GENE; HAPPY PUPPET SYNDROME; HUMAN; IGF2 GENE; MATERNAL NUTRITION; NONHUMAN; NUTRIENT SUPPLY; PRADER WILLI SYNDROME; REVIEW; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SUCKLING ANIMAL;

EID: 84922623925     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23521546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.07.008     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Wood A.J., Oakey R.J. Genomic imprinting in mammals: emerging themes and established theories. PLoS Genet 2006, 2:e147.
2. Abramowitz L.K., Bartolomei M.S. Genomic imprinting: recognition and marking of imprinted loci. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2012, 22:72-78.
3. Ferguson-Smith A.C. Genomic imprinting: the emergence of an epigenetic paradigm. Nat Rev Genet 2011, 12:565-575.
4. Tunster S.J., Jensen A.B., John R.M. Imprinted genes in mouse placental development and the regulation of fetal energy stores. Reproduction 2013, 145:R117-R137.
5. Smith F.M., Garfield A.S., Ward A. Regulation of growth and metabolism by imprinted genes. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006, 113:279-291.
6. Wilkinson L.S., Davies W., Isles A.R. Genomic imprinting effects on brain development and function. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007, 8:832-843.
7. Huang H.S., Allen J.A., Mabb A.M., King I.F., Miriyala J., Taylor-Blake B., Sciaky N., Dutton J.W., Lee H.M., Chen X., et al. Topoisomerase inhibitors unsilence the dormant allele of Ube3a in neurons. Nature 2012, 481:185-189.
8. McNamara G.I., Isles A.R. Dosage-sensitivity of imprinted genes expressed in the brain: 15q11-q13 and neuropsychiatric illness. Biochem Soc Trans 2013, 41:721-726.
9. Bieth E., Eddiry S., Gaston V., Lorenzini F., Buffet A., Conte Auriol F., Molinas C., Cailley D., Rooryck C., Arveiler B., et al. Highly restricted deletion of the SNORD116 region is implicated in Prader-Willi Syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet 2014, 10.1038/ejhg.2014.103.
10. de Smith A.J., Purmann C., Walters R.G., Ellis R.J., Holder S.E., Van Haelst M.M., Brady A.F., Fairbrother U.L., Dattani M., Keogh J.M., et al. A deletion of the HBII-85 class of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) is associated with hyperphagia, obesity and hypogonadism. Hum Mol Genet 2009, 18:3257-3265.
11. Duker A.L., Ballif B.C., Bawle E.V., Person R.E., Mahadevan S., Alliman S., Thompson R., Traylor R., Bejjani B.A., Shaffer L.G., et al. Paternally inherited microdeletion at 15q11.2 confirms a significant role for the SNORD116 C/D box snoRNA cluster in Prader-Willi syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet 2010, 18:1196-1201.
12. Sahoo T., del Gaudio D., German J.R., Shinawi M., Peters S.U., Person R.E., Garnica A., Cheung S.W., Beaudet A.L. Prader-Willi phenotype caused by paternal deficiency for the HBII-85 C/D box small nucleolar RNA cluster. Nat Genet 2008, 40:719-721.
13. Ding F., Li H.H., Zhang S., Solomon N.M., Camper S.A., Cohen P., Francke U. SnoRNA Snord116 (Pwcr1/MBII-85) deletion causes growth deficiency and hyperphagia in mice. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e1709.
14. Skryabin B.V., Gubar L.V., Seeger B., Pfeiffer J., Handel S., Robeck T., Karpova E., Rozhdestvensky T.S., Brosius J. Deletion of the MBII-85 snoRNA gene cluster in mice results in postnatal growth retardation. PLoS Genet 2007, 3:e235.
15. Yin Q.F., Yang L., Zhang Y., Xiang J.F., Wu Y.W., Carmichael G.G., Chen L.L. Long noncoding RNAs with snoRNA ends. Mol Cell 2012, 48:219-230.
16. Stelzer Y., Sagi I., Yanuka O., Eiges R., Benvenisty N. The noncoding RNA IPW regulates the imprinted DLK1-DIO3 locus in an induced pluripotent stem cell model of Prader-Willi syndrome. Nat Genet 2014, 46:551-557.
