Is american college of surgeons NSQIP organ space infection a surrogate for pancreatic fistula?

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 219, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1111-1116

  Parikh, Janak Atul ^a   Beane, Joal D ^a   Kilbane, E Molly ^b   Milgrom, Daniel P ^a   Pitt, Henry A ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH   (United States)

^c TEMPLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; BACTERIAL PERITONITIS; BILE LEAKAGE; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFECTION; INTESTINE ISCHEMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; ORGAN SPACE INFECTION; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACTUAL DATABASE; GENERAL SURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PANCREAS RESECTION; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC FISTULA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARDS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; INFECTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC FISTULA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84922552040     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: 18791190     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.08.006     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Pitt HA, Kilbane M, Strasburg SM, et al. ACS NSQIP has the potential to create an HPB NSQIP option. HPB 2009; 11: 405-413
2. Parikh P, Shiloach M, Cohen ME, et al. Pancreatectomy risk calculator: An ACS NSQIP resource. HPB 2010; 12: 465-471
3. Ball CG, Pitt HA, Kilbane M, et al. Perioperative blood transfusions and operative time are quality indicators for pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB 2010; 12: 465-467
4. Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J, et al. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: The Patient Safety in Surgery Study. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 329-336
5. Hall BL, Hamilton BH, Richards K, et al. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: An evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 363-376
6. Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, Ko CY. Quality improvement in surgery: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg 2010; 44: 251-267
7. Guillamondegui OD, Gunter OL, Hines L, et al. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to improve surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 214: 709-714
8. Daley J, Khuri SF, Henderson W, et al. Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: Results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. JAmColl Surg 1997; 185: 328-340
9. Fink AS, Campbell DA, Mentzer M, et al. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-Veterans Administration hospitals: Initial demonstration of feasibility. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 344-453
10. Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daly J, et al. The Patient Safety in Surgery Study: Background, study design, and patient populations. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 1089-1102
11. Khuri SF. The NSQIP: A new frontier in surgery. Surgery 2005; 138: 837-843
12. Khan MA, Grinberg R, Johnson S, et al. Perioperative risk factors for 30-day mortality after bariatric surgery: Is functional status important? Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 1772-1777
13. Madenci AL, Ozaki CK, Belkin M, McPhee JT. Carotid-subclavian bypass and subclavian-carotid transposition in the thoracic endovascular aortic repair era. J Vasc Surg 2013; 57: 1275-1282
14. Cima R, Dankbar E, Lovely J, et al. Colorectal surgery surgical site infection reduction program: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-driven multidisciplinary singleinstitution experience. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216: 23-33
15. Glarner CE, Greenblatt DY, Rettammel RJ, et al. Wound complications after inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma: Is ACS NSQIP adequate? Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 2049-2055
16. Eck DL, Kooce SL, Goldberg RF, et al. Breast surgery outcomes as quality measures according to the NSQIP database. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 3212-3217
17. Rickels AS, Iannuzzi JC, Kelly KN, et al. Anastomotic leak or organ space surgical site infection: What are we missing in our quality improvement programs? Surgery 2013; 154: 680-687
18. Epelboym I, Gawlas I, Lee JA, et al. Limitations of ACS NSQIP in reporting complications for patients undergoing pancreatectomy: Underscoring the need for a pancreasspecific module. World J Surg 2014; 38: 1461-1467
19. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: Pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 2010; 148: 702-709
20. Ziegler KM, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, et al. Pancreatic surgery: Evolution at a high-volume center. Surgery 2010; 148: 702-709
21. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138: 8-13
22. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, et al. One hundred and fortyfive consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 1993; 217: 430-435
23. Ahmad SA, Edwards MJ, Sutton JM, et al. Factors influencing readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A multiinstitutional study of 1302 patients. Ann Surg 2012; 256: 529-537
24. Vin Y, Sima CS, Getrajdman GI, et al. Management and outcomes of postpancreatectomy fistula, leak, and abscess: Results of 908 patients resected at a single institution between 2000 and 2005. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 207: 490e498
25. Lillemoe KD, Kaushal S, Cameron JL, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: Indications and outcomes in 235 patients. Ann Surg 1999; 229: 693-698
26. Fahy BN, Frey CF, Ho HS, et al. Morbidity, morality and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 2002; 183: 237-241
27. Beane JD, Pitt HA, Nakeeb A, et al. Splenic preserving distal pancreatectomy: Does vessel preservation matter? J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212: 651-657
28. DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 931-939.