Perineal transanal approach: A new standard for laparoscopic sphincter-saving resection in low rectal cancer, a randomized trial

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 260, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 993-999

  Denost, Quentin ^a,c   Adam, Jean Philippe ^a,c   Rullier, Anne ^b,c   Buscail, Etienne ^a,c   Laurent, Christophe ^a,c   Rullier, Eric ^a,c  

^a HÔPITAL SAINT ANDRÉ   (France)

^b HÔPITAL PELLEGRIN   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

Circumferential margin; Laparoscopy; Low rectal cancer; Perineal approach; Sphincter saving resection

Indexed keywords

CAPECITABINE; FLUOROURACIL;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ABSCESS; ADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT THERAPY; ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; CANCER COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORBIDITY; MULTIPLE CYCLE TREATMENT; ORGAN PRESERVATION; PARALLEL DESIGN; PERINEAL RECTAL DISSECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM CANCER; RECTUM SURGERY; RISK REDUCTION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL PATIENT; ANAL CANAL; COLON RESECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; LAPAROSCOPY; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; PROCEDURES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; COLECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NATURAL ORIFICE ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84922311212     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000766     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, et al. Rectal cancer: The Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997. Arch Surg. 1998;133: 894-899.
2. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopicassisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25: 3061-3068.
3. Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96: 982-989.
4. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): Short-Termoutcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11: 637-645.
5. van Der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): Short-Term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14: 210-218.
6. Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wutrich P, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: Long-Term oncologic results. Ann Surg. 2009;250: 54-61.
7. Marks J, Mizrahi B, Dalane S, et al. Laparoscopic transanal abdominal transanal resection with sphincter preservation for rectal cancer in the distal 3 cm of the rectum after neoadjuvant therapy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24: 2700-2707.
8. Park JS, Choi GS, Jun SH, et al. Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: Intermediate-Term oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg. 2011;254: 941-946.
9. Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26: 303-312.
10. Rullier E, Denost Q, Vendrely V, et al. Low rectal cancer: Classification and standardization of surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56: 560-567.
11. Laurent C, Paumet T, Leblanc F, et al. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs open surgery approach. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14: 35-41.
12. Church JM, Raudkivi PJ, Hill GL. The surgical anatomy of the rectum: A review with particular relevance to the hazards of rectal mobilisation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1987;2: 158-166.
13. Shihab OC, Heald RJ, Rullier E, et al. Defining the surgical planes on MRI improves surgery for cancer of the low rectum. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10: 1207-1211.
14. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, et al. Low rectal cancer: A call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23: 9257-9264.
15. Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J, et al. The modern abdominoperineal excision: The next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg. 2005;242: 74-82.
16. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8: 18.
17. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, et al. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet. 1986;2: 996-999.
18. Rullier A, Laurent C, Vendrely V, et al. Impact of colloid response on survival after preoperative radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29: 602-606.
19. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, van derWorp E, et al. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: Clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20: 1729-1734.
20. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240: 205-213.
21. Laurent C, Leblanc F, Gineste C, et al. Laparoscopic approach in surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94: 1555-1561.
22. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-Term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-Assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365: 1718-1726.
23. Marks GJ, Marks JH, Mohiuddin M, et al. Radical Sphincter preservation surgery with coloanal anastomosis following high-dose external irradiation for the very low lying rectal cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1998;146: 161-174.
24. Funahashi K, Koike J, Teramoto T, et al. Transanal rectal dissection: A procedure to assist achievement of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for bulky tumor in the narrow pelvis. Am J Surg. 2009;197: E46-e50.
25. Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, et al. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Surgery. 2009;146: 483-489.
26. Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, et al. NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc. 2010;24: 1205-1210.
27. Tuech JJ, Bridoux V, Kianifard B, et al. Natural orifice total mesorectal excision using transanal port and laparoscopic assistance. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37: 334-335.
28. Dumont F, Goere D, Honore C, et al. Transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision combined with single-port laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55: 996-1001.
29. Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): A multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2009;373: 811-820.
30. Hiranyakas A, da SilvaG, Wexner SD, et al. Factors influencing circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15: 298-303.
31. Rullier A, Gourgou-Bourgade S, Jarlier M, et al. Predictive factors of positive circumferential resection margin after radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer: The French randomised trial ACCORD12/0405 PRODIGE 2. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49: 82-89.
32. West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, et al. Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26: 3517-3522.
33. Targarona EM, Balague C, Pernas JC, et al. Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy. Ann Surg. 2008;247: 642-649.