17. Powell W.T., Coulson R.L., Gonzales M.L., Crary F.K., Wong S.S., Adams S., Ach R.A., Tsang P., Yamada N.A., Yasui D.H., et al. R-loop formation at Snord116 mediates topotecan inhibition of Ube3a-antisense and allele-specific chromatin decondensation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:13938-13943.
18. Schaaf C.P., Gonzalez-Garay M.L., Xia F., Potocki L., Gripp K.W., Zhang B., Peters B.A., McElwain M.A., Drmanac R., Beaudet A.L., et al. Truncating mutations of MAGEL2 cause Prader-Willi phenotypes and autism. Nat Genet 2013, 45:1405-1408.
19. Buiting K., Di Donato N., Beygo J., Bens S., von der Hagen M., Hackmann K., Horsthemke B. Clinical phenotypes of MAGEL2 mutations and deletions. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2014, 9:40.
20. Kozlov S.V., Bogenpohl J.W., Howell M.P., Wevrick R., Panda S., Hogenesch J.B., Muglia L.J., Van Gelder R.N., Herzog E.D., Stewart C.L. The imprinted gene Magel2 regulates normal circadian output. Nat Genet 2007, 39:1266-1272.
21. Schaller F., Watrin F., Sturny R., Massacrier A., Szepetowski P., Muscatelli F. A single postnatal injection of oxytocin rescues the lethal feeding behaviour in mouse newborns deficient for the imprinted Magel2 gene. Hum Mol Genet 2010, 19:4895-4905.
22. Garfield A.S., Cowley M., Smith F.M., Moorwood K., Stewart-Cox J.E., Gilroy K., Baker S., Xia J., Dalley J.W., Hurst L.D., et al. Distinct physiological and behavioural functions for parental alleles of imprinted Grb10. Nature 2011, 469:534-538.
23. Sarna J.R., Dyck R.H., Whishaw I.Q. The Dalila effect: C57BL6 mice barber whiskers by plucking. Behav Brain Res 2000, 108:39-45.
24. Arnaud P., Monk D., Hitchins M., Gordon E., Dean W., Beechey C.V., Peters J., Craigen W., Preece M., Stanier P., et al. Conserved methylation imprints in the human and mouse GRB10 genes with divergent allelic expression suggests differential reading of the same mark. Hum Mol Genet 2003, 12:1005-1019.
25. Charalambous M., Cowley M., Geoghegan F., Smith F.M., Radford E.J., Marlow B.P., Graham C.F., Hurst L.D., Ward A. Maternally-inherited Grb10 reduces placental size and efficiency. Dev Biol 2010, 337:1-8.
26. Holt L.J., Lyons R.J., Ryan A.S., Beale S.M., Ward A., Cooney G.J., Daly R.J. Dual ablation of Grb10 and Grb14 in mice reveals their combined role in regulation of insulin signaling and glucose homeostasis. Mol Endocrinol 2009, 23:1406-1414.
27. Cowley M., Garfield A.S., Madon-Simon M., Charalambous M., Clarkson R.W., Smalley M.J., Kendrick H., Isles A.R., Parry A.J., Carney S., et al. Developmental programming mediated by complementary roles of imprinted Grb10 in mother and pup. PLoS Biol 2014, 12:e1001799.
28. Wilkins J.F. Genomic imprinting of Grb10: coadaptation or conflict?. PLoS Biol 2014, 12:e1001800.
29. Constancia M., Angiolini E., Sandovici I., Smith P., Smith R., Kelsey G., Dean W., Ferguson-Smith A., Sibley C.P., Reik W., et al. Adaptation of nutrient supply to fetal demand in the mouse involves interaction between the Igf2 gene and placental transporter systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:19219-19224.
30. Mikaelsson M.A., Constancia M., Dent C.L., Wilkinson L.S., Humby T. Placental programming of anxiety in adulthood revealed by Igf2-null models. Nat Commun 2013, 4:2311.
31. Champagne F.A., Curley J.P. How social experiences influence the brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2005, 15:704-709.
