Investigation of 208 consecutive cases of cervical cone biopsies with regard to indication, negative samples and quality control

Acta Cytologica

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 185-190

  Weigl, Gerhard ^a   Pokieser, Wolfgang ^b   Schuller, Beatrix ^b   Weigert, Monika ^b   Ulrich, Walter ^b   Sevelda, Paul ^b   Breitenecker, Gerhard ^c  

^a Inst f Labormedizin   (Austria)

^b GENERAL HOSPITAL LINZ   (Austria)

^c Austrian Society of Cytology   (Austria)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Cervical cancer; Cervix neoplasms; Quality control

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRIA; CYTOLOGY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DYSPLASIA; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METAPLASIA; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUNCH BIOPSY; QUALITY CONTROL; SCREENING TEST; TISSUE SECTION; TREATMENT INDICATION; UTERINE CERVICITIS; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX DISEASE; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VIRUS INFECTION; WART VIRUS;

CANCER VIRUS; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPES;

EID: 33645463169     PISSN: 00015547     EISSN: 19382650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000325929     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Golbang P, Scurry J, de Jong S, McKenzie D, Planner R, Pyman J, Davoren R: Investigation of 100 consecutive negative cone biopsies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:100-104
2. Massad LS, Chronopoulos FT, Cejtin HE: Correlating cone biopsy histology with operative indications. Gynecol Oncol 1997;65:286-290
3. Spitzer M, Chernys AE, Shifrin A, Ryskin M: Indications for cone biopsy: Pathologic correlation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:74-79
4. Spitzer M, Ryskin M, Chernys AE, Shifrin A: The value of repeat Pap smear at the time of initial colposcopy. Gynecol Oncol 1997;67:3-7
5. National Cancer Institute: The 1988 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses. Acta Cytol 1989;33:567-574
6. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O'Connor D, Prey M, Raab S, Sherman M, Wilbur D, Wright T Jr, Young N, Forum Group Members, Bethesda 2001 Workshop: The 2001 Bethesda System: Terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002;287:2114-2119
7. Soost HJ, Lange HJ, Lehmacher W, Ruffing-Kullmann B: The validation of cervical cytology: Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Acta Cytol 1991;35:8-14
8. Papanicolaou GN, Traut HF: Diagnosis of Uterine Cancer by Vaginal Smear. New York, Commonwealth Fund, 1943, p 2
9. Gay JD, Donaldson LD, Goellner JR: False-negative results in cervical cytologic studies. Acta Cytol 1985;29:1043-1046
10. Morell ND, Taylor JR, Snyder RN, Ziel HK, Saltz A, Willie S: False-negative cytology rates in patients in whom invasive cervical cancer subsequently developed. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:41-45
11. Demay RM: The Art and Science of Cytopathology. Chicago, ASCP Press, 1996, p 142
12. Nauth HF: Gynäkologische Zytodiagnostik. Stuttgart,Georg Thieme Verlag, 2002, p 357
13. Novotny DB, Maygarden SJ, Johnson DE, Frable WJ: Tubal metaplasia: A frequent potential pitfall in the cytologic diagnosis of endocervical glandular dysplasia on cervical smears. Acta Cytol 1992;36:1-10
14. Burja IT, Thompson SK, Sawyer WL Jr, Shurbaji MS: Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears: A study with cytohistologic correlation. Acta Cytol 1999;43:351-356
15. Ducatman BS, Wang HH, Jonasson JG, Hogan CL, Antonioli DA: Tubal metaplasia: A cytologic study with comparison to other neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions of the endo-cervix. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:98-103; discussion 103-105
16. Suh KS, Silverberg SG: Tubal metaplasia of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1990;9:122-128
17. Demay RM: Hyperchromatic crowded groups: Pitfalls in pap smear diagnosis. Am J Clin Pathol (suppl) 2000;114:S36-S43
18. Jonasson JG, Wang HH, Antonioli DA, Ducatman BS: Tubal metaplasia of the uterine cervix: A prevalence study in patients with gynecologic pathologic findings. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1992;11:89-95
19. Chadli-Debbiche A, Philippe E, Ritter J, Baldauf JJ, Badre L, Bretz-Grenier MF, Rivasi F: Non-invasive lesions of the cervical glands: Apropos of a study of 431 conization specimens. Arch Anat Cytol Pathol 1997;45:5-12
20. Adad SJ, Souza MA, Etchebehere RM, Saldanha JC, Falco VA, Murta EF: Cyto-histological correlation of 219 patients submitted to surgical treatment due to diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Sao Paulo Med J 1999;117:81-84
21. Skehan M, Soutter WP, Lim K, Krausz T, Pryse-Davies J: Reliability of colposcopy and directed punch biopsy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:811-816
22. Heatley MK, Bury JP: The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix. Cytopathology 1998;9:93-99
23. Joseph MG, Cragg F, Wright VC, Kontozoglou TE, Downing P, Marks FR: Cyto-histological correlates in a colposcopic clinic: A 1-year prospective study. Diagn Cytopathol 1991;7:477-481