Using secondary analysis of qualitative data of patient experiences of health care to inform health services research and policy

Journal of Health Services Research and Policy

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 177-182

  Ziebland, Sue ^a   Hunt, Kate ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health policy; Qualitative interviews; Secondary analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CONSULTATION; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT CARE; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; SOCIAL CARE; TERMINAL CARE; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 84922474976     PISSN: 13558196     EISSN: 17581060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1355819614524187     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ziebland S. Narrative interviewing. In: Ziebland S, Coulter A, Calabrese J and Locock L (eds) Understanding and using health experiences: improving patient care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp.38–48.
2. Heaton J. Reworking qualitative data. London: Sage, 2004.
3. Mays N, Pope C and Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005; 10(Suppl 1): 6–20.
4. Petticrew M and Roberts H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences. A practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2006.
5. Pope C, Mays N and Popay J. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative health research a guide to methods. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2007.
6. Bishop L. Ethical sharing and reuse of qualitative data. Aust J Soc Issues 2009; 44(3): 255–272.
7. Wellcome Trust. Policy on data management and sharing, http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Policyand-position-statements/WTX035043.htm (2010, accessed 18 February 2014).
8. Medical Research Council. MRC policy on sharing of research data from population and patient studies, http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Ourresearch/Ethicsresearchguidance/datasharing/Policy/PHSPolicy/index.htm(2011, accessed 18 February 2014).
9. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding. Paris: OECD Publications, 2007.
10. NIH. NIH data sharing policy and implementation guidance, http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/data_sharing_guidance.htm?print¼yes& 2003, accessed 18 February 2014.
11. Walport M and Brest P. Sharing research data to improve public health. Lancet 2011; 377(9765): 537–539.
12. Hinds PS, Vogel RJ and Clarke-Steffen L. The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qual Health Res 1997; 7: 408–424.
13. Heaton J. Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Social Research Update University of Surrey. 1998; 22 (Autumn).
14. Parry O and Mauthner NS. Whose data are they anyway? Practical, legal and ethical issues in archiving qualitative research data. Sociology 2004; 38: 139–152.
15. Parry O and Mauthner NS. Back to basics: who re-uses qualitative data and why? Sociology 2005; 39: 337–342.
16. Hammersley M. Can we re-use qualitative data via secondary analysis? Notes on some terminological and substantive issues. Sociol Res Online 2009; 15(1): 5.
17. Mason J. ‘Re-using’ qualitative data: on the merits of an investigative epistemology. Sociol Res Online 2007; 12(3): 3.
18. Bishop L. Protecting respondents and enabling data sharing: reply to Parry and Mauthner. Sociology 2005; 39: 333–336.
19. Fielding NG and Fielding JL. Resistance and adaptation to criminal identity: using secondary analysis to evaluate classic studies of crime and deviance. Sociology 2000; 34: 671–689.
20. Moore N. (Re)using qualitative data. Sociol Res Online 2007; 12(3): 1.
21. Bishop L. A reflexive account of reusing qualitative data: beyond primary/secondary dualism. Sociol Res Online 2007; 12(3).
22. Irwin S and Winterton M. Qualitative secondary analysis and social explanation. Sociol Res Online 2012; 17(2): 4.
23. General Medical Council. The development of treatment and care towards the end of life: good practice in decision making, http://www.gmc-uk.org/Story_of_the_EoL_guidance2.pdf_32510823.pdf (2010, accessed 18 February 2014).
24. Bate S and Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15: 307–310.
25. Locock L, Robert G, Boaz A, et al. Using a national archive of patient experience narratives to promote local patient-centred quality improvement: an ethnographic process evaluation of ‘accelerated’ experiencebased co-design. J Health Serv Res & Pol. In press.
26. Hunt K, France E, Wyke S, et al. My brain couldn’t move from planning a birth to planning a funeral: a qualitative study of parents’ experiences of decisions after ending a pregnancy for fetal abnormality. Int J Nurs Studies 2009; 46: 1111–1121.
27. Hall S, Gray N, Browne S, et al. A qualitative exploration of the role of primary care in supporting colorectal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2012; 20: 3071–3078.
28. Charteris-Black J and Seale C. Men and emotion talk: evidence from the experience of illness. Gender and Language 2009; 3(1): 81–113.
29. Hilton S, Hunt K, Emslie C, et al. Have men been overlooked? A comparison of young men and women’s experiences of chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Psycho-Oncolocy 2008; 17: 577–583.
30. Ziebland S and Kokanovic R. Emotions and chronic illness. Chronic Illn 2012; 8(3): 159–162.