TElehealth in CHronic disease: Mixed-methods study to develop the TECH conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Salisbury, Chris ^a   Thomas, Clare ^a   O'Cathain, Alicia ^b   Rogers, Anne ^c   Pope, Catherine ^c   Yardley, Lucy ^c   Hollinghurst, Sandra ^a   Fahey, Tom ^d   Lewis, Glyn ^e   Large, Shirley ^f   Edwards, Louisa ^a   Rowsell, Alison ^c   Segar, Julia ^g   Brownsell, Simon ^b   Montgomery, Alan A ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^d ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS IN IRELAND   (Ireland)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^f NHS Direct   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CHRONIC DISEASE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DEPRESSION; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SELF CARE; TELEHEALTH; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CONCEPT FORMATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; TELEMEDICINE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONCEPT FORMATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84922341012     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006448     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. DH/Long Term Conditions. Long Term Conditions Compendium of Information 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment-data/file/216528/dh-134486.pdf
2. Darkins A, Ryan P, Kobb R, et al. Care Coordination/Home Telehealth: The systematic implementation of health informatics, home telehealth, and disease management to support the care of veteran patients with chronic conditions. Telemed J E Health 2008;14: 1118-26.
3. Cruickshank J. Telehealth: What can the NHS learn from experience at the US Veterans Health Administration? 2012. http://www.2020health.org/dms/2020health/downloads/reports/Telehealth-VA/Telehealth%20VA.pdf
4. Renewing Health: Regions of Europa working together for health. http://www.renewinghealth.eu/en/home
5. Cartwright M, Hirani SP, Rixon L, et al. Effect of telehealth on quality of life and psychological outcomes over 12 months (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): Nested study of patient reported outcomes in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2013;346: F653.
6. Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernandez J-L, et al. Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): Nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2013;346: F1035.
7. Bower P, Kennedy A, Reeves D, et al. A cluster randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a 'whole systems' model of self-management support for the management of long-Term conditions in primary care: Trial protocol. Implement Sci 2012;7: 7.
8. Wootton R. Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management-An evidence synthesis. J Telemed Telecare 2012;18: 211-20.
9. Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: A systematic overview. PLoS Med 2011;8: E1000387.
10. Car J, Huckvale K, Hermens H. Telehealth for long term conditions. BMJ 2012;344: E4201.
11. Murray E, Burns J, See TS, et al. Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(4): CD004274.
12. Barlow J, Singh D, Bayer S, et al. A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-Term conditions. J Telemed Telecare 2007;13: 172-9.
13. Pare G, Jaana M, Sicotte C. Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: The evidence base. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14: 269-77.
14. Deshpande A, Khoja S, McKibbon A, et al. Real-Time (synchronous) telehealth in primary care: Systematic review of systematic reviews. Technology Report No 100. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 2008.
15. Polisena J, Coyle D, Coyle K, et al. Home telehealth for chronic disease management: A systematic review and an analysis of economic evaluations. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2009;25: 339-49.
16. Pope C, Rowsell A, O'Cathain A, et al. For want of evidence: A meta-review of home-based telehealth for the management of long-Term conditions. 2011. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/healthlines/documents/popeetal.pdf
17. Lilford RJ, Foster J, Pringle M. Evaluating eHealth: How to make evaluation more methodologically robust. PLoS Med 2009;6: E1000186.
18. Campbell NC, Murray E, Darbyshire J, et al. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. BMJ 2007;334: 455-9.
19. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications-some alternative approaches: Theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int J Med Inform 2001;64: 39-56.
20. Mackert M. Expanding the theoretical foundations of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12: 49-50.
21. Gammon D, Johannessen LK, Sorensen T, et al. An overview and analysis of theories employed in telemedicine studies. A field in search of an identity. Methods Inf Med 2008;47: 260-9.
22. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991;50: 179-211.
23. Michie S, van Stralen M, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 2011;6: 42.
24. Ritterband LM, Thorndike FP, Cox DJ, et al. A behavior change model for internet interventions. Ann Behav Med 2009;38: 18-27.
25. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 1989;13: 319-40.
26. Dellifraine JL, Dansky KH. Home-based telehealth: A review and meta-Analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2008;14: 62-6.
27. Pare G, Moqadem K, Pineau G, et al. Clinical effects of home telemonitoring in the context of diabetes, asthma, heart failure and hypertension: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2010;12: E21.
28. Merriel SWD, Andrews V, Salisbury C. Telehealth interventions for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-Analysis. Prev Med 2014;64: 88-95.
29. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, et al. Realist synthesis: An introduction: ESRC Research Methods Programme. University of Manchester, 2004.
30. Segar J, Rogers A, Salisbury C, et al. Roles and identities in transition: Boundaries of work and inter-professional relationships at the interface between telehealth and primary care. Health Soc Care Community 2013;21: 606-13.
31. Steventon A, Tunkel S, Blunt I, et al. Effect of telephone health coaching (Birmingham OwnHealth) on hospital use and associated costs: Cohort study with matched controls. BMJ 2013;347: F4585.
32. Edwards L, Thomas C, Gregory A, et al. Are people with chronic diseases interested in using telehealth? J Med Internet Res 2014;16: E123.