32. Ivanova E., Chen J.H., Segonds-Pichon A., Ozanne S.E., Kelsey G. DNA methylation at differentially methylated regions of imprinted genes is resistant to developmental programming by maternal nutrition. Epigenetics 2012, 7:1200-1210.
33. Radford E.J., Isganaitis E., Jimenez-Chillaron J., Schroeder J., Molla M., Andrews S., Didier N., Charalambous M., McEwen K., Marazzi G., et al. An unbiased assessment of the role of imprinted genes in an intergenerational model of developmental programming. PLoS Genet 2012, 8:e1002605.
34. Matsuoka S., Edwards M.C., Bai C., Parker S., Zhang P., Baldini A., Harper J.W., Elledge S.J. p57KIP2, a structurally distinct member of the p21CIP1 Cdk inhibitor family, is a candidate tumor suppressor gene. Genes Dev 1995, 9:650-662.
35. Westbury J., Watkins M., Ferguson-Smith A.C., Smith J. Dynamic temporal and spatial regulation of the cdk inhibitor p57(kip2) during embryo morphogenesis. Mech Dev 2001, 109:83-89.
36. Itoh Y., Masuyama N., Nakayama K., Nakayama K.I., Gotoh Y. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p57 and p27 regulate neuronal migration in the developing mouse neocortex. J Biol Chem 2007, 282:390-396.
37. Ye W., Mairet-Coello G., Pasoreck E., Dicicco-Bloom E. Patterns of p57Kip2 expression in embryonic rat brain suggest roles in progenitor cell cycle exit and neuronal differentiation. Dev Neurobiol 2009, 69:1-21.
38. Dyer M.A., Cepko C.L. p57(Kip2) regulates progenitor cell proliferation and amacrine interneuron development in the mouse retina. Development 2000, 127:3593-3605.
39. Colasante G., Simonet J.C., Calogero R., Crispi S., Sessa A., Cho G., Golden J.A., Broccoli V. ARX regulates cortical intermediate progenitor cell expansion and upper layer neuron formation through repression of Cdkn1c. Cereb Cortex 2013.
40. Tury A., Mairet-Coello G., DiCicco-Bloom E. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p57Kip2 regulates cell cycle exit, differentiation, and migration of embryonic cerebral cortical precursors. Cereb Cortex 2011, 21:1840-1856.
41. Furutachi S., Matsumoto A., Nakayama K.I., Gotoh Y. p57 controls adult neural stem cell quiescence and modulates the pace of lifelong neurogenesis. EMBO J 2013, 32:970-981.
42. Joseph B., Wallen-Mackenzie A., Benoit G., Murata T., Joodmardi E., Okret S., Perlmann T. p57(Kip2) cooperates with Nurr1 in developing dopamine cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:15619-15624.
43. Zhang P., Liegeois N.J., Wong C., Finegold M., Hou H., Thompson J.C., Silverman A., Harper J.W., DePinho R.A., Elledge S.J. Altered cell differentiation and proliferation in mice lacking p57KIP2 indicates a role in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Nature 1997, 387:151-158.
44. Drake A.J., Liu L., Kerrigan D., Meehan R.R., Seckl J.R. Multigenerational programming in the glucocorticoid programmed rat is associated with generation-specific and parent of origin effects. Epigenetics 2011, 6:1334-1343.
45. Pena C.J., Neugut Y.D., Calarco C.A., Champagne F.A. Effects of maternal care on the development of midbrain dopamine pathways and reward-directed behavior in female offspring. Eur J Neurosci 2014, 39:946-956.
46. Vucetic Z., Totoki K., Schoch H., Whitaker K.W., Hill-Smith T., Lucki I., Reyes T.M. Early life protein restriction alters dopamine circuitry. Neuroscience 2010, 168:359-370.
47. Isles A.R., Holland A.J. Imprinted genes and mother-offspring interactions. Early Hum Dev 2005, 81:73-77.
48. Isles A.R. Genomic imprinting: the cost of mother's care. Bioessays 2011, 33:924-926.
49. Lassi G., Ball S.T., Maggi S., Colonna G., Nieus T., Cero C., Bartolomucci A., Peters J., Tucci V. Loss of Gnas imprinting differentially affects REM/NREM sleep and cognition in mice. PLoS Genet 2012, 8:e1002706.