Comparison and limitations of DVH-based NTCP models derived from 3D-CRT and IMRT data for prediction of gastrointestinal toxicities in prostate cancer patients by using propensity score matched pair analysis

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 435-443

  Troeller, Almut ^a,b   Yan, Di ^a   Marina, Ovidiu ^a   Schulze, Derek ^a   Alber, Markus ^c   Parodi, Katia ^b   Belka, Claus ^b   Söhn, Matthias ^b  

^a WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSICAL THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; TOXICITY; UROLOGY;

ADAPTIVE RADIATION THERAPIES; COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITERIA; CONFORMAL RADIATION THERAPY; DOSE-VOLUME HISTOGRAMS; EQUIVALENT UNIFORM DOSE; GASTROINTESTINAL TOXICITIES; METHODS AND MATERIALS; NORMAL-TISSUE COMPLICATION PROBABILITY MODELS;

PATIENT TREATMENT;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADAPTIVE RADIATION; ANUS FISSURE; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIARRHEA; FISTULA; GASTROINTESTINAL TOXICITY; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NORMAL TISSUE COMPLICATION PROBABILITY; PAIN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROCTITIS; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROSTATE CANCER; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTION; RECTUM DISEASE; RECTUM HEMORRHAGE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIATION THERAPY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMORBIDITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOTHERAPY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; GERMANY; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIATION INJURIES; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CAUSALITY; COMORBIDITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; GERMANY; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIATION INJURIES; RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOTHERAPY, CONFORMAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84922458295     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: 1879355X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.046     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Lyman JT. Complication probability as assessed from dose-volume histograms. Radiat Res Suppl 1985;8:S13-19.
2. Burman C, Kutcher GJ, Emami B, et al. Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;21:123-135.
3. Alber M, Belka C. A normal tissue dose response model of dynamic repair processes. Phys Med Biol 2006;51:153-172.
4. Marks LB, Yorke ED, Jackson A, et al. Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:S10-19.
5. Michalski JM, Gay H, Jackson A, et al. Radiation dose-volume effects in radiation-induced rectal injury. Int J Radiat Oncol 2010;76:S123-S129.
6. Luxton G, Hancock SL, Boyer AL. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;59:267-284.
7. Hardcastle N, Davies A, Foo K, et al. Rectal dose reduction with IMRT for prostate radiotherapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2010;54:235-248.
8. Budäus L, Bolla M, Bossi A, et al. Functional outcomes and complications following radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2012;61:112-127.
9. Valdagni R, Vavassori V, Rancati T, et al. Increasing the risk of late rectal bleeding after high-dose radiotherapy for prostate cancer: The case of previous abdominal surgery. Results from a prospective trial. Radiother Oncol 2012;103:252-255.
10. Yan D, Lockman D, Brabbins D, et al. An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;48:289-302.
11. Vargas C, Yan D, Kestin LL, et al. Phase II dose escalation study of image-guided adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: use of dosevolume constraints to achieve rectal isotoxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;63:141-149.
12. Sekhon JS. Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: the matching package for R. Journal of Statistical Software 2011;42(7):1-52.
13. Kutcher GJ, Burman C. Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: The effective volume method. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989;16:1623-1630.
14. Söhn M, Yan D, Liang J, et al. Incidence of late rectal bleeding in high-dose conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer using equivalent uniform dose-based and dose-volume-based normal tissue complication probability models. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;67:1066-1073.
15. Niemierko A. A generalized concept of equivalent uniform dose. Med Phys 1999;26(6):1100.
16. Cox DR. Analysis of Binary Data. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1989.
17. Collett D. Modelling Binary Data. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2003.
18. Jackson A, Ten Haken RK, Robertson JM, et al. Analysis of clinical complication data for radiation hepatitis using a parallel architecture model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;31:883-891.
19. Hosmer DW, Lemesbow S. Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model. Commun Stat Theory Methods 1980;9:1043-1069.
20. Kumar RJ, Barqawi A, Crawford ED. Adverse events associated with hormonal therapy for prostate cancer. Rev Urol 2005;7(suppl 5):S37-43.
21. Fellin G, Rancati T, Fiorino C, et al. Long term rectal function after high-dose prostatecancer radiotherapy: Results from a prospective cohort study. Radiother Oncol 2013.
22. Schulze D, Liang J, Yan D, et al. Comparison of various online IGRT strategies: The benefits of online treatment plan re-optimization. Radiother. Oncol. J. Eur. Soc. Ther. Radiol. Oncol. 2009;90:367-376.
23. Guckenberger M, Meyer J, Vordermark D, et al. Magnitude and clinical relevance of translational and rotational patient setup errors: A cone-beam CT study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;65:934-942.
24. Thor M, Apte A, Deasy JO, et al. Statistical simulations to estimate motion-inclusive dose-volume histograms for prediction of rectal morbidity following radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 2013;52:666-675.
25. Mohammed N, Kestin L, Ghilezan M, et al. Comparison of acute and late toxicities for three modern high-dose radiation treatment techniques for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;82:204-212.
26. Peeters STH, Lebesque JV, Heemsbergen WD, et al. Localized volume effects for late rectal and anal toxicity after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;64:1151-1161.
27. Munbodh R, Jackson A, Bauer J, et al. Dosimetric and anatomic indicators of late rectal toxicity after high-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Med Phys 2008;35:2137-2150.
28. Acosta O, Drean G, Ospina JD, et al. Voxel-based population analysis for correlating local dose and rectal toxicity in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2013;58:2581-2595.
29. Buettner F, Gulliford SL, Webb S, et al. Assessing correlations between the spatial distribution of the dose to the rectal wall and late rectal toxicity after prostate radiotherapy: An analysis of data from the MRC RT01 trial (ISRCTN 47772397). Phys Med Biol 2009;54:6535-6548.
30. Söhn M, Alber M, Yan D. Principal component analysis-based pattern analysis of dose-volume histograms and influence on rectal toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;69:230-239.
31. Rancati T, Fiorino C, Gagliardi G, et al. Fitting late rectal bleeding data using different NTCP models: Results from an Italian multicentric study (AIROPROS0101). Radiother Oncol 2004;73:21-32.
32. Gulliford SL, Partridge M, Sydes MR, et al. Parameters for the Lyman Kutcher Burman (LKB) model of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for specific rectal complications observed in clinical practise. Radiother Oncol 2012;102:347-351.
33. Peeters STH, Hoogeman MS, Heemsbergen WD, et al. Rectal bleeding, fecal incontinence, and high stool frequency after conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Normal tissue complication probability modeling. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;66:11-19.
34. Fiorino C, Valdagni R, Rancati T, et al. Dose-volume effects for normal tissues in external radiotherapy: Pelvis. Radiother Oncol 2009;93:153-167.
35. Tucker SL, Cheung R, Dong L, et al. Dose-volume response analyses of late rectal bleeding after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;59:353-365.
36. Jackson A, Skwarchuk MW, Zelefsky MJ, et al. Late rectal bleeding after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. II. Volume effects and dose-volume histograms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;49:685-698.
37. Troeller A, Soehn M, Yan D. Comparison of Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) Model Outcomes for Conformal Radiation Therapy (CRT) Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) of Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol 2012;84. S77.