Influence of ion interaction on lead removal by a polyamide nanofiltration membrane

Desalination

Volumn 362, Issue , 2015, Pages 84-92

  Mehdipour, Saber ^a   Vatanpour, Vahid ^b,c   Kariminia, Hamid Reza ^a  

^a SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b KHARAZMI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c NATIONAL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cation interaction; Heavy metals; Lead removal; Nanofiltration; Zeta potential

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL CONTAMINATION; HEAVY METALS; HIGH PRESSURE EFFECTS; IONS; LEAD; LEAD REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; NEGATIVE IONS; POSITIVE IONS; ZETA POTENTIAL; ZINC;

CATION INTERACTIONS; INITIAL FEED CONCENTRATION; MONOVALENT CATIONS; OPERATING PRESSURE; POLYAMIDE NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; SINGLE-SALT SOLUTIONS; SUBSTANTIAL REDUCTION; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES;

CADMIUM COMPOUNDS;

CATION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FILTRATION; HEAVY METAL; LEAD; MEMBRANE; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 84922432289     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.01.030     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. González-Muñoz M.J., Rodríguez M.A., Luque S., Álvarez J.R. Recovery of heavy metals from metal industry wastewaters by chemical precipitation and nanofiltration. Desalination 2006, 200:742-744.
2. Babel S., Kurniawan T.A. Cr(VI) removal from synthetic wastewater using coconut shell charcoal and commercial activated carbon modified with oxidizing agents and/or chitosan. Chemosphere 2004, 54:951-967.
3. Prakash S., Kumar M., Tripathi B.P., Shahi V.K. Sol-gel derived poly(vinyl alcohol)-3-(2-aminoethylamino) propyl trimethoxysilane: cross-linked organic-inorganic hybrid beads for the removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 162:28-36.
4. Matlock M.M., Howerton B.S., Atwood D.A. Chemical precipitation of heavy metals from acid mine drainage. Water Res. 2002, 36:4757-4764.
5. Ku Y., Jung I. Photocatalytic reduction of Cr (VI) in aqueous solutions by UV irradiation with the presence of titanium dioxide. Water Res. 2001, 35:135-142.
6. Huisman J.L., Schouten G., Schultz C. Biologically produced sulphide for purification of process streams, effluent treatment and recovery of metals in the metal and mining industry. Hydrometallurgy 2006, 83:106-113.
7. 2+ adsorption from aqueous solutions by pyrite and synthetic iron sulphide. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 137:626-632.
8. Lee J.H., Nam S.J. Equilibrium in the extraction of Pb(II) by D2EHPA and dithizone. Hwahak Konghak 1990, 28:264-270.
9. 2+ ions from aqueous solution by Lewatit CNP 80. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 140:299-307.
10. 3+ by IRN-77 cation exchange resin in synthesized wastewater. Chemosphere 2004, 56:141-147.
11. Alyüz B., Veli S. Kinetics and equilibrium studies for the removal of nickel and zinc from aqueous solutions by ion exchange resins. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 167:482-488.
12. Susan E.B., Trudy J.O., Mark B., Dean A.D. A review of potentially low-cost sorbent for heavy metals. Water Res. 1999, 33:2469-2479.
13. Serrano V.G., Garcia A.M., Mansilla A.E., Calahorro C.V. Adsorption of mercury, cadmium and lead from aqueous solution on heat-treated and sulphurized activated carbon. Water Res. 1998, 32:1-4.
14. Ghaedi M., Ahmadi F., Shokrollahi A. Simultaneous preconcentration and determination of copper, nickel, cobalt and lead ions content by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 142:272-278.
15. Dong D., Liu L., Hua X., Lu Y. Comparison of lead, cadmium, copper and cobalt adsorption onto metal oxides and organic materials in natural surface coatings. Microchem. J. 2007, 85:270-275.
16. Eccles H. Treatment of metal-contaminated wastes: why select a biological process?. Trends Biotechnol. 1999, 17:462-465.
17. Muñoz M.J.G., Rodriguez M.A., Luque S., Alvarez J.R. Recovery of heavy metals from metal industry wastewaters by chemical precipitation and nanofiltration. Desalination 2006, 200:742-744.
18. Ritchie S.M.C., Bhattacharyya D. Membrane-based hybrid processes for high water recovery and selective inorganic pollutant separation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2002, 92:21-32.
19. Bouranenea S., Fievet P., Szymczykb A., Samarc M.E., Vidonnea A. Influence of operating conditions on the rejection of cobalt and lead ions in aqueous solutions by a nanofiltration polyamide membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:150-157.
