|
Volumn 313, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 469-470
|
Measuring surgical outcomes for improvement: Was Codman wrong?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
DATA ANALYSIS;
EDITORIAL;
HIGH RISK PATIENT;
HUMAN;
MEDICAL LITERATURE;
MEDICAL SOCIETY;
ORGANIZATIONAL DOWNSIZING;
ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCY;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PATIENT ASSESSMENT;
PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE;
PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
RISK FACTOR;
SURGICAL MORTALITY;
SURGICAL RISK;
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;
ECONOMICS;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HOSPITAL;
HOSPITAL READMISSION;
MALE;
MEDICARE;
MORTALITY;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
PROCEDURES;
STANDARDS;
STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;
SURGERY;
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;
ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS;
FEMALE;
HEALTH EXPENDITURES;
HOSPITALS;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MEDICARE;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
PATIENT READMISSION;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;
|
EID: 84922455682
PISSN: 00987484
EISSN: 15383598
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.4 Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (52)
|
References (7)
|