White Blood Cell Counts. Reference Methodology.

Clinics in Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 11-24

  Chabot Richards, Devon S ^a   George, Tracy I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated hematology analyzer; Differential count; Laboratory instrumentation; Leukocyte; Methodology; White blood cell count

Indexed keywords

MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY CD3; OKT 4; OKT 8;

BASOPHIL; CYTOCHEMISTRY; EOSINOPHIL COUNT; ERYTHROCYTE COUNT; FLUORESCENCE; GRANULOCYTE; HEMATOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; HEMATOLOGY ANALYZER; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; LEUKOCYTE DIFFERENTIAL COUNT; LIGHT SCATTERING; LYMPHOCYTE COUNT; MONOCYTE; NEUTROPHIL COUNT; RADIOFREQUENCY; REVIEW; THROMBOCYTE AGGREGATION; AUTOMATION; HISTORY; PROCEDURES; TRENDS;

AUTOMATION; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; LEUKOCYTE COUNT;

EID: 84922355119     PISSN: 02722712     EISSN: 15579832     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2014.10.007     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. George T.I. Malignant or benign leukocytosis. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2012, 2012:475-484.
2. Chabot-Richards D.S., George T.I. Leukocytosis. Int J Lab Hematol 2014, 36(3):279-288.
3. Valent P. Low blood counts: immune mediated, idiopathic, or myelodysplasia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2012, 2012:485-491.
4. Rümke C.L. The imprecision of the ratio of two percentages observed in differential white blood cell counts: a warning. Blood Cells 1985, 11(1):137-140.
5. Krause J.R. The automated white blood cell differential. A current perspective. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1994, 8(4):605-616.
6. Cornet E., Perol J.P., Troussard X. Performance evaluation and relevance of the CellaVision DM96 system in routine analysis and in patients with malignant hematological diseases. Int J Lab Hematol 2008, 30(6):536-542.
7. Cornbleet J. Spurious results from automated hematology cell analyzers. Lab Med 1983, 14:509-514.
8. Zandecki M., Genevieve F., Gerard J., et al. Spurious counts and spurious results on haematology analysers: a review. Part II: white blood cells, red blood cells, haemoglobin, red cell indices and reticulocytes. Int J Lab Hematol 2007, 29(1):21-41.
9. Zandecki M., Genevieve F., Gerard J., et al. Spurious counts and spurious results on haematology analysers: a review. Part I: platelets. Int J Lab Hematol 2007, 29(1):4-20.
10. Kalpatthi R., Thompson B., Lu M., BABY HUG Investigators, et al. Comparison of hematologic measurements between local and central laboratories: data from the BABY HUG trial. Clin Biochem 2013, 46(3):278-281.
11. Grimaldi E., Carandente P., Scopacasa F., et al. Evaluation of the monocyte counting by two automated haematology analysers compared with flow cytometry. Clin Lab Haematol 2005, 27(2):91-97.
12. Ducrest S., Meier F., Tschopp C., et al. Flow cytometric analysis of basophil counts in human blood and inaccuracy of hematology analyzers. Allergy 2005, 60(11):1446-1450.
13. Amundsen E.K., Henriksson C.E., Holthe M.R., et al. Is the blood basophil count sufficiently precise, accurate, and specific?: three automated hematology instruments and flow cytometry compared. Am J Clin Pathol 2012, 137(1):86-92.
14. Barnes P.W., McFadden S.L., Machin S.J., et al. The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis. Lab Hematol 2005, 11(2):83-90.
15. Sireci A., Schlaberg R., Kratz A. Amethod for optimizing and validating institution-specific flagging criteria for automated cell counters. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010, 134(10):1528-1533.
16. Kwon M.J., Nam M.H., Kim S.H., et al. Evaluation of the nucleated red blood cell count in neonates using the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800 analyzer. Int J Lab Hematol 2011, 33(6):620-628.
17. Letestu R., Marzac C., Audat F., et al. Use of hematopoietic progenitor cell count on the Sysmex XE-2100 for peripheral blood stem cell harvest monitoring. Leuk Lymphoma 2007, 48(1):89-96.
18. Maenhout T.M., Marcelis L. Immature granulocyte count in peripheral blood by the Sysmex haematology XN series compared to microscopic differentiation. JClin Pathol 2014, 67(7):648-650.
19. Nierhaus A., Linssen J., Wichmann D., et al. Use of a weighted, automated analysis of the differential blood count to differentiate sepsis from non-infectious systemic inflammation: the intensive care infection score (ICIS). Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 2012, 11(2):109-115.
20. Nierhaus A., Klatte S., Linssen J., et al. Revisiting the white blood cell count: immature granulocytes count as a diagnostic marker to discriminate between SIRS and sepsis-a prospective, observational study. BMC Immunol 2013, 14:8.
21. Cimenti C., Erwa W., Herkner K.R., et al. The predictive value of immature granulocyte count and immature myeloid information in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012, 50(8):1429-1432.
22. Zimmermann M., Cremer M., Hoffmann C., et al. Granularity Index of the SYSMEX XE-5000 hematology analyzer as a replacement for manual microscopy of toxic granulation neutrophils in patients with inflammatory diseases. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011, 49(7):1193-1198.
23. Raess P.W., van de Geijn G.J., Njo T.L., et al. Automated screening for myelodysplastic syndromes through analysis of complete blood count and cell population data parameters. Am J Hematol 2014, 89(4):369-374.
24. Zhu Y., Cao X., Tao G., et al. The lymph index: a potential hematological parameter for viral infection. Int J Infect Dis 2013, 17(7):e490-e493.