33. Green L, Kreuter M. Health program planning: An educational and ecological approach. 4th edn. New York, NY: McGrawhill, 2005.
34. Thomas CL, Man MS, O'Cathain A, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a telehealth intervention to support the management of long-Term conditions: Study protocol for two linked randomized controlled trials. Trials 2014;15: 36.
35. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von KM. Improving outcomes in chronic illness. Manag Care Q 1996;4: 12-25.
36. Singh D. Transforming chronic care: Evidence about improving care for people with long-Term conditions. University of Birmingham, 2005.
37. Bodenheimer T. Interventions to improve chronic illness care: Evaluating their effectiveness. Dis Manag 2003;6: 63-71.
38. Ham C. The ten characteristics of the high-performing chronic care system. Health Econ Policy Law 2010;5: 71-90.
39. NICE. Hypertension: Clinical management of primary hypertension in adults. CG127 2011. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG127
40. NICE. Lipid Modification: Cardiovascular risk assessment and the modification of blood lipids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Clinical Guideline 67. 2008.
41. Pearson TA, Blair SN, Daniels SR, et al. AHA guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke: 2002 update: Consensus panel guide to comprehensive risk reduction for adult patients without coronary or other atherosclerotic vascular diseases. Circulation 2002;106: 388-91.
42. Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, et al. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women-2011 update: A guideline from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011;123: 1243-62.
43. Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Eur Heart J 2007;28: 2375-414.
44. NICE. Depression in adults. The treatment and management of depression in adults. Clinical guideline 90. 2009. http://www.nice.org. uk/CG90
45. Work group on major depressive disorder. Practice guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder. 2010. http://psychiatryonline.org/pb/assets/raw/sitewide/practice-guidelines/guidelines/mdd.pdf
46. Greaves CJ, Sheppard KE, Abraham C, et al. Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions. BMC Public Health 2011;11: 119.
47. Katon WJ, Lin EH, Von KM, et al. Collaborative care for patients with depression and chronic illnesses. N Engl J Med 2010;363: 2611-20.
48. AbuDagga A, Resnick HE, Alwan M. Impact of blood pressure telemonitoring on hypertension outcomes: A literature review. [Review]. Telemed J 2010;16: 830-8.
49. Agarwal R, Bills JE, Hecht TJ, et al. Role of home blood pressure monitoring in overcoming therapeutic inertia and improving hypertension control: A systematic review and meta-Analysis. Hypertension 2011;57: 29-38.
50. Roumie CL, Elasy TA, Greevy R, et al. Improving blood pressure control through provider education, provider alerts, and patient education: A cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2006;145: 165-75.
51. NICE. Medicines adherence: Involving patients in decisions about prescribed medicines and supporting adherence. CG76. 2011. http://www.nice.org.uk/CG76
52. Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, et al. Internet-based chronic disease self-management: A randomized trial. Med Care 2006;44: 964-71.
53. Lorig KR, Holman H. Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med 2003;26: 1-7.
54. Solomon M, Wagner SL, Goes J. Effects of a web-based intervention for adults with chronic conditions on patient activation: Online randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2012;14: E32.
55. Bosworth HB, Olsen MK, Grubber JM, et al. Two self-management interventions to improve hypertension control: A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009;151: 687-95.
56. Green BB, Cook AJ, Ralston JD, et al. Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008;299: 2857-67.
57. Shea S, Weinstock RS, Starren J, et al. A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13: 40-51.
58. Glynn LG, Murphy AW, Smith SM, et al. Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(3): CD005182.
59. McManus RJ, Mant J, Bray EP, et al. Telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension (TASMINH2): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;376: 163-72.
60. Catwell L, Sheikh A. Evaluating eHealth interventions: The need for continuous systemic evaluation. PLoS Med 2009;6: E1000126.
61. Bodenheimer T. The future of primary care: Transforming practice. N Engl J Med 2008;359: 2086-9.
62. McLean S, Protti D, Sheikh A. Telehealthcare for long term conditions. BMJ 2011;342: D120.
63. May CR, Finch TL, Cornford J, et al. Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done? BMC Health Serv Res 2011;11: 131.
64. Bosworth HB, Olsen MK, Dudley T, et al. Patient education and provider decision support to control blood pressure in primary care: A cluster randomized trial. Am Heart J 2009;157: 450-6.
65. Pingree S, Hawkins R, Baker T, et al. The value of theory for enhancing and understanding e-Health interventions. Am J Prev Med 2010;38: 103-9.
66. Baker LC, Macaulay DS, Sorg RA, et al. Effects of care management and telehealth: A longitudinal analysis using medicare data. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013;61: 1560-7.
67. Kidholm K, Ekeland AG, Jensen LK, et al. A model for assessment of telehealth applications: MAST. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2012;28: 44-51.
68. Gustafson D, Wise M, Bhattacharya A, et al. The effects of combining web-based eHealth with telephone nurse case management for pediatric asthma control: A randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2012;14: E101.
69. Greenhalgh T, Russell J, Ashcroft RE, et al. Why national eHealth programs need dead philosophers: Wittgensteinian reflections on policymakers' reluctance to learn from history. Milbank Q 2011;89: 533-63.