Nanofiltration performance of lead solutions: Effects of solution pH and ionic strength

Water Science and Technology: Water Supply

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 193-200

  Saikaew, Wuthikorn ^a   Mattaraj, Supatpong ^a   Jiraratananon, Ratana ^b  

^a UBON RATCHATHANI UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b KING MONGKUT'S UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY THONBURI   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Flux decline; Lead solution; Nanofiltration; Solution chemistry

Indexed keywords

IONS; LEAD; NANOFILTRATION; PH;

AROMATIC POLYAMIDES; ELECTRICAL DOUBLE LAYERS; FLUX DECLINE; LEAD CONCENTRATION; MEMBRANE SURFACE; NANOFILTRATION PERFORMANCE; NEGATIVELY CHARGED MEMBRANES; SOLUTION CHEMISTRY;

IONIC STRENGTH;

LEAD; LEAD CHLORIDE; LEAD NITRATE;

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HYDROGEN; LEAD; MEMBRANE; NITRATE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PH; POLYMER; ULTRAFILTRATION;

ARTICLE; IONIC STRENGTH; NANOFILTRATION; PH; ROOM TEMPERATURE; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY;

EID: 77955085385     PISSN: 16069749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2010.062     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Amiri, M. C. & Samiei, M. 2007 Enhancing permeate flux in a RO plant by controlling membrane fouling. Desalination 207, 361-369. (Pubitemid 46404552)
2. Anne, C. O., Trebouet, D., Jaouen, P. & Quemeneur, F. 2001 Nanofiltration of seawater: fractionation of mono-and multivalent cations. Desalination 140, 67-77. (Pubitemid 33036458)
3. Bellona, C. & Drewes, J. E. 2005 The role of membrane surface charge and solute physico-chemical properties in the rejection of organic acids by NF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 249, 227-234.
4. Childress, A. E. & Elimelech, M. 2007 Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci 119, 253-268.
5. Cho, J., Amy, G. & Pellegrino, J. 1999 Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes. Water Res. 33(11), 2517-2526. (Pubitemid 29322413)
6. Choi, S., Yun, Z., Hong, S. & Ahn, K. 2001 The effect of co-existing ions and surface characteristics of nanomembranes on the removal of nitrate and fluoride. Desalination 133, 53-64. (Pubitemid 32337804)
7. Cotruvo, J. A. & Vogt, C. D. 1990 Rationale for water quality standards and goals. Water Quality and Treatment, 4th edition. McGraw-Hill, Inc, New York, USA.
8. Donnan, F. G. 1995 Theory of membrane equilibria and membrane potentials in the presence of non dialysing electrolytes. A contribution to physical-chemical physiology. J. Membr. Sci. 100, 45-55.
9. Eriksson, P. 1988 Water and salt transport through two types of polyamide composite membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 36, 297-313.
10. Frares, N. B., Taha, S. & Dorange, G. 2005 Influence of the operating conditions on the elimination of zinc ions by nanofiltration. Desalination 185, 245-253. (Pubitemid 41799733)
11. Hong, S. & Elimelech, M. 1997 Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 132, 159-181.
12. Ipek, U. 2005 Removal of Ni(II) and Zn(II) from an aqueous solution by reverse osmosis. Desalination 174, 161-169. (Pubitemid 40696919)
13. Jarusutthirak, C., Mattaraj, S. & Jiraratananon, R. 2007 Influence of inorganic scalants and natural organic matter on nanofiltration membrane fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 287, 138-145.
14. Kilduff, J. E., Mattaraj, S. & Belfort, G. 2004 Flux decline during nanofiltration of naturally-occurring dissolved organic matter: effects of osmotic pressure, membrane permeability, and cake formation. J. Membr. Sci. 239(1), 39-53.
15. Ku, Y., Chen, S.-W. & Wang, W.-Y. 2005 Effect of solution composition on the removal of copper ions by nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 43, 135-142.
16. Labbez, C., Fievet, P., Szymczyk, A., Vidonne, A., Foissy, A. & Pagetti, J. 2003 Retention of mineral salts by a polyamide nanofiltration membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 30, 47-55.
17. 4 in nanofiltration. Water Res. 40, 806-816.
18. Lisdonk, C. A. C., van Paassen, J. A. M. & Schippers, J. C. 2000 Monitoring scaling in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane systems. Desalination 132, 101-108.
19. Mattaraj, S., Jarusutthirak, C. & Jiraratananon, R. 2008 A combined osmotic pressure and cake filtration model for crossflow nanofiltration of natural organic matter. J. Membr. Sci. 322, 475-483.
20. Mehiguene, K., Garba, Y., Taha, S., Gondrexon, N. & Dorange, G. 1999 Influence of operating conditions on the retention of copper and cadmium in aqueous solutions by nanofiltration: experimental results and modelling. Sep. Purif. Technol. 15, 181-187.
21. ++, and humic acid) in water. Desalination 138, 271-281.
22. Schaep, J. & Vandecasteele, C. 2001 Evaluating the charge of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 188, 129-136.
23. Tahaikt, M., El Habbani, R., Ait Haddou, A., Achary, I., Amor, Z., Taky, M., Alami, A., Boughriba, A., Hafsi, M. & Elmidaoui, A. 2007 Fluoride removal from groundwater by nanofiltration. Desalination 212, 46-53.
24. Taylor, J. S. & Jacobs, Ed. P. 1996 Reverse osmosis and nanofiltration. In: Mallevialle, J., Odendaal, P. E. & Weisner, M. R. (eds) Water Treatment Membrane Processes. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
25. Teixeira, M. R., Rosa, M. J. & Nystrom, M. 2005 The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 265, 160-166.
26. Turek, M., Dydo, P., Trojanowska, J. & Campen, A. 2007 Adsorption/co-precipitation reverse osmosis system for boron removal. Desalination 205, 192-199. (Pubitemid 46418893)
27. Van Reenan, A. J. & Sanderson, R. D. 1992 Dynamically formed hydrous zirconium (IV) oxide-polyelectrolyte membranes. VII. Poly (acrylic acid-co-vinyl acetate) and poly (acrylic acid-covinyl alcohol) membranes: the effect of feed salt concentration on membrane properties. Desalination 85, 247-262.
28. Yaroshchuk, E. & Staude, A. 1992 Charged membranes for low pressure reverse osmosis properties and applications. Desalination 86, 115-134.