Mitigation of climate change with biomass harvesting in Norway spruce stands: Are harvesting practices carbon neutral?

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 217-225

  Mäkipää, Raisa ^a   Linkosalo, Tapio ^a   Komarov, Alexander ^b   Mäkelä, Annikki ^c  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b INSTITUTE OF PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROBLEMS IN SOIL SCIENCE   (Russian Federation)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bioenergy; Carbon sequestration; Climate change; Nitrogen balance; Whole tree harvesting

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CARBON; CLIMATE MODELS; COMBUSTION; ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; FOSSIL FUELS; HARVESTING; NEEDLES; NITROGEN; SOIL MOISTURE;

BIO-ENERGY; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; FOREST CARBON SEQUESTRATION; NITROGEN BALANCE; NITROGEN MINERALIZATION; ORGANIC MATTER DECOMPOSITION; SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION; WHOLE TREE HARVESTING;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

BIOMASS; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMBUSTION; CONIFEROUS TREE; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY PLANNING; FORESTRY PRODUCTION; FOSSIL FUEL; MITIGATION; SOIL CARBON;

PICEA ABIES;

EID: 84921969822     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: 12086037     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0120     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ågren, G.I. 1985. Theory for growth of plants derived from the nitrogen productivity concept. Physiol. Plant. 64(1): 17-28. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb01207.x.
2. Alakangas, E. 2000. Suomessa käytettyjen polttoaineiden ominaisuuksia. VTT Tied. 2045: 1-172.
3. Alam, A., Kellomäki, S., Kilpeläinen, A., and Strandman, H. 2013. Effects of stump extraction on the carbon sequestration in Norway spruce forest ecosystems under varying thinning regimes with implications for fossil fuel substitution. GCB Bioenergy, 5(4): 445-458. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12010.
4. Bergh, J., Freeman, M., Sigurdsson, B., Kellomäki, S., Laitinen, K., Niinistö, S., Peltola, H., and Linder, S. 2003. Modelling the short-term effects of climate change on the productivity of selected tree species in Nordic countries. For. Ecol. Manage. 183(1-3): 327-340. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00117-8.
5. Brunner, A., and Kimmins, J.P. 2003. Nitrogen fixation in coarse woody debris of Thuja plicata and Tsuga heterophylla forests on northern Vancouver Island. Can. J. For. Res. 33(9): 1670-1682. doi:10.1139/x03-085.
6. Cao, T., Valsta, L., and Mäkelä, A. 2010.AcomparisonofcarbonassessmentmethodsforoptimizingtimberproductionandcarbonsequestrationinScotspinestands.For.Ecol.Manage.260:1726-1734.doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.053.
7. Chen, H., and Hicks, W. 2003. High asymbiotic N2 fixation rates in woody roots after six years of decomposition: controls and implications. Basic Appl. Ecol. 4(5): 479-486. doi:10.1078/1439-1791-00190.
8. Chertov, O.G., Komarov, A.S., Nadporozhskaya, M., Bykhovets, S.S., and Zudin, S.L. 2001. ROMUL—a model of forest soil organic matter dynamics as a substantial tool for forest ecosystem modeling. Ecol. Model. 138: 289-308. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00409-9.
9. Chertov, O.G., Bykhovets, S.S., Nadporozhkaya, M.A., Komarov, A.S., and Larionova, A.A. 2007. Evaluation of the rates of transformation of soil organic matter in the ROMUL model [in Russian]. In Modelling of organic matter dynamics in forest ecosystems [in Russian]. Edited by V.N. Kudeyarov. Moscow Hayka, Moscow. pp. 83-99.
10. Chertov, O., Bhatti, J.S., Komarov, A., Mikhailov, A., and Bykhovets, S. 2009. Influence of climate change, fire and harvest on the carbon dynamics of black spruce in central Canada. For. Ecol. Manage. 257(3): 941-950. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.10.038.
11. Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell, J., Chhabra, A., DeFries, R., Galloway, J., Heimann, M., Jones, C., Le Quéré, C., Myneni, R.B., Piao, S., and Thornton, P. 2013. Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the 5th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Edited by T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, U.S.A.
12. Demirbas, A. 2005. Potential applications of renewable energy sources, biomass combustion problems in boiler power systems and combustion related environmental issues. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 31(2): 171-192. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2005.02.002.