20. Gherasim C., Cuhorka J., Mikulasek P. Analysis of lead(II) retention from single salt and binary aqueous solutions by a polyamide nanofiltration membrane: experimental results and modelling. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 436:132-144.
21. Linde K., Jonsson A.S. Nanofiltration of salt solutions and landfill leachate. Desalination 1995, 103:223-232.
22. Amy G.L., Alleman B.C., Cluff C.B. Removal of dissolved organic matter by nanofiltration. J. Environ. Eng. 1990, 116:200-205.
23. Starthmann H. Membrane separation processes. J. Membr. Sci. 1981, 9:121-189.
24. Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 119:253-268.
25. Xu Y.Z., Lebrun R.E. Investigation of the solute separation by charged nanofiltration membrane: effect of pH, ionic strength and solute type. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 158:93-104.
26. Gherasim C.V., Mikulášek P. Influence of operating variables on the removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions by nanofiltration. Desalination 2014, 343:67-74.
27. Saikaew W., Mattaraj S., Jiraratananon R. Nanofiltration performance of lead solutions: effects of solution pH and ionic strength. WSTWS 2010, 10:193-200.
28. Schaep J., Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C., Wilms D. Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 1998, 14:155-162.
29. Smoluchowski M. Handbook of Electricity and Magnetism 1921, vol. 2:366. Barth, Leipzig.
30. Abramson H.A. Electrokinetic phenomena and their application to biology and medicine. J. Phys. Chem. 1934, 38(8):1128-1129.
31. Jacobasch H.J., Schurz J. Characterization of polymer surfaces by means of electrokinetic measurements. Progr. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1988, 77:40-48.
32. Fairbrother F., Mastin H. Studies in electroendosmosis. J. Chem. Soc. 1924, 125:2319-2330.
33. Walker Sh.L., Bhattacharjee S., Hoek E.M.V., Elimelech M. A novel asymmetric clamping cell for measuring streaming potential of flat surfaces. Langmuir 2002, 18:2193-2198.
34. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W. Diafiltration by nanofiltration: prediction and optimization. J. AIChE 1998, 44:1799-1812.
35. Teixeira M.R., Rosa M.J., Nystrom M. The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 265:160-166.
36. Al-Rashdi B.A.M., Johnson D.J., Hilal N. Removal of heavy metal ions by nanofiltration. Desalination 2013, 315:2-17.
37. Pérez-Sicairos S., Lin S.W., Félix-Navarro R.M., Espinoza-Gómez H. Rejection of As(III) and As(V) from arsenic contaminated water via electro-cross flow negatively charged nanofiltration membrane system. Desalination 2009, 249:458-465.
38. Krieg H.M., Modise S.J., Keizer K., Neomagus H.W.J.P. Salt rejection in nanofiltration for single and binary salt mixtures in view of sulphate removal. Desalination 2004, 171:205-215.
39. Wang Z., Liu G., Fan Z., Yang X., Wang J., Wang S. Experimental study on treatment of electroplating wastewater by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 305:185-195.
40. Chung C.V., Buu N.Q., Chau N.H. Influence of surface charge and solution pH on the performance characteristics of a nanofiltration membrane. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2005, 6:246-250.
41. Mehiguene K., Garba Y., Taha S., Gondrexon N., Dorange G. Influence of operating conditions on the retention of copper and cadmium in aqueous solutions by nanofiltration: experimental results and modelling. Sep. Purif. Technol. 1999, 15:181-187.
42. Padilla A.P., Saitua H. Performance of simultaneous arsenic, fluoride and alkalinity (bicarbonate) rejection by pilot-scale nanofiltration. Desalination 2010, 257:16-21.
43. Paugam L., Taha S., Dorange G., Jaouen P., Quéméneur F. Mechanism of nitrate ions transfer in nanofiltration depending on pressure, pH, concentration and medium composition. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 231:37-46.
44. Santafé-Moros A., Gozálvez-Zafrilla J.M., Lora-García J. Nitrate removal from ternary ionic solutions by a tight nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2007, 204:63-71.
45. Mehiguene K., Taha S., Gondrexon N., Cabon J., Dorange G. Copper transfer modeling through a nanofiltration membrane in the case of ternary aqueous solution. Desalination 2000, 127:135-143.
46. Childress A., Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 24:3710-3716.
47. 2. Desalination 2006, 191:303-308.
48. Hodgson T.D. Selective properties of cellulose acetate membranes towards ions in aqueous solutions. Desalination 1970, 8:99-138.
49. Dean J.A. Lange's Handbook of Chemistry 1999, McGraw-Hill, New York. 15th Edition.
50. Vanysek P. Ionic conductivity and diffusion at infinite dilution. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 2002, CRC Press, Boca Raton. 83rd edn. D.R. Lide (Ed.).
51. Philips C.S.G., Williams R.J.P. Inorganic Chemistry 1965, Clarendon, Oxford.