Forest conservation planning

Environmental Science and Engineering (Subseries: Environmental Science)

Volumn , Issue 9783642319990, 2014, Pages 205-226

  White, Michael D ^a   Strittholt, James R ^b  

^a Tejon Ranch Conservancy   (United States)

^b Conservation Biology Institute ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Conservation planning; EMDS; Forest connectivity; Forest conservation; Recreation; Spatial decision support

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

CONSERVATION PLANNING; EMDS; FOREST CONNECTIVITY; FOREST CONSERVATION; RECREATION; SPATIAL DECISION SUPPORT;

FORESTRY;

EID: 84922417857     PISSN: 18635520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32000-2_9     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Rylands AB, Konstant WR, Flick P, Pilgrim J, Oldfield S, Magain G, Hilton-Taylor C (2002) Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 6:91-100
2. Callicott JB (1990) Whither conservation ethics? Conserv Biol 4:15-20
3. Chan KMA, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC (2006) Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol 4(11):e379. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379
4. Conservation International (2005) Biodiversity hotspots revisited. Center for Applied Biodiversity Science at Conservation International. http://www.biodiversityhotspots.org/xp/hotspots
5. Crooks KR (2002) Relative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation. Conserv Biol 16:488-502
6. Daily GC, Alexander S, Ehrlich PR, Goulder L, Lubchenco J, Matson PA, Mooney HA, Postel S, Schneider SH, Tilman D, Woodwell GM (1997) Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues Ecol 2:1-18
7. Duane T (1996) Recreation in the Sierra. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project, final report to Congress, vol 2, Assessments and scientific basis for management options. University of California at Davis, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources. http://ceres.ca.gov/snep/pubs/
8. Duane T (1999) Shaping the Sierra: nature, culture, and conflict in the changing West. University of California Press, Berkeley
9. Franklin JF, Fites-Kaufmann JA (1996) Assessment of late successional forests in the Sierra Nevada. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project, final report to Congress, vol 2, Assessments and scientific basis for management options. University of California at Davis, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources. http://ceres.ca.gov/snep/pubs/
10. Gordon SN, Johnson KN, Reynolds KM, Crist P, Brown N (2004) Decision support systems for forest biodiversity: evaluation of current systems and future needs. Final Report-Project A10 National Commission on Science and Sustainable Forestry. www.ncssf.org
11. Graber DM (1996) Status of terrestrial invertebrates. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project, final report to Congress, vol 2, Assessments and scientific basis for management options. University of California at Davis, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources. http://ceres.ca.gov/snep/pubs/
12. Groves CR (2003) Drafting a Conservation Blueprint: A Practitioner's Guide to Planning for Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, DC
13. Humphries HC, Bourgeron PS, Reynolds KM (2008) Suitability for conservation as a criterion in regional conservation network selection. Biodivers Conserv 17:467-492
14. Jennings S, Nussbaum R, Judd N, Evans T (2003) The high conservation value forest toolkit, 1st edn. Proforest. http://hcvnetwork.org/
15. Kattelmann R (1996) Hydrology and water resources. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project, final report to Congress, vol 2, Assessments and scientific basis for management options. University of California at Davis, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources. http://ceres.ca.gov/snep/pubs/
16. Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF (2002) Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach. Island Press, Washington, DC
17. Manzuli AG (2005) Knowledge-based monitoring and evaluation system of land use: assessing the ecosystem conservation status in the influence area of a gas pipeline in Bolivia. Doctoral dissertation Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultäten der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany
18. Marcot BG (1997) Biodiversity of old forests of the West: a lesson from our elders. In: Kohm KA, Franklin JF (eds) Creating a forestry for the 21st century: the science of ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, DC
19. Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243-253
20. McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
21. Millennium Assessment (The) (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment synthesis report. www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.aspx
22. Mittermeier RA, Meyers N, Mittermeier CG (1999) Hotspots: earth's biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. CEMEX, Mexico City
23. Pinchot G (1947) Breaking new ground. Brace and Company, Harcourt, New York
24. Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47:769-784
25. Reynolds KM (2001) Fuzzy logic knowledge bases in integrated landscape assessment: examples and possibilities. General technical report PNW-GTR-521. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, OR
26. Reynolds K (2003) Ecosystem management decision support extension. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, OR
27. Reynolds KM, Jensen M, Andreasen J, Goodman I (2000) Knowledge-based assessment of watershed condition. Comput Electron Agric 27:315-333
28. Saunders DN, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18-32
29. Scott JMFW, Davis RG, McGhie RG, Wright RG, Groves C, Estes J (2001) Nature reserves: do they capture the full range of America's biological diversity? Ecol Appl 11:999-1007
30. Shevock JR (1996) Status of rare and endemic plants. In: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project, final report to Congress, vol 2, Assessments and scientific basis for management options. University of California at Davis, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources. http://ceres.ca.gov/snep/pubs/
31. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project (SNEP) (1996) Sierra Nevada ecosystem project, final report to Congress, vol 1, Assessment summaries and management strategies. University of California at Davis, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources
32. Staus N, Strittholt JR, DellaSala DA (2010) Evaluating high conservation value in western Oregon, USA, with a decision support model. Conserv Biol 24:711-720
33. Stoms DM, McDonald JM, Davis FW (2000) Knowledge-based site suitability assessment for new NRS reserves for the proposed UC Merced campus. University of California, Santa Barbara. http://www.biogeog.ucsb.edu/projects/snner/nrs_report.pdf
34. Stoms DM, McDonald JM, Davis FW (2002) Fuzzy assessment of land suitability for scientific research reserves. Environ Manage 29:545-558
35. Strittholt JR, Frost PA, Staus N, Rustigian H, Heilman G Jr (2006) A global conservation prioritization assessment using EMDS. A special report for the Full Circle Foundation, Hong Kong
36. Strittholt JR, Staus N, Heilman G Jr, Bergquist J (2007) Mapping high conservation value and endangered forests in the Alberta Foothills using spatially explicit decision support tools. Special report for Limited Brands. http://consbio.org/what-we-do/mapping-high-conservationvalue- and-endangered-forests-in-the-alberta-foothills-using-spatially-explicit-decision-supporttools?searchterm=alber
37. Swart JAA, van der Windt HJ, Keulartz J (2001) Valuation of nature in conservation and restoration. Restor Ecol 9(2):230-238
38. Trombulak SC, Frissell CA (2000) Review of the ecological effects of roads and terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conserv Biol 14:18-30
39. U.S. Forest Service (USFS) (2001) Sierra Nevada forest plan amendment, final environmental impact statement. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Jan
40. White MD, Heilman GE, Stallcup JA (2005a) Science assessment for the Sierra checkerboard initiative. Prepared for the trust for public land, July. http://consbio.org/files/sierraassessment-p1-report.pdf
41. White MD, Heilman GE, Stallcup JA (2005b) Online technical appendix to the science assessment for the Sierra checkerboard initiative. Prepared for the trust for public land, July. http://consbio.org/what-we-do/science-assessment-for-the-sierra-checkerboard-2/full-metadata-index/ science-assessment-for-the-sierra-checkerboard
42. White MD, Heilman GE, Budge NA (2008) Conservation stratgey for implementing the Sierra checkerboard initiative. Prepared for the trust for public land, Jan. http://consbio.org/files/Final%20Sierra%20Checkerboard%20Conservation%20Strategy.pdf
43. Zhu Z, Reed BC (eds) (2012) Baseline and projected future carbon storage and greenhouse-gas fluxes in ecosystems of the Western United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1797, p 192. http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1797/