13. Egnell, G., and Lejon, B. 1999. Survival and growth of planted seedlings of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies after different levels of biomass removal in clear felling. Scand. J. For. Res. 14: 303-313.
14. Garcia-Gonzalo, J, Peltola, H., Briceno-Elizondo, E., and Kellomäki, S. 2007. Changed thinning regimes may increase carbon stock under climate change: a case study from a Finnish boreal forest. Clim. Change, 81: 431-454. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9149-8.
15. Ge, Z.-M., Kellomäki, S., Peltola, H., Zhou, X., Väisänen, H., and Strandman, H. 2013. Impacts of climate change on primary production and carbon sequestration of boreal Norway spruce forests: Finland as a model. Clim. Change, 118(2): 259-273. doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0607-1.
16. Haberl, H., Sprinz, D., Bonazountas, M., Cocco, P., Desaubies, Y., Henze, M., Hertel, O., Johnson, R.K., Kastrup, U., Laconte, P., Lange, E., Novak, P., Paavola, J., Reenberg, A., van den Hove, S., Vermeire, T., Wadhams, P., and Searchinger, T. 2012. Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy. Energy Policy, 45: 18-23. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.051.
17. Helmisaari, H.-S., Derome, J., Nöjd, P., and Kukkola, M. 2007. Fine root biomass in relation to site and stand characteristics in Norway spruce and Scots pine stands. Tree Physiol. 27(10): 1493-1504. doi:10.1093/treephys/27.10.1493.
18. Helmisaari, H.-S., Hanssen, K.H., Jacobson, S., Kukkola, M., Luiro, J., Saarsalmi, A., Tamminen, P., and Tveite, B. 2011. Logging residue removal after thinning in Nordic boreal forests: long-term impact on tree growth. For. Ecol. Manage. 261(11): 1919-1927. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.02.015.
19. Hotanen, J.-P., Nousiainen, H., Mäkipää, R., Reinikainen, A., and Tonteri, T. 2008. Metsätyypit — opas kasvupaikkojen luokitteluun. Metsäkustannus. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2003. Report on good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry.
20. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2006a. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Vol. 2. Energy IGES, Japan. Available from www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html.
21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2006b. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Vol. 4. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. IGES, Japan. Available from www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html.
22. Jacobson, S., Kukkola, M., Mälkönen, E., and Tveite, B. 2000. Impact of wholetree harvesting and compensatory fertilization on growth of coniferous thinning stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 129: 41-51. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00159-0.
23. Johnson, D.W., and Curtis, P.S. 2001. Effects of forest management on soil C and N storage: meta-analysis. For. Ecol. Manage. 140(2-3): 227-238. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00282-6.
24. Johnson, D.W., Knoepp, J.D., Swank, W.T., Shan, J., Morris, L.A., Van Lear, D.H., and Kapeluck, P.R. 2002. Effects of forest management on soil carbon: results of some long-term resampling studies. Environ. Pollut. 116: S201-S208. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00252-4.
25. Jones, C., McConnell, C., Coleman, K., Cox, P., Falloon, P., Jenkinson, D., and Powlson, D. 2005. Global climate change and soil carbon stocks: predictions from two contrasting models for the turnover of organic carbon in soil. Glob. Chang. Biol. 11(1): 154-166. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00885.x.
26. Jylhä, K., Ruosteenoja, K., Räisänen, J., Venäläinen, A., Tuomenvirta, H., Ruokolainen, L., Saku, S., and Seitola, S. 2009. Arvioita Suomen muuttuvasta ilmastosta sopeutumis-tutkimuksia varten. ACCLIM-hankkeen raportti. Ilmatieteen laitos, Raportteja 2009(4) [in Finnish].
27. Kantola, A., Mäkinen, H., and Mäkelä, A. 2007. Stem form and branchiness of Norway spruce as a sawn timber — predicted by a process based model. For. Ecol. Manage. 241(1-3): 209-222. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.013.
28. Komarov, A.S. 2007. Monte Carlo method at the analysis of forest ecosystem dynamics, sources of uncertainties and applicability limits of the model. In Modelling of organic matter dynamics in forest ecosystems. Edited by V.N. Kudeyarov. Moscow Hayka, Moscow. pp. 162-174. [in Russian.]
29. Larocque, G.R., Bhatti, J.S., Boutin, R., and Chertov, O. 2008. Uncertainty analysis in carbon cycle models of forest ecosystems: research needs and development of a theoretical framework to estimate error propagation. Ecol. Model. 219(3-4): 400-412. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.024.
30. Lindholm, E.L., Berg, S., and Hansson, P.A. 2010.Energyefficiencyandtheenvironