The effect of patient age on bone formation using a fully synthetic nanocrystalline bone augmentation material in maxillary sinus grafting

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 976-983

  Wolf, Michael ^a   Wurm, Alexander ^a   Heinemann, Friedhelm ^b   Gerber, Thomas ^c   Reichert, Christoph ^a   Jäger, Andreas ^a   Götz, Werner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Age; Bone augmentation; Bone formation

Indexed keywords

BONE PROSTHESIS; DRUG COMBINATION; HYDROXYAPATITE; SILICON DIOXIDE; SYNTHETIC BONE GRAFT;

ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; ADULT; AGE; AGED; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE PROSTHESIS; DRUG COMBINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MAXILLARY SINUS; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL SURGERY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; WOUND HEALING;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; BONE SUBSTITUTES; DRUG COMBINATIONS; DURAPATITE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAXILLARY SINUS; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES, PREPROSTHETIC; OSTEOGENESIS; SILICON DIOXIDE; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84921980739     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3525     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Nkenke E, Stelzle F. Clinical outcomes of sinus floor augmentation for implant placement using autogenous bone or bone substitutes: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(suppl 4):124-133.
2. Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30:207-229.
3. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:613-616.
4. Stern A, Green J. Sinus lift procedures: An overview of current techniques. Dent Clin North Am 2012;56:219-233.
5. Del Fabbro M, Corbella S, Weinstein T, Ceresoli V, Taschieri S. Implant survival rates after osteotome-mediated maxillary sinus augmentation: A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14(suppl 1):e159-e168.
6. Rickert D, Slater JJ, Meijer HJ, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Maxillary sinus lift with solely autogenous bone compared to a combination of autogenous bone and growth factors or (solely) bone substitutes. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:160-167.
7. Jiang SY, Shu R, Xie YF, Zhang SY. Age-related changes in biological characteristics of human alveolar osteoblasts. Cell Prolif 2010; 43:464-470.
8. Yildirim M, Spiekermann H, Handt S, Edelhoff D. Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: A histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:23-33.
9. Valentini P, Abensur DJ. Maxillary sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone: A clinical report of long-term results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:556-560.
10. Kolerman R, Tal H, Moses O. Histomorphometric analysis of newly formed bone after maxillary sinus floor augmentation using ground cortical bone allograft and internal collagen membrane. J Periodontol 2008;79:2104-2111.
11. Kolerman R, Goshen G, Joseph N, Kozlovsky A, Shetty S, Tal H. Histomorphometric analysis of maxillary sinus augmentation using an alloplast bone substitute. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:1835-1843.
12. Guiglia R, Musciotto A, Compilato D, et al. Aging and oral health: Effects in hard and soft tissues. Curr Pharm Des 2010;16:619-630.
13. Patil MS, Patil SB. Geriatric patient-Psychological and emotional considerations during dental treatment. Gerodontology 2009; 26:72-77.
14. Al Jabbari Y, Nagy WW, Iacopino AM. Implant dentistry for geriatric patients: A review of the literature. Quintessence Int 2003; 34:281-285.
15. Engeland CG, Bosch JA, Cacioppo JT, Marucha PT. Mucosal wound healing: The roles of age and sex. Arch Surg 2006;141:1193-1197.
16. Boskey AL, Coleman R. Aging and bone. J Dent Res 2010:89:1333-1348.
17. Browaeys H, Bouvry P, De Bruyn H. A literature review on biomaterials in sinus augmentation procedures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007; 9:166-177.
18. Gerike W, Bienengraber V, Henkel KO, et al. The manufacture of synthetic non-sintered and degradable bone grafting substitutes. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2006;65:54-55.
19. Tonetti MS, Hammerle CH; European Workshop on Periodontology Group C. Advances in bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:168-172.
20. Zhang W, Wang X, Wang S, et al. The use of injectable sonication-induced silk hydrogel for VEGF(165) and BMP-2 delivery for elevation of the maxillary sinus floor. Biomaterials 2011;32:9415-9424.
21. Kolk A, Handschel J, Drescher W, et al. Current trends and future perspectives of bone substitute materials-From space holders to innovative biomaterials. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012;40:706-718.
22. Abshagen K, Schrodi I, Gerber T, Vollmar B. In vivo analysis of biocompatibility and vascularization of the synthetic bone grafting substitute NanoBone. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;91:557-566.
23. Ghanaati S, Barbeck M, Willershausen I, et al. Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute leads to sufficient bone tissue formation already after 3 months: Histological and histomorphometrical analysis 3 and 6 months following human sinus cavity augmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012:15(16):883-892.
24. Stubinger S, Ghanaati S, Orth C, et al. Maxillary sinus grafting with a nano-structured biomaterial: Preliminary clinical and histological results. Eur Surg Res 2009;42:143-149.
25. Xu W, Holzhuter G, Sorg H, et al. Early matrix change of a nanostructured bone grafting substitute in the rat. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;91:692-699.
26. Punke C, Zehlicke T, Boltze C, Pau HW. Experimental studies on a new highly porous hydroxyapatite matrix for obliterating open mastoid cavities. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:807-811.
27. Moller B, Acil Y, Birkenfeld F, Behrens E, Terheyden H, Wiltfang J. Highly porous hydroxyapatite with and without local harvested bone in sinus floor augmentation: A histometric study in pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013 April 9. doi:10.1111/clr.12161. [Epub ahead of print].
28. Heinemann F, Mundt T, Biffar R, Gedrange T, Goetz W. A 3-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed simultaneously with maxillary sinus floor augmentations using a new nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite. J Physiol Pharmacol 2009;60(suppl 8):91-97.
29. Wolf M, Lossdorfer S, Abuduwali N, et al. Effect of intermittent PTH (1-34) on human periodontal ligament cells transplanted into immunocompromised mice. Tissue Eng Part A 2012;18:1849-1856.
30. Wolf M, Lossdörfer S, Küpper K, Jäger A. Regulation of high mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) expression following mechanical loading by orthodontic forces in vitro and in vivo. Eur J Orthod 2013:74:420-434.
31. Wolf M, Jäger A, Abuduwali N, Gotz W, Lossdorfer S. Continuous PTH modulates alkaline phosphatase activity in human PDL cells via protein kinase C dependent pathways in vitro. Ann Anat 2013:195:455-460.
32. Barka T, Anderson P. Histochemical methods for acid phosphatase using hexazonium as a coupler. J Histochem Cytochem 1962; 10:741-753.
33. Wolf M, Lossdorfer S, Abuduwali N, Jäger A. Potential role of high mobility group box protein 1 and intermittent PTH (1-34) in periodontal tissue repair following orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Clin Oral Investig 2012;17:989-997.
34. Bienengraber V, Gerber T, Henkel KO, Bayerlein T, Proff P, Gedrange T. The clinical application of a new synthetic bone grafting material in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2006; 65:84-88.
35. Nissan J, Marilena V, Gross O, Mardinger O, Chaushu G. Histomorphometric analysis following augmentation of the anterior atrophic maxilla with cancellous bone block allograft. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:84-89.
36. Ohgushi H, Okumura M, Yoshikawa T, et al. Bone formation process in porous calcium carbonate and hydroxyapatite. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:885-895.
37. Lindhe J, Cecchinato D, Bressan EA, Toia M, Araujo MG, Liljenberg B. The alveolar process of the edentulous maxilla in periodontitis and non-periodontitis subjects. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:5-11.
38. Ulm C, Kneissel M, Schedle A, et al. Characteristic features of trabecular bone in edentulous maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10:459-467.
39. Gapski R, Satheesh K, Cobb CM. Histomorphometric analysis of bone density in the maxillary tuberosity of cadavers: A pilot study. J Periodontol 2006;77:1085-1090.
40. Kassolis JD, Scheper M, Jham B, Reynolds MA. Histopathologic findings in bone from edentulous alveolar ridges: A role in osteonecrosis of the jaws? Bone 2010;47:127-130.
41. Jakob F, Ebert R, Rudert M, et al. In situ guided tissue regeneration in musculoskeletal diseases and aging: Implementing pathology into tailored tissue engineering strategies. Cell Tissue Res 2012; 347:725-735.
42. Han J, Okada H, Takai H, Nakayama Y, Maeda T, Ogata Y. Collection and culture of alveolar bone marrow multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells from older individuals. J Cell Biochem 2009; 107:1198-1204.
43. Diz P, Scully C, Sanz M. Dental implants in the medically compromised patient. J Dent 2013;41:195-206.
44. Gotz W, Gerber T, Michel B, Lossdorfer S, Henkel KO, Heinemann F. Immunohistochemical characterization of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite silica gel (NanoBone) osteogenesis: A study on biopsies from human jaws. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1016-1026.
45. Henkel KO, Gerber T, Lenz S, Gundlach KK, Bienengraber V. Macroscopical, histological, and morphometric studies of porous bone-replacement materials in minipigs 8 months after implantation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102:606-613.
46. Gotz W, Lenz S, Reichert C, et al. A preliminary study in osteoinduction by a nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite in the mini pig. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2010;48:589-596.
47. Ghanaati S, Orth C, Barbeck M, et al. Histological and histomorphometrical analysis of a silica matrix embedded nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute using the subcutaneous implantation model in Wistar rats. Biomed Mater 2010 May 11;5:035005.
48. Reichert C, Gotz W, Reimann S, et al. Resorption behavior of a nanostructured bone substitute: In vitro investigation and clinical application. J Orofac Orthop 2013;74:165-174.