Conventionalism

Conventionalism

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-330

  Ben Menahem, Yemima ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922017062     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511584404     Document Type: Book

References (437)

1. Anderson, J. L. 1967. Principles of Relativity Physics, New York: Academic Press.
2. Anderson, R., Vetharaniam, I., and Stedman, G. E. 1998. –Conventionality of Synchronisation, Gauge Dependence and Test Theories of Relativity,— Ph ysics Reports 295, 93-180.
3. Aspray, W. and Kitcher, P. (eds.) 1988. History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Mathematics 11, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4. Ayer, A.J. 1936.–Truth by Convention: A Symposium,— Analysis 4, 17-22.
5. Ayer, A.J. 1936a. Language, Truth and Logic, 2nd ed., 1946, London: Victor Gol-lancz.
6. Ayer, A.J. (ed.) 1959. Logical Positivism, New York: Free Press.
7. Babak, S. V. and Grishchuk L. P. 2000. –The Energy Momentum Tensor for the Gravitational Field,— Physical Review D 61 024038.
8. Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S. 1984. Scepticism, Rules and Language, Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Barbour, J. B. and Pfister, H. (eds.) 1995. Mach'sPrinciple
10. Bar-Elli, G. 1996. The Sense ofReference, Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
11. Barrett, R. B. and Gibson, R. F. (eds.) 1990. Perspectives on Quine, Oxford: Black-well.
12. Bekenstein, J. D. 2001. –The Limits of Information,— Studies in the History and Philosophy ofModern Physics 32, 511 -24.
13. Bell, D. and Vossenkuhl, W. (eds.) 1992. Wissenschaft und Subjektivitat/Science and Subjectivity, Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
14. Belnap, N. 1962.–Tonk, Plonk and Plink,— Analysis 22, 130-4.
15. Benacerraf, P. 1973. “Mathematical Truth,” Journal of Philosophy 70, 661–79
16. Benacerraf, P. 1985. –Skolem and the Skeptic,— Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 59, 85-115. Also in Shapiro 1996, 419-50.
17. Benacerraf, P. and Putnam, H. (eds.) 1983. Philosophy ofMathematics, Selected Writings, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Ben-Menahem, Y. 1993. –Struggling with Causality: Einstein's Case,— Science in Context 12, 291-310.
19. Ben-Menahem, Y. 1995. –Pragmatism and Revisionism: James's Conception of Truth,— InternationalJournal of Philosophical Studies 3, 270-89.
20. Ben-Menahem, Y. 1998. –Explanation and Description: Wittgenstein on Convention,— Synthese 115, 99-130.
21. Ben-Menahem, Y. 2001. –Convention: Poincare and Some of His Critics,— British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52, 471-513.
22. Ben-Menahem, Y. 2001 a. –Direction and Description,— Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32, 621-35.
23. Ben-Menahem, Y. (ed.) 2005. Hilary Putnam, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Ben-Menahem, Y. 2005a. –Putnam on Skepticism,— in Ben-Menahem 2005, 125-55
25. Bergsrom, L. 1990. –Quine on Underdetermination,— in Barrett and Gibson 1990, 38-52.
26. Bergsrom, L. 1993. –Quine, Underdetermination and Skepticism,— Journal of Philosophy 90, 331 -58.
27. Bernays, P. 1930. –Die Philosophie der Mathematik und die Hilbertsche Beweis-theorie,— Blatter fur deutsche Philosophie 4, 326-67.Also in Bernays 1976, 17-61.
28. Bernays, P. 1967. –What Do Some Recent Results in Set Theory Suggest?— in Lakatos 1967, 109-12.
29. Bernays, P. 1976. Abhandlungen zur Philosophie der Mathematik, Darmstadt: Wis-senschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
30. Berry, G. D. W. 1953. –On the Ontological Significance of the Lowenheim-Skolem Theorem,— in M. White (ed.), Academic Freedom, Logic and Religion, Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, University of Pennsylvania Press, 39-55.
31. Beth, E. W. 1953. –On Padoa's Method in the Theory of Definition,— Indagationes Mathematicae 15, 330-9.
32. Beth, E. W. 1959. The Foundations of Mathematics, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
33. Beth, E. W. 1963. –Carnap's Views on the Advantages of Constructed Systems over Natural Languages in the Philosophy of Science,— in Schilpp 1963, 469-502.
34. Black, M. 1936.–Truth by Convention: A Symposium,— Analysis 4, 28-32.
35. Black, M. 1942. –Conventionalism in Geometry and the Interpretation of Necessary Statements,— Philosophy ofScience 9, 335-49.
36. Boghossian, P. and Peacocke, C. 2000. New Essays on the A Priori, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
37. Braithwaite, R. B. (1955). Scientific Explanation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Brenner, A. A. 1990. –Holism a Century Ago: The Elaboration of Duhem's Thesis,— Synthese 83, 325-35.
39. Buchdahl, H. A. 1981. Seventeen Simple Lectures on General Relativity Theory, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
40. Burali-Forti, C. 1901. –Sur les differentes methodes logiques pour la definition du nombre reel,— Bibliotheque du Congres international de philosophie 3, Paris: A. Colin, 289-308.
41. Buzaglo, M. 2002. The Logic of Conceptual Expansion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Capek, M. 1971. Bergson and Modern Physics, R. S. Cohen and M. W. Wartofsky (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7, Dordrecht: Reidel.
43. Carnap, R. 1922. Der Raum. Ein Beitrag zur Wissenschaftslehre, Kant-Studien. Erganzungshefte 56, Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.
44. Carnap, R. 1923.–Über die Aufgabe der Physik und die Anwendung des Grund- satzes der Einfachheit,— Kant-Studien 28, 90-107.
45. Carnap, R. 1924. –Dreidimensionalitat des Raumes und Kausalitat,— Annalen der Philosophie undphilosophischen Kritik 4, 105-30.
46. Carnap, R. 1927. –Eigentliche und uneigentliche Begriffe,— Symposion: Philosophi- sche Zeitschrift fur Forschung und Aussprache 1, 355-74.
47. Carnap, R. [1928] 1967. Der logische Aufbau der Welt, Berlin: Weltkreis; trans. R. George as The Logical Structure of the World, Berkeley: University of California Press.
48. Carnap, R. 1930. –Die alte und die neue Logik,— Erkenntnis 1, 12-26; trans. Isaac Levi as –The Old and the New Logic,— in Ayer 1959, 133-46.
49. Carnap, R. 1930a. –Die Mathematik als Zweig der Logik,— Blatter fur Deutsche Philosophie 4, 298-310.
50. Carnap, R. 1931.–Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache,— Erkenntnis 2, 219-41; trans. A. Pap as –The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language,— in Ayer 1959, 60-82.
51. Carnap, R. [1932] 1934. –Die physikalische Sprache als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft,— Erkenntnis 2, 432-65; trans. and with an introduction by Max Black as The Unity of Science, London: Kegan Paul, revised by Carnap for the English edition.
52. Carnap, R. [1934] 1937. Logische Syntax der Sprache, Vienna: Julius Springer; trans. A. Smeaton as The Logical Syntax ofLanguage, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
53. Carnap, R. 1935. Philosophy and Logical Syntax, London: Kegan Paul.
54. Carnap, R. 1936-7.–Testability and Meaning,— Philosophy of Science 3, 420-71; 4, 2 -40.
55. Carnap, R. 1942. Introduction to Semantics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56. Carnap, R. 1950 –Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology,— Revue International de Philosophie 4, 20-40. Also in Carnap 1956, 205-21
57. Carnap, R. 1956. Meaning and Necessity, 2nd ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58. Carnap, R. 1963. –Carnap's Intellectual Autobiography,— in Schilpp 1963, 1-84.
59. Carnap, R. 1963a. –W. V. Quine on Logical Truth,— in Schilpp 1963, 915-21.
60. Carnap, R. 1963b. –E. W. Beth on Constructed Language Systems,— in Schilpp 1963,927-32.
61. Carnap, R. 1966. Philosophical Foundations of Physics: An Introduction to the PhilosophyofScience, New York: Basic Books.
62. Carroll, L. 1895. –What the Tortoise Said to Achilles,— Mind 4, 278-80.
63. Cartwright, N. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford: Clarendon.
64. Ciufolini, I., Dominici, D., and Lusanna, L. (eds.) 2003. 2001: A Relativistic Spacetime Odyssey, Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
65. Clark, P. and Hale, B. (eds.) 1994. Reading Putnam, Oxford: Blackwell.
66. Coffa, A.J. 1979. –Effective Affinities,— in Salmon 1979, 267-304.
67. Coffa, A. J. 1986. –From Geometry to Tolerance: Sources of Conventionalism in Nineteenth-Century Geometry,— in R. G. Colodny (ed.), From Quarks to Quasers: Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 3-70.
68. Coffa, A.J. 1987. –Carnap, Tarski, and the Search for Truth,— Nouus 21, 547-72.
69. Coffa, A. J. 1991. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station, ed. L. Wessels, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Conant,J. 1992. –The Search for Logically Alien Thought: Descartes, Kant, Frege, and the Tractat s,— Philosophical Topics 20, 115-80.
71. Conant, J. 2000. –Elucidation and Nonsense in Frege and Early Wittgenstein,— in Crary and Read 2000, 174-217.
72. Corcoran, J. 1971.–A Semantic Definition of Definition,— Journal of Symbolic Logic 36, 366-7.
73. Corcoran, J. 1980. –Categoricity,— History and Philosophy ofLogic 1, 137-207.
74. Cornu, A. 1891. –Sur une experience recente, determinant la direction de la vibration dans la lumiere polarisee,— Comptes Rendus des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences 112, 186-9.
75. Corry, L. 2004. David Hilbert and the Axiomatization of Physics 1898—1918: From Grundlagen der Geometrie to Grundlagen der Physik, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
76. Crary, A. and Read, R. (eds.) 2000. The New Wittgenstein, London: Routledge.
77. Creath, R. 1987. –The Initial Reception of Carnap's Doctrine of Analyticity,— Noûs 21, 477-99.
78. Creath, R. (ed.) 1990. Dear Carnap, Dear Van: The Quine-Carnap Correspondence and Related Work, Berkeley: University of California Press.
79. Creath, R. 1992. –Carnap's Conventionalism,— Synthese 93, 141 -65.
80. Curry, H. B. 1954. –Remarks on the Definition and Nature of Mathematics,— in Benacerraf and Putnam 1983, 202-6.
81. Davidson, D. 1984. –On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme,— in Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Clarendon, 183-98.
82. Davidson, D. 1995. –Pursuit of the Concept of Truth,— in Leonardi and Santam- brogio 1995, 7-21.
83. Dedekind,J. W. R. [1888] 1932.–Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen?— Gesammelte mathematische Werke, ed. R Fricke, E. Noether, and O. Ore, Braunschweig: F. Vieweg & Sohn, 3:335-91; trans. W. W. Beman in Ewald 1996, 2:790-833.
84. Diamond, C. 1991. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy and the Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. Diamond, C. 1991 a. –Throwing Away the Ladder: How to Read the Tractatus,— in Diamond 1991, 179-204.
86. Diamond, C. 1991 b. –The Face of Necessity,— in Diamond 1991, 243-66.
87. Dieks, D. 1987. –Gravitation as a Universal Force,— Synthese 73, 381 -97.
88. Dingler, H. 1913. Grundlagen der Naturphilosophie, Leipzig: Verlag Unesma.
89. Dreben, B. 1990. –Quine,— in Barrett and Gibson 1990, 81 -95.
90. Dreben, B. and Floyd, J. 1991.–Tautology: How Not to Use a Word,— Synthese 87, 23-49.
91. Duhem, P. 1892. –Quelques reflexions au sujet des theories physiques,— Revue des Questions Scientifiques 31 (2nd series), 139-77; trans. R. Ariew and P. Baker as –Some Reflections on the Subject of Physical Theories,— in Duhem 1996, 1 -28.
92. Duhem, P. 1893. –Review of Poincare 1892, vol. 2,— Revue des Questions Scientifiques 33 (2nd series), 257-9.
93. Duhem, P. 1894. –Quelques reflexions au sujet de la physique experimentale,— Revue des Questions Scientifiques 36 (2nd series), 179-229; trans. R. Ariew and P. Baker as –Some Reflections on the Subject of Experimental Physics,— in
94. Duhem, P. 1894a. –Les theories de l'optique,— Revue des Deux Mondes 123, 94-125.
95. Duhem, P. [1903] 1980. L'Evolution de la mechanique,Paris: Joanin; trans. M. Cole as The Evolution ofMechanics, Alphen aan den Rijn, Nederlans: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.
96. Duhem, P. [1906] 1954. La Theorie physique: son objet, sa structure, 2nd ed., Paris: M. Riviere & Cie, 1914; trans. P. P. Wiener as The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
97. Duhem, P. [1908] 1969. 'EQZEIN TA 0AINOMENA, Paris: A. Hermann; trans. E. Doland and C. Maschler as To Save the Phenomena, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
98. Duhem, P. 1913-1959. Le Systeme du monde, histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon a Copernic, 10 vols., Paris: Herman.
99. Duhem, P. 1996. Essays in the History and Philosophy ofScience, ed. and trans. R. Ariew and P. Barker, Indianapolis: Hackett.
100. Dummett, M. 1978. Truth and Other Enigmas, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
101. Dummett, M. 1978a. –The Significance of Quine's Indeterminacy Thesis,— in Dummet 1978, 375-419.
102. Dummett, M. 1978b. –Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics,— in Dummett 1978, 166-85.
103. Dummett, M. 1991. The Logical Basis ofMetaphysics, London: Duckworth.
104. Earman,J. 1989. World Enough and Space-Time, Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
105. Earman, J. and Norton, J. D. 1987. –What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Story,— British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38, 515-25.
106. Eddington, A. 1920. Space, Time and Gravitation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
107. Eddington, A. 1928. The Nature of the Physical World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
108. Eddington, A. 1939. The Philosophy ofPhysical Science, New York: Macmillan.
109. Ehlers, J., Pirani, F. A. E., and Schild, A. 1972. –The Geometry of Free Fall and Light Propagation,— in O'Raifeartaigh 1972, 63-84.
110. Einstein, A. 1912. –Lichtgeschwindigkeit und Statik des Gravitationfeldes,— Annalen der Physik 38, 355-69. Also in Einstein 1996, document 3, 129-43; trans. as –The Speed of Light and the Statics of the Gravitational Field— in Einstein 1996a, 95-106.
111. Einstein, A. 1916. –Die Grundlagen der allgemeinen Relativitatstheorie,— Annalen der Physik 49, 769-822. Also in Einstein 1997, document 30, 283-339;trans. as –The Foundations of the General Theory of Relativity— in Einstein 1997a, 147-200.
112. Einstein, A. [1917] 1920. Über die spezielle und die allgemeine Relativitatstheorie, Braunschweig: F. Vieweg & Sohn; trans. R. W. Lawson as Relativity: The Special and the General Theory, London: Methuen.
113. Einstein, A. 1920.–Ather und Relativitatstheorie,— Berlin: Julius Springer. Also in Einstein 2002, document 38, 306-23; trans. as –Ether and the Theory of Relativity— in Einstein 2002a, 161 -82.
114. Einstein, A. 1920a. Discussions of Bad Nauheim lectures. Physikalische Zeitschrift 21, 650-1, 662, 666-8. Also in Einstein 2002, document 46, 350-9.
115. Einstein, A. 1921.–Geometrie und Erfahrung,— Sitzungsberichte derpreuss. Akad. Der Wissenschaften 1, 123-30. Also in Einstein 2002, document 52, 383-405; trans. S. Bargmann as –Geometry and Experience— in Einstein 1954, 232-45 and in Einstein 2002a, 208–22.
116. Einstein, A. 1922. The Meaning of Relativity, 5th ed., 1956, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Also in Einstein 2002, document 47, 497-589.
117. Einstein, A. 1927. –Newtons Mechanik und ihr Einfluss auf die Gestaltung der theoretischen Physik,— Die Naturwissenschaften 15, 273-6; trans. S. Bargmann as –The Mechanics of Newton and Their Influence on the Development of Theoretical Physics— in Einstein 1954, 253-61.
118. Einstein, A. 1933. –On the Method of Theoretical Physics. The Herbert Spencer Lecture, delivered at Oxford, 10 June 1933,— Oxford: Clarendon; new trans. S. Bargmann in Einstein 1954, 270-6.
119. Einstein, A. 1934. Mein Weltbild, Amsterdam: Querido Verlag.
120. Einstein, A. 1936. –Physics and Reality,— Journal of the Franklin Institute 221,313-47. Also in Einstein 1954, 290-322.
121. Einstein, A. 1949. –Reply to Criticisms,— in Schilpp 1949, 663-8.
122. Einstein, A. 1950. –On the Generalized Theory of Gravitation,— Scientific American 182/4, 13-17. Also in Einstein 1954, 341-55.
123. Einstein, A. 1954. Ideas and Opinions, New York: Crown.
124. Einstein, A. 1996. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 4, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
125. Einstein, A. 1996a. English supplement to Einstein 1996; trans. Anna Beck.
126. Einstein, A. 1997. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 6, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
127. Einstein, A. 1997a. English supplement to Einstein 1997; trans. Alfred Engel.
128. Einstein, A. 2002. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 7, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
129. Einstein, A. 2002a. English supplement to Einstein 2002; trans. Alfred Engel.
130. Einstein, A., Infeld, L., and Hoffmann, B. 1938. –Gravitational Equations and the Problem of Motion,— Annals ofMathematics 39, 65-100.
131. Elkana, Y. 1974. The Discovery ofthe Conservation ofEnergy, London: Hutchinson.
132. Ewald, W. B. (ed.) 1996. From Kant to Hilbert, A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics, 2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon.
133. Feigl, H. 1975. –Homage to Rudolf Carnap,— in Hintikka 1975, xiii-xvii.
134. Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.) 1962. Scientific Explanation, Space and Time, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
135. Feyerabend, P. 1962. –Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism,— in Feigl and Maxwell 1962, 28-97.
136. Feynman, R. P. 1971. Lectures on Gravitation, ed. F. B. Morinigo and W. G. Wagner, Pasadena: California Institute of Technology.
137. Field, H. H. 1980. Science Without Numbers, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
138. Fine, A. 1971. –Reflections on a Relational Theory of Space,— Synthese 22, 448-81.
139. Fine, A. 1986. –Unnatural Attitudes: Realist and Instrumentalist Attachments to Science,— Mind 95, 149-79.
140. Floyd, J. 2001. –Number and Ascriptions of Number in Wittgenstein's Tractatus,— in Floyd and Shieh 2001, 145-91.
141. Floyd, J. and Shieh, S. (eds.) 2001. Future Pasts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
142. Fock, V. [1955] 1966. The Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation, 2nd revised ed.; trans. from the Russian by N. Kemmer, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
143. Fraenkel, A. A., Bar Hillel, Y., and Levy, A. 1973. Foundations of Set Theory, 2nd ed., Amsterdam: North-Holland.
144. Frege, G. 1884. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, Breslau: W. Koebner; trans. J.Austin as The Foundations of Arithmetic, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1950.
145. Frege, G. 1893. Grundgesetze der Artithmetik, Jena: Verlag Hermann Pohle; trans. M. Furth as The Basic Laws ofArithmetic, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1964.
146. Frege, G. 1903.–Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie— (Erste Serie), Jahresbericht derDeutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 12, 319-24 (part I), 368-75 (part II), in Frege 1967, 262-72; trans. E.H.W. Kluge as –On the Foundations of Geometry— (First Series) in Kluge 1971, 22-37.
147. Frege, G. 1906.–Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie— (Zweite Serie), Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 15, 293-309 (part I), 377-403 (part II), 423-30 (part III), in Frege 1967, 281-323; trans. E.H.W. Kluge as "On the Foundations of Geometry" (Second Series) in Kluge 1971, 49-112.
148. Frege, G. 1967. Kleine Schriften, ed. I. Angelelli, Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
149. Frege, G. 1967a. Unbekannte Briefe Freges Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie und Antwortbrief Hilbertsan Frege, in Frege 1967,407-18; trans. E.H.W. Kluge as –Correspondence with Hilbert— in Frege 1971, 6-21.
150. Frege, G. 1971. On the Foundations ofGeometry and Formal Theories ofArithmetic, ed. and trans. E.H.W. Kluge, New Haven; CT: Yale University Press.
151. Friedman, M. 1983. Foundations ofSpace-Time Theories, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
152. Friedman, M. 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
153. Friedman, M. 1996. –Poincare's Conventionalism and the Logical Positivists,— in Greffe et al. 1996, 333-44.
154. Friedman, M. 1999. Reconsidering Logical Positivism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
155. Gergonne, J. D. 1818. –Essai sur la theorie des definitions,— Annales de Mathematiques 9, 1-35.
156. Giannoni, C. B. 1971. Conventionalism in Logic, The Hague: Mouton.
157. Gibson, R. F. Jr. 1986.–Translation, Physics and Facts of the Matter,— in Hahn and Schilpp 1986, 139-54.
158. Giedymin, J. 1982. Science and Convention, Oxford: Pergamon.
159. Giedymin,J. 1991. –Geometrical and Physical Conventionalism of Henri Poincare in Epistemological Formulation,— Studies in the History and Philosophy ofScience 22, 1-22.
160. Giere, R. N. and Richardson A. W. (eds.) 1996. Origins of Logical Empiricism, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
161. Glymour, C. 1971. –Theoretical Realism and Theoretical Equivalence,— in R. C. Buck and R. S. Cohen (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy ofScience 8, Dordrecht: Reidel, 275-88.
162. Glymour, C. 1972.–Topology, Cosmology and Convention,— Synthese 24, 195-218.
163. Glymour, C. 1980. Theory and Evidence, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
164. Gödel, K. 1930. –Die Vollstandigkeit der Axiome des logischen Funktio- nenkalkuls, Monatshefte fur Mathematik und Physik 37, 349-60; trans. S. Bauer- Mengelberg as —The Completeness of the Axioms of the Functional Calculus of Logic," in van Heijenoort 1967, 582-91.
165. Gödel, K. 1931.–Über formal unentscheidbare Satze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme, I,— Monatshefte fuUr Mathematik und Physik 38, 178-98; trans. J. van Heijenoort as –On Formally Undecidable Propositions ofPrincipia Mathematica and Related Systems,— in van Heijenoort 1967, 596-616.
166. Gödel, K. 1953. –Is Mathematics Syntax of Language?— in Gödel 1995, 335-62.
167. Gödel, K. 1961. –The Modern Developments of the Foundations of Mathematics in the Light of Philosophy,— in Gödel 1995, 375-88.
168. Gödel, K 1995. Kurt Gödel: Collected Works, ed. S. Feferman et al., vol. 3, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
169. Goldfarb, W. D. 1988. –Poincaree against the Logicists,— in Aspray and Kitcher 1988, 61-81.
170. Goldfarb, W. D. 1995. –Introductory Note to Gödel (1953),— in Gödel 1995, 324-34.
171. Goldfarb, W. D. 1996. –The Philosophy of Mathematics in Early Positivism,— in Giere and Richardson 1996, 213-30.
172. Goldfarb, W. and Ricketts, T. 1992. –Carnap and the PhilosophyofMathematics,— in Bell and Vossenkuhl 1992, 61 -78.
173. Gould, C. C. and Cohen, R. S. (eds.) 1994. Artifacts, Representations and Social Practice, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
174. Grayling, A. C. 1998. An Introduction to PhilosophicalLogic, 3rd ed., Oxford: Black- well.
175. Grassmann, H. 1844. Die lineale Ausdehnungslehre, Leipzig: Otto Wigand Verlag; trans. in Grassmann 1995, 9-297.
176. Grassmann, H. 1995. A New Branch of Mathematics, The Ausdehnungslehre of 1844 and Other Works; trans. L. C. Kannenberg, Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.
177. Greene, B. 1999. The Elegant Universe, New York: W.W. Norton.
178. Greene, B. 2004. The Fabric ofthe Cosmos, New York: Knopf.
179. Greffe,J. L., Heinzmann, G., and Lorenz, K. (eds.) 1996. Henri Poincare, Science and Philosophy, International Congress Nancy 1994, Berlin: Akademie Verlag; Paris: Albert Blanchard.
180. Grünbaum, A. 1962. –Geometry, Chronometry, and Empiricism,— in Feigl and Maxwell 1962, 405-526.
181. Grünbaum, A. 1968. Geometry and Chronometry, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
182. Grünbaum, A. 1973. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, 2nd ed., Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12, Dordrecht: Reidel.
183. Grünbaum, A. 1976. –The Duhemian Argument,— in Harding 1976, 116-31.
184. Hacker, P. M. S. 1992. –Wittgenstein on Frazer's —Golden Bough," Iyyun 41, 277-300.
185. Hahn, L. E. and Schilpp P. A. (eds.) 1986. The Philosophy ofW. V. Quine, Library of Living Philosophers 18,LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
186. Hale, B. and Wright, C. 2000. –Implicit Definition and the APriori,— in Boghossian and Peacocke 2000, 286-319.
187. Harding, S. (ed.) 1976. Can Theories Be Refuted? Dordrecht: Reidel.
188. Hawking, S. W. and Israel, W. (eds.) 1979. General Relativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
189. Healey, R. 1987. –Critical Review of Michael Friedman's Foundations of Space-Time Theories,— Noûs 21, 595-601.
190. Held, A. (ed.) 1980. General Relativity and Gravitation: One Hundred Years after the Birth ofAlbert Einstein, New York: Plenum.
191. Hellman, G. 1989. Mathematics without Numbers, Oxford: Clarendon.
192. Helmholtz, H. von. [1847] 1882.–Über die Erhaltung der Kraft,— in Wis- senschaftliche Abhandlungen, 1, Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth, 12-75.
193. Helmholtz, H. von. 1876. –The Origin and Meaning of Geometrical Axioms,— Mind 1, 301 -21. Also in Ewald 1996, vol. 2, 663-85.
194. Hempel, C. G. 1958. –The Theoretician's Dilemma: A Study in the Logic of Theory Construction,— in Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York: Free Press, 1965,173-226
195. Henkin, L. 1950. –Completeness in the Theory of Types,— Journal of Symbolic Logic 15,81-91.
196. Hertz, H. [1894] 1956. Die Principien der Mechanik, Leipzig: Barth; trans. D. E. Jones and J. T. Walley as The Principles ofMechanics, New York: Dover.
197. Hilbert, D. [1899] 1902. –Grundlagen der Geometrie,— in Festschrift zur Feier der Enthullung des Gauss-Weber Denkmals in Gottingen, Leipzig: Teubner; trans. E.J. Townsend as The Foundations ofGeometry, Chicago: Open Court.
198. Hilbert, D. [1899a] 1971. Grundlagen der Geometrie, 10th ed., Leipzig: Teubner; trans. Leo Unger as Foundations ofGeometry, 2 nd ed. revised and expanded by Paul Bernays, La Salle, IL: Open Court.
199. Hilbert, D. 1905.–Über die Grundlagen der Logik und der Arithmetik,— Ver-handlungen des Dritten Internationalen Mathematiker-Kongresses vom 8 bis 13 August 1904, Leipzig: Teubner, 174-85; trans. Beverly Woodward as –On the Foundations of Logic and Arithmetic— in van Heijenoort 1967, 130-8.
200. Hilbert, D. 1922. –Neubegrundung der Mathematik; Erste Mitteilung,— in Gesam-melte Abhandlungen, Berlin: Springer, 1932-5, 3, 157-77; trans. W. Ewald as –The New Grounding of Mathematics— in Ewald 1996, 2, 1115-34.
201. Hilbert, D. 1926.–Über das Unendliche,— Mathematische Annalen 95, 161-90; trans. S. Bauer-Mengelberg as –On the Infinite— in van Heijenoort 1967, 36792.
202. Hintikka, J. (ed.) 1975. RudolfCarnap, Logical Empiricist, Synthese Library 83, Dordrecht: Reidel.
203. Hintikka, J. 1990. –Quine as a Member of the Tradition of the Universality of Language,— in Barrett and Gibson 1990, 159-74.
204. Hintikka, J. 1992. –Carnap's Work in the Foundations of Logic and Mathematics in a Historical Perspective,— Synthese 93, 167-89.
205. Hintikka, J. 1993. –Ludwig's Apple Tree: On the Philosophical Relations between Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle,— in Stadler 1993.
206. Hintikka, J. 2001. –Ernst Mach at the Crossroads of Twentieth-Century Philosophy,— in Floyd and Shieh 2001, 81-100.
207. Hintikka, M. B. and Hintikka, J. 1986. Investigating Wittgenstein, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
208. Hiskes, A. L. 1986. –Friedman on the Foundations of Space-Time Theories,— Erkenntnis 25, 111 -26.
209. Hoefer, C. 1994. –Einstein's Struggle for a Machian Gravitation Theory,— Studie in the History and Philosophy ofScience 25, 287-335.
210. Horwich P. 1997. –Implicit Definition, Analytic Truth, and Apriori Knowledge,— Noûs 31, 423-40.
211. Howard, D. 1990. –Einstein and Duhem,— Synthese 83, 363-84.
212. Howard, D. 1994. –Einstein, Kant, and the Origins of Logical Empiricism,— in Salmon and Wolters 1994, 45-105.
213. Howard, D. 1996. –Relativity, Eindeutigkeit, and Monomorphism: Rudolf Carnap and the Development of the Categoricity Concept in Formal Semantics,— in Giere and Richardson 1996, 115-64.
214. Howard, D. and Stachel,J. (eds.) 1989. Einstein and the History of General Relativity, Einstein Studies 1, Boston and Berlin: Birkhauser.
215. Hylton, P. 2001 –'The Defensible Province of Philosophy': Quine's 1934 Lectures on Carnap,— in Floyd and Shieh 2001, 257-76.
216. James, W. [1907-9] 1955. Pragmatism, Cleveland: Meridian.
217. Kreisel, G. 1958. –Wittgenstein's Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics,— British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9, 135-58.
218. Kretschmann, E. 1917.–Über den physikalischen Sinn der Relativitatspostulate, A. Einsteins neue und seine ursprungliche Relativitatstheorie,— Annalen der Physik53,575-614
219. Kripke, S. 1980. Namingand Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
220. Kripke, S. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
221. Kuhn T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
222. Lakatos, I. (ed.) 1967. Problems in the Philosophy ofMathematics, Amsterdam: North- Holland.
223. Lakatos, I. 1981. Proofs and Refutations: The Logic ofMathematical Discovery, ed. J. Worrall and E. Zahar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
224. Laudan, L. 1976. –Grünbaum on 'The Duhemian Argument,' — in Harding 1976, 155-61.
225. Laudan, L. 1977. Progress and Its Problems, Berkeley: University of California Press.
226. Laudan, L. 1990. Science and Relativism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
227. Laudan, L. and Leplin, J. 1991. –Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermina-tion,— Journal of Philosophy 88, 449-72.
228. Leonardi, P. andSantambrogio, M. (eds.) 1995. On Quine, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
229. Levin, Y. 1995. –Synthetic Apriority,— Erkenntnis 43, 137-50.
230. Lewis, C. I. and Langford, C. H. 1932. Symbolic Logic, New York: Century.
231. Lewis, D. 1969. Convention, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
232. Longino, H. E. 2002. The Fate ofKnowledge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
233. Lowenheim, L. 1915"Über Moglichkeiten im Relativkalkul,– Mathematische Annalen 76, 447-70; trans. S. Bauer-Mengelberg as —On Possibilities in the Calculus of Relatives" in van Heijenoort 1967, 228-51.
234. Maiocchi, R. 1990. –Pierre Duhem's The Aim and Structure ofPhysical Theory:A Book against Conventionalism,— Synthese 83, 385-400.
235. Malament, D. B. 1977. –Causal Theories of Time and the Conventionality of Simultaneity,— Nous 11, 293-300.
236. Malament, D. B. (ed.) 2002. Reading Natural Philosophy, Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.
237. Margalit, A. 1992. –Wittgenstein on The Golden Bough,— Iyyun 41, 301 -18.
238. Martin, R. N. D. 1982. “Darwin and Duhem” [Review of Paul 1979], History of Science 20, 64–75.
239. Martin, R. N. D. 1990. –Duhem and the Origins of Statics: Ramifications of the Crisis of 1903-4,— Synthese 83, 337-55.
240. Mates, B. 1972. Elementary Logic, 2nd ed., New York: Oxford University Press.
241. Mauthner, F. 1923. BeitraUge zu einer Kritik der Sprache, 3 vols., 3rd ed., Leipzig: F. Meiner Verlag.
242. McDowell, J. 1998. Mind, Value and Reality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
243. McMullin, E. 1990. –Comment: Duhem's Middle Way,— Synthese 83, 421 -30.
244. Misner, W. C., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A. 1973. Gravitation, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
245. Monk, R. 1990. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius, London: Vintage.
246. Moore, G. E. 1921 -2. –External and Internal Relations,— Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 20, 40-62. Also in Moore, Philosophical Studies, London: K Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1922, 276-309.
247. Moore, G. E. 1954. –Wittgenstein's Lectures in 1930-33,— Mind 63, 1 -15, 289315; 64 1-27. Also in Wittgenstein 1993, 46-114.
248. Morrison, M. 2000. Unifying Scientific Theories, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
249. Mueller, A. and Fine A. 2005. –Realism, Beyond Miracles,— in Ben-Menahem 2005, 83 -124.
250. Myhill, T. R. 1953. –On the Ontological Significance of the Lowenheim-Skolem Theorem,— in M. White (ed.), Academic Freedom, Logic and Religion,APA Eastern Division Meeting, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 57-70.
251. Nagel, E. 1939. –The Formation of Modern Conceptions of Formal Logic in the Development of Geometry,— Osiris 7, 142-224.
252. Nagel, E. 1961. The Structure ofScience, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
253. Narlikar, J. V. and Padmanabhan, T. 1986. Gravity, Gauge Theories and Quantum Cosmology, Dordrecht: Reidel.
254. Norton, J. 1989. –What Was Einstein's Principle of Equivalence?— in Howard and Stachel 1989, 5-47.
255. Norton, J. 1993. –General Covariance and the Foundations of General Relativity: Eight Decades of Dispute,— Reports ofProgress in Physics 56, 791 -858.
256. Norton, J. (1995). –Did Einstein Stumble? The Debate over General Covariance,— Erkenntnis 42, 223-45.
257. Nye, M.J. 1976. –The Moral Freedom of Man and the Determinism of Nature: The Catholic Synthesis of Science and History in the Revue des Questions Scientifiques,— British Journal for the History of Science 9, 274-92.
258. O'Raifeartaigh, L. (ed.) 1972. General Relativity: Papers in Honour of J. L. Synge, Oxford: Clarendon.
259. Padoa, A. 1901. –Essai d'une theorie algebrique des nombres entiers, precede d'une introduction logique a une theorie deductive quelconque,— Bibliotheque du Congres international de philosophie, 3, Paris: A Colin, 309-65; trans. J. van Heijenoort in van Heijenoort 1967, 118-23.
260. Pais, A. 1982. Subtle Is the Lord: The Science and Life ofAlbert Einstein, Oxford: Clarendon.
261. Parsons, C. 1990. –The Structuralist View of Mathematical Objects,— Synthese 84, 303-46.
262. Parsons, C. 1992. –The Transcendental Aesthetic,— in P. Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 62 -100.
263. Parsons, C. 1995. –Quine and Gödel on Analyticity,— in Leonardi and Santambro-gio1995,297-313.
264. Pasch, M. 1882. Vorlesungen Über neuere Geometrie, 2nd ed., 1912, Leipzig: Teubner.
265. Pasch, M. 1882. Vorlesungen Über neuere Geometrie, 2nd ed., 1912, Leipzig: Teubner. Pasch, M. 1892.–Über die Einfuhrung der irrationalen Zahlen,— Mathematische Annalen 40, 149-52.
266. Pa l, H. W. 1979. The Edge ofContingency, Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
267. Peano, G. 1889. IPrincipii di Geometria logicamente esposti, Torino: Fratelli Bocca.
268. Pears, D. 1987. The False Prison, Oxford: Clarendon.
269. Penrose, R. 2004. The Road to Reality, London: Jonathan Cape.
270. Pieri, M. 1901. –Sur la geometrie envisagee comme un systeme purement logique,— In Bibliotheeque du Congrees international de philosophie, 3, Paris: A Colin, 367-404.
271. Pitowsky, I. 1984. –Unified Field Theory and the Conventionality of Geometry,— Philosophy ofScience 51, 685-9.
272. Pitowsky, I. 1994. –On the Concept of Proof in Modern Mathematics,— unpublished.
273. Poincaree, H. 1891. –Sur l'expeerience de M.Wiener,— Comptes rendus des seeances de lAcademie des sciences 112, 325-9.
274. Poincare, H. 1892. Theorie mathematique de la lumieere, 2 vols., Paris: G. Carre.
275. Poincaree, H. 1898. –On the Foundations of Geometry,— The Monist 9, 1 -43.
276. Poincaree, H. 1898a. –De la mesure du temps,— Revue de meetaphysique et de morale 6, 1 -13.
277. Poincaree, H. 1899. –Des fondements de la geeomeetrie,— Revue de meetaphysique et de morale 7, 251-79.
278. Poincare, H. 1900. –Du role de l'intuition et de la logique en mathematiques,— in Compte rendu du deuxieeme Congres international des mathematiques tenu aa Paris du6aui2aout 1900, Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 115-30; trans. G.B. Halsted as –Intuition and Logic in Mathematics— in Ewald 1996, vol. 2, 1012-20.
279. Poincaree, H. 1901. Eelectricitee etoptique, Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
280. Poincare, H. [1902] 1952. La Science et l'hypothese, Paris: Flammarion; trans. W.S. Greenstreet as Science and Hypothesis, New York: Dover.
281. Poincaree, H. 1902a. –Compte rendu et analyses— [ReviewofHilbert 1899], Bulletin des Sciences Mathematiques, 2 ser. 26, 249-72; trans. E. Huntington in Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 10, 1903, 1 -23.
282. Poincaree, H. 1905-6. –Les Matheematiques et la logique,— Revue de meetaphysique et de morale 13, 815-35; 14, 17-34, 294-317; trans. G. B. Halsted as –Mathematics and Logic— in Ewald 1996, vol. 2, 1021-1074.
283. Poincaree, H. 1905a. –The Principles of Mathematical Physics,— The Monist 15, 1 -24.
284. Poincare, H. [1908] 1956. Science et methode, Paris: Flammarion; trans. F. Maitland as Science and Method, New York: Dover.
285. Poincaree, H. 1913. The Foundations ofScience, Lancaster, PA: Science Press.
286. Poincare, H. [1913a] 1963. Dernieeres pensees, Paris: Flammarion; trans.J. W. Bolduc as Mathematics and Science: Last Essays, New York: Dover.
287. Pollock, J. L. 1967. –Mathematical Proof,— American Philosophical Quarterly 4, 238-44.
288. Popper, K [1934] 1959. Logik derForschung, Vienna: Julius Springer Verlag, 1935; trans. by the author as The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson.
289. Popper, K. 1963. –Science: Conjectures and Refutations,— in Conjectures and Refutations, New York: Harper & Row, 33-65.
290. Prior, A. N. 1960. –The Runabout Inference-Ticket,— Analysis 21, 38-9.
291. Proust, J. 1987. –Formal Logic as Transcendental in Wittgenstein and Carnap,— Nous 21, 500-20.
292. Putnam, H. 1963. –An Examination of Grünbaum's Philosophy of Space and Time,— in B. Baumrin (ed.), The Delaware Seminar in Philosophy of Science, New York: Interscience Publishers, 205-55, reprinted as –An Examination of Grünbaum's Philosophy of Geometry— in Putnam 1975,93–129.
293. Putnam, H. 1965.–Trial and Error Predicates and the Solution to a Problem of Mostowski,— Journal ofSymbolic Logic 30, 49-57.
294. Putnam, H. 1967. –Mathematics Without Foundations,— Journal ofPhilosophy 64, 5-22. Also in Putnam 1975, 43-59.
295. Putnam, H. 1973. –Explanation and Reference,— in G. Pearce and P. Maynard (eds.), Conceptual Change, Dordrecht: Reidel, 199-2 21.Also in Putnam 1975a, 196-214.
296. Putnam, H. 1974. –The Refutation of Conventionalism,— Nous 8, 25-40; revised version in Putnam 1975a, 153-91.
297. Putnam, H. 1975. Mathematics, Matter and Method, Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
298. Putnam, H. 1975a. Mind, Language and Reality, Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
299. Putnam, H. 1975b. –The Meaning of 'Meaning,'— in K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 131 -93. Also in Putnam 1975a, 215-71.
300. Putnam, H. 1978. Meaningand the Moral Sciences, London: Routledge.
301. Putnam, H. 1979. –Analyticity and Apriority: Beyond Wittgenstein and Quine,— in P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 423-41.Also in Putnam 1983, 98-114.
302. Putnam, H. 1980. –Models and Reality,— Journal of Symbolic Logic 45, 464-82. Also in Putnam 1983, 1 -24.
303. Putnam, H. 1981. Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
304. Putnam, H. 1983. Realism and Reason, Philosophical Papers, vol. 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
305. Putnam, H. 1994.–Rethinking Mathematical Necessity,— in Words and Life, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 245-63.
306. Putnam, H. 2004. Ethics without Ontology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
307. Quine, W. V. 1934. –Lectures on Carnap,— in Creath 1990, 47-103.
308. Quine, W. V. [1936] 1966.–Truth by Convention,— in O. H. Lee (ed.), Philosophical Essays for A.N. Whitehead, New York: Longmans, 90-124. Also in Quine 1966, 70-99.
309. Quine, W. V. 1937. –Is Logic a Matter of Words?— MS 102-61-05, Carnap Collection, Archives of Scientific Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh.
310. Quine, W. V. 1948. –On What There Is,— Review of Metaphysics 2, 21-38. Also in Quine 1953a, 1 -19.
311. Quine, W. V. 1951 –Two Dogmas of Empiricism,— Philosophical Review 60, 20-43. Also in Quine 1953a, 20-46.
312. Quine, W. V. 1951a. –Carnap's Views on Ontology,— Philosophical Studies 2, 65-72. Also in Quine 1966, 126-34.
313. Quine, W. V. 1953. –Mr. Strawson on Logical Theory,— Mind 62, 433-51. Also in Quine 1966, 135-55.
314. Quine, W. V. 1953a. From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
315. Quine, W. V. 1960. –Carnap and Logical Truth,— Synthese 12, 350-74. Also in Schilpp 1963, 385-406 and Quine 1966, 100-125.
316. Quine, W. V. 1960a. Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
317. Quine, W. V. 1963. –On Simple Theories of a Complex World,— Synthese 15, 107-111.Also in Quine 1966, 242-5.
318. Quine, W. V. 1964. –Necessary Truth,— in Quine 1966, 48-56.
319. Quine, W. V. 1964a. –Implicit Definition Sustained,— Journal of Philosophy 61, 7174. Also in Quine 1966, 195-8.
320. Quine, W. V. 1966. The Ways ofParadox, New York: Random House.
321. Quine, W. V. 1968. –Ontological Relativity,— Journal of Philosophy 65, 185-212. Also in Quine 1969, 26-68.
322. Quine, W. V. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press.
323. Quine, W. V. 1969a. –Epistemology Naturalized,— in Quine 1969, 69-89.
324. Quine, W. V. 1970. Philosophy ofLogic, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
325. Quine, W. V. 1970a. –On the Reasons for Indeterminacy of Translation,— Journal ofPhilosophy 67, 178-83.
326. Quine, W. V. 1975. –On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World,— Erkenntnis 9, 313-28.
327. Quine, W. V. 1981. Theories and Things, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
328. Quine, W. V. 1986. –Reply to Roger F. Gibson, Jr,— in Hahn and Schilpp 1986, 155-8.
329. Quine, W. V. 1990 –Three Indeterminacies,— in Barrett and Gibson 1990, 1 -16.
330. Quine, W. V. 1990a. –Comment on Hintikka,— in Barrett and Gibson 1990, 176-7.
331. Quine, W. V. 1991.–Two Dogmas in Retrospect,— Canadian Journal ofPhilosophy 21, 265-74.
332. Quine, W. V. 1992. Pursuit ofTruth, 2 nd ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
333. Quine, W. V. 1995. From Stimulus to Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
334. Quine, W. V. 1995a. –Reactions,— in Leonardi and Santambrogio 1995, 347-61.
335. Ramsey, F. P. 1931. The Foundation ofMathematics and OtherLogical Essays, London: Kegan Paul.
336. Reichenbach, H. [1920] 1965. Relativitatstheorie und Erkenntnis Apriori, Berlin: Springer; trans. M. Reichenbach as TheTheoryofRelativityandAPriori Knowledge, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
337. Reichenbach, H. [1922] 1978. Der gegenwartige Stand der Relativitatsdiskussion, Logos 10, 316-78; trans. M. Reichenbach as –The Present State ofthe Discussion on Relativity: A Critical Investigation,— in Hans Reichenbach; Selected Writings 1909—1953, vol. 2, ed. M. Reichenbach and R. Cohen, Dordrecht: Reidel,3-47.
338. Reichenbach, H. [1928] 1958. Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre, Berlin: de Gruyter; trans. M. Reichenbach and J. Freund as The Philosophy ofSpace and Time, New York: Dover.
339. Reichenbach, H. 1938. Experience and Prediction, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
340. Reichenbach, H. 1949. –The Philosophical Significance of the Theory of Relativity,— in Schilpp 1949, 287-312.
341. Reichenbach, H. 1971. The Direction ofTime, Berkeley: University of California Press.
342. Ricketts, T. G. 1985. –Frege, the Tractatus and the Logocentric Predicament,— Nous 19, 3-15.
343. Ricketts, T. G. 1994. –Carnap's Principle of Tolerance, Empiricism and Conventionalism,— in Clark and Hale 1994, 176-200.
344. Ricketts, T. G. 1996. –Carnap: From Logical Syntax to Semantics,— in Giere and Richardson 1996, 231 -50.
345. Riemann, B. G. F. 1868.–Überdie Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen,— in Abhandlungen der KUoniglichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu GoUttingen, 13; trans. W.K. Clifford as –On the Hypotheses which Lie at the Foundation of Geometry,— in Ewald 1996, vol. 2, 652-61.
346. Robinson, A. 1956. –On Beth's Test in the Theory of Definitions,— Journal of Symbolic Logic 21, 220-1.
347. Russell, B. 1897. An Essay on the Foundation of Geometry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
348. Russell, B. 1898. –Les axiomes propres a Euclide: sont-ils empiriques?— Revue de meetaphysique et de morale 6, 759-76.
349. Russell, B. 1899. –Sur les axiomes de la geeomeetrie,— Revue de meetaphysique et de morale 7, 684-707.
350. Russell, B. 1919. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin.
351. Ryckman, T. A. 1992. –P(oint) C(oincidence) Thinking: The Ironic Attachment of Logical Empiricism to General Relativity,— Studies in the History and Philosophy ofScience 23, 471 -97.
352. Ryckman, T. A. 1994.–Weyl, Reichenbach and the Epistemology of Geometry,— Studies in the History and Philosophy ofScience 25, 831 -70.
353. Ryckman, T. A. 1999.–World Geometries: Weyl and Eddington,— paper presented at the Bar-Hillel Colloquium for the History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, May 26, 1999.
354. Ryckman, T. A. 2005. The Reign ofRelativity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
355. Salmon, W. (ed.) 1979. Hans Reichenbach: Logical Empiricist, Dordrecht: Reidel.
356. Salmon, W. and Wolters G. (eds.) 1994. Language, Logic, and the Structure ofSci-entific Theories, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press; Konstanz: Univer-sitatsverlag.
357. Sarkar, S. 1992.–'The Boundless Ocean of Unlimited Possibilities': Logic in Car-nap's Logical Syntax of Language,— Synthese 93, 191-237.
358. Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) 1949. Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Library of Living Philosophers, La Salle, IL: Open Court.
359. Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) 1963. The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Library of Living Philosophers, La Salle, IL: Open Court.
360. Schlick, M. [1917] 1920. Raum und Zeit in der gegenwaUrtigen Physik, 3rd ed., Berlin: Springer; trans. H. L. Brose as Space and Time in Contemporary Physics, Oxford: Clarendon.
361. Schlick, M. [1925] 1974. AllgemeineErkenntnislehre, 3rd ed., Berlin:Julius Springer; trans. A. E. Blumberg as General Theory ofKnowledge, Vienna and New York: Springer.
362. Schlick, M. 1979. Philosophical Papers, ed. H. I. Mulder and B. F. B. van de Velde, trans. P. Heath, W. Sellars, H. Feigl, and M. Brodbeck, 2 vols., Dordrecht: Reidel.
363. Schrodinger, E. 1950. Space-Time Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
364. Shanker, S. G. 1987. Wittgenstein and the Turning-Point in the Philosophy ofMathe- matics, Albany: SUNYPress.
365. Shapiro, S. 1985. –Second-Order Languages and Mathematical Practice,— Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 714-42. Also in Shapiro 1996, 89-118.
366. Shapiro, S. (ed.) 1996. The Limits of Logic, Aldershot, England and Brookfield VT: Dartmouth.
367. Sher, G. 1996. –Did Tarski Commit 'Tarski's Fallacy'?— Journal of Symbolic Logic 61, 653-86.
368. Sher, G. 1998-9. –On the Possibility of a Substantive Theory of Truth,— Synthese 117,133-92.
369. Sieg, W. 2002. –Beyond Hilbert's Reach,— in Malament 2002, 363-405.
370. Sklar, L. 1974. Space, Time, and Spacetime, Berkeley: University of California Press.
371. Sklar, L. 1985. Philosophy and Spacetime Physics, Berkeley: University of California Press.
372. Skolem, Th. 1920. –Logische-kombinatorische Untersuchungen Über die Erfiillbarkeit und Beweisbarkeit mathematischer Satze nebst einem Theorem Über dichte Mengen,— in Skolem 1970, 103-36; trans. S. Bauer-Mengelberg as –Logico-combinatorial investigations in the satisfiability or provability of mathematical propositions: A simplified proof of a theorem by L. Lowenheim and generalizations of the theorem,— in van Heijenoort 1967, 254-63.
373. Skolem, Th. 1922. –Einige Bemerkungen zur axiomatischen Begrundung der Mengenlehre,— in Skolem 1970, 137-52; trans. S. Bauer-Mengelberg as –Some remarks on axiomatised set theory— in van Heijenoort 1967, 290-301.
374. Skolem, Th. 1929.–Über die Grundlagendiskussionen in der Mathematik,— in Skolem 1970, 207-25.
375. Skolem, Th. 1970. Selected Works in Logic, ed. J. E. Fenstad, Oslo: Universitetsfor-laget.
376. Smolin, L. 2001. Three Roads to Quantum Gravity, New York: Basic Books.
377. Sorabji, R. 2000. Emotion and Peace ofMind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
378. Stachel, J. 1989. –Einstein's Search for General Covariance,— in Howard and Stachel 1989, 63-100.
379. Stachel, J. 1994. –Changes in the Concepts of Space and Time Brought About by Relativity,— in Gould and Cohen 1994, 141 -62.
380. Stachel, J. 2002.–'The Relations between Things' versus 'The Things between Relations': The Deeper Meaning of the Hole Argument,— in Malament 2002, 231 -66.
381. Stachel, J. 2002a. Einstein from ‘B’ to ‘Z,’ Berlin: Birkhäuser.
382. Stachel,J. 2003.–A Brief History of Space-Time,— in Ciufolini etal. 2003, 15-34. Stadler, F. (ed.) 1993. Scientific Philosophy: Origins and Developments, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
383. Stein, H. 1977. –Some Philosophical Prehistory of General Relativity,— in J. Earman, C. Glymour, and J. Stachel (eds.) Foundations ofSpacetime Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3-49.
384. Stein, H. 1988.–Logos, Logic, and Logistikee: Some Philosophical Remarks on Nineteenth-Century Transformation of Mathematics,— in Aspray and Kitcher 1988,238-59.
385. Stein, H. 1992.–Was Carnap Entirely Wrong, After All?— Synthese 93, 275-95.
386. Steiner, M. 1996. –Wittgenstein: Mathematics, Regularities, Rules,— in A. Morton and S. P. Stich (eds.), Benacerraf and His Critics, Oxford: Blackwell, 190-212.
387. Steiner, M. 1998. The Applicability ofMathematics as a Philosophical Problem, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
388. Steiner, M. 2001. –Wittgenstein as His Own Worst Enemy: The Case of Gödel's Theorem,— Philosophia Mathematica (ser. 3) 9, 257-79.
389. Steiner, M. (2005). –Empirical Regularities in Wittgenstein,— unpublished manuscript.
390. Stroud, B. 1965. –Wittgenstein and Logical Necessity,— Philosophical Review 74, 504-18.
391. Stroud, B. 1969. –Conventionalism and the Indeterminacy of Translation,— in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (eds.), Words and Objections, Dordrecht: Reidel.
392. Synge, J. L. 1960. Relativity: The General Theory, Amsterdam: North Holland.
393. Tarski, A. 1940. –The Completeness of Elementary Algebra and Geometry,— in Tarski 1986, vol. 4, 289-346.
394. Tarski, A. 1951. A Decision Method for Elementary Algebra and Geometry, Berkeley: University of California Press.
395. Tarski, A. 1956. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
396. Tarski, A. 1986. Collected Papers, ed. S. R. Givant and R. N. McKenzie, Basel: Birkhauser.
397. Tharp, L H 1975 –Which Logic Is the Right Logic?— Synthese 31, 1 -21 Also in Shapiro 1996, 47-68.
398. Thorne, K. S. 1996. Black Holes and Time Warps, New York: W.W. Norton.
399. Thorne, K S., Lee D. L., and Lightman, A. P. 1973. –Foundations for a Theory of Gravitation Theories,— Physical Review D7 3563-78.
400. Torretti, R. 1978. Philosophy of Geometry from Riemann to Poincare,Dordrecht: Reidel.
401. Torretti, R. [1983] 1996. Relativity and Geometry, 1st ed., Oxford: Pergamon; 2nd ed., New York: Dover.
402. Trautman, A. 1980. –Fiber Bundles, Gauge Fields, and Gravitation,— in Held 1980, vol. 1, 287-308.
403. Tymoczko, T. 1989. –In Defense of Putnam's Brains,— Philosophical Studies 57, 281-97.
404. Van Fraassen, B. C. 1997. –Putnam's Paradox: Metaphysical Realism Revamped and Evaded,— inJ. E. Tomberlin (ed.), Mind, Causation and World, Philosophical Perspectives, 11, Oxford: Blackwell, 17-42.
405. Van Heijenoort, J. (ed.) 1967. From Frege to Gödel, A Source Book in Mathematical Logic 1879—1931, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
406. Veblen, O. 1904.–ASystem of Axioms for Geometry,— Transactions ofthe American Mathematical Society 5, 343-84.
407. Veronese, G. 1894. GrundzuUge der Geometrie, Leipzig: B. G. Trubner.
408. VonWright G. H. 1971. Explanation and Understanding, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
409. Waismann, F. 1979. Ludwig Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle, ed. B. McGuinness; tr. J. Schulte and B. McGuinness, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
410. Wang, H. 1970.–A Survey of Skolem's Work in Logic,— in Skolem 1970, 17-52.
411. Weinberg, S. 1972. Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory ofRelativity, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
412. Weinberg, S. 2001. –Can Science Explain Everything? Anything?— New York Review ofBooks, vol. 48, no. 9.
413. Weingard, R. and Smith, G. 1986. –Critical Notice: Michael Friedman's Foundations of Space-Time Theories,— Philosophy of Science 53, 286-99.
414. Weyl, H. [1921] 1952. Raum-Zeit-Materie, 4th ed., Berlin: Springer; trans. H. L. Brose as Space-Time-Matter, London: Methuen; New York: Dover.
415. Weyl, H. 1922. –Die Relativitatstheorie auf der Naturforscherversammlung in Bad Nauheim,— Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 31, 51 -63.
416. Wheeler, J. A. 1962. Geometrodynamics, New York: Academic Press.
417. Whitely, C. I. 1936.–Truth by Convention: A Symposium,— Analysis 4, 22-28.
418. Wiener, O. 1890. –Stehende Lichtwellen und die Schwingungsrichtung polar- isierten Lichtes,— Wiedemann s Annalen 40, 203-13.
419. Will, C. M. 1979. –The Confrontation between Gravitation Theory and Experiment,— in Hawking and Israel 1979, 24-89.
420. Will, C. M. 1993. Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics, rev. ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
421. Wittgenstein,L. [1921] 1961. –Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung,— Annalender Naturphilosophie 14, 184-262; trans. C. K. Ogden and F.P. Ramsey as Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1922; trans. D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
422. Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations (PI); trans. G.E.M. Anscombe, ed. G.E.M. Anscombe and R. Rhees, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
423. Wittgenstein, L. [1956] 1978. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics (RFM), ed. G. H. von Wright, R. Rhees, and G. E. M. Anscombe; trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 3rd rev. edition 1978.
424. Wittgenstein, L. 1961. Notebooks 1914—16, ed. G. H. von Wright and G. E. M. Anscombe, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
425. Wittgenstein, L. 1974. Philosophical Grammar (PG), ed. R. Rhees; trans. A. Kenny, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
426. Wittgenstein, L. 1976. Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics (LFM), ed. C. Diamond, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
427. Wittgenstein, L. 1977. On Certainty, ed. G.E.H. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright; trans. D. Paul and G.E.M. Anscombe, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
428. Wittgenstein, L. 1979. Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough, ed. R. Rhees, Retford: Brynmill. Also in Wittgenstein 1993, 119-55.
429. Wittgenstein, L. 1979a. Wittgenstein's Lectures, Cambridge, 1932—1935, ed. A. Ambrose, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
430. Wittgenstein, L. 1980. Culture and Value; trans. P. Winch, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
431. Wittgenstein, L. 1993. Philosophical Occasions (PO), ed. J. Klagge and A. Nord- mann, Indianapolis: Hackett.
432. Wittgenstein, L. 1993a. –Philosophy,— in Wittgenstein 1993, 160-99.
433. Wittgenstein, L. 1993b. –Notes for the 'Philosophical Lecture,'— in Wittgenstein 1993,447-58.
434. Wright, C. 1980. Wittgenstein on the Foundations of Mathematics, London: Duckworth.
435. Zahar, E. G. 1997. –Poincare's Philosophy of Geometry, or Does Geometric Conventionalism Deserve its Name?— Studies in the History and Philosophy ofModern Physics 28, 183-218.
436. Zahar, E. G. 2001. Poincaree s Philosophy, Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.