A randomised trial of robotic and open prostatectomy in men with localised prostate cancer

BMC Cancer

Volumn 12, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Gardiner, Robert A ^a,b,c   Yaxley, John ^b   Coughlin, Geoff ^b   Dunglison, Nigel ^b   Occhipinti, Stefano ^d   Younie, Sandra ^e   Carter, Rob ^e   Williams, Scott ^f   Medcraft, Robyn J ^a,b   Bennett, Nigel ^a   Lavin, Martin F ^a,g   Chambers, Suzanne K ^a,c,d,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b ROYAL BRISBANE AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^f PETER MACCALLUM CANCER CENTRE   (Australia)

^g QIMR BERGHOFER MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^h CANCER COUNCIL QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CANCER LOCALIZATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DECISION MAKING; DEPRESSION; DISTRESS SYNDROME; FATIGUE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INTESTINE FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; MENTAL FUNCTION; OPEN PROSTATECTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROBOTICS; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ADULT; AGED; AUSTRALIA; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84872367910     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712407     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-189     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Practice Guidelines 2002, National Health and Medical Research Council: Canberra, Evidence-based information and recommendations for the management of localised prostate cancer, [available at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/cp88.pdf]., National Health and Medical Research Council.
2. MacKenzie RR, Chapman SS, Barratt AA, Holding SS. "The news is [not] all good": misrepresentations and inaccuracies in Australian news media reports on prostate cancer screening. Medical Journal of Australia 2007, 187(9):507-510.
3. Ball AJ, Gambill B, Fabrizio MD, Davis JW, Given RW, Lynch DF, Shaves M, Schellhammer PF. Prospective Longitudinal Comparative Study of Early Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Short-Term Evaluation of Five Approaches from a Single Institution. Journal of Endourology 2006, 20(10):723-731. 10.1089/end.2006.20.723, 17094746.
4. Berryhill R, Jhaveri J, Yadav R, Leung R, Rao S, El-Hakim A, Tewari A. Robotic Prostatectomy: A Review of Outcomes Compared with Laparoscopic and Open Approaches. Urology 2008, 72(1):15-23. 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.038, 18436288.
5. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Conventional and robotic. Urology 2005, 66:101-104.
6. Wood DP, Schulte R, Dunn RL, Hollenbeck BK, Saur R, Wolf JS, Montie JE. Short-Term Health Outcome Differences Between Robotic and Conventional Radical Prostatectomy. Urology 2007, 70(5):945-949. 10.1016/j.urology.2007.06.1120, 17919694.
7. Nelson JB, et al. Debate: Open radical prostatectomy vs. laparoscopic vs. robotic. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations 2007, 25:490-493. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.05.018, 18047958.
8. Bennett K. Robotic Surgery: da Vinci and beyond. Bulletin of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 2012, 94(1):8-9.
9. Pow-Sang JM, Velasquez J, Myers MD, Rodriguez AR, Kang LC. Pure Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Prostate Cancer. Cancer Control 2007, 14(3):250-257.
10. Smith J. Radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer. World Journal of Urology in press.
11. Novara G, Ficarra V, D'Elia C, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. Prospective Evaluation With Standardised Criteria for Postoperative Complications After Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. European Urology 2010, 57(3):363-370. 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.032, 19944519.
12. Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y. Cost Comparison of Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer. European Urology 2010, 57(3):453-458. 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.008, 19931979.
13. Liberman D, Trinh Q-D, Jeldres C, Zorn KC. Is robotic surgery cost-effective: yes. Current Opinion in Urology 2012, 22(1):61-65. 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834d543f, 22037320.
14. Lotan Y. Is robotic surgery cost-effective: no. Current Opinion in Urology 2012, 22(1):66-69. 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834d4d76, 22080872.
15. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gøtzsche PC, Lang T. Group ftC: The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001, 134(8):663-694.
16. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1983, 67(6):361-370. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x, 6880820.
17. Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine 1979, 41(3):209-218.
18. Epping-Jordan JE, Compas BE, Howell DC. Predictors of Cancer Progression in Young Adult Men and Women: Avoidance, Intrusive Thoughts, and Psychological Symptoms. Health Psychology 1994, 13(6):539-547.
19. Lepore SJ, Helgeson VS. Social constraints, intrusive thoughts, and mental health after prostate cancer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 1998, 17(1):89-106.
20. O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making 1995, 15(1):25-30. 10.1177/0272989X9501500105, 7898294.
21. Steginga SK, Occhipinti S. Dispositional optimism as a predictor of men's decision-related distress after localized prostate cancer. Health Psychology 2006, 25(2):135-143.
22. Wei JT, Dunn RL, Litwin MS, Sandler HM, Sanda MG. Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology 2000, 56(6):899-905. 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00858-X, 11113727.
23. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997, 49(6):822-830. 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00238-0, 9187685.
24. Schover LR, Canada AL, Yuan Y, Sui D, Neese L, Jenkins R, Rhodes MM. A randomized trial of internet-based versus traditional sexual counseling for couples after localized prostate cancer treatment. Cancer 2012, 118(2):500-509. 10.1002/cncr.26308, 21953578.
25. Medical Outcomes Trust and Quality Metric Incorporated SF-36: SF-36v2TM Health Survey: IQOLA SF36v2 Standard, English (Australia), 7/03 1992, 2003. Health Assessment Lab: Trust and Quality Metric Incorporated, Lincoln, RI: Medical Outcomes, Medical Outcomes Trust and Quality Metric Incorporated.
26. Richardson JRJ. Monash University. Centre for Health Economics, Monash University. Faculty of Business Economics 2011, Business and Economics, Centre for Health Economics: Overview and Utility Scoring Algorithm: Monash University, Modelling the Utility of Health States with the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) 8D Instrument.
27. Cadilhac D, Magnus A, Cumming T, Sheppard L, Pearce D, Carter R. The health and economic benefits of reducing disease risk factors - Research Report. In. Victoria, Australia: VicHealth 2009,
28. Magnus A, Mihalopoulos C, Carter R. Evaluation of Preventative Health Interventions: Impact on Production Gains. In. Victoria, Australia: Victorian Department of Treasury and Finance 2008, 2008:2008.
29. Raudenbush SW. Optimal Design Software for Multi-level and Longitudinal Research (Version 3.01). In.: Available from www.wtgrantfoundation.org or from sitemaker.umich.edu/group-based
30. Jo B. Statistical power in randomized intervention studies with noncompliance. Psychological Methods 2002, 7(2):178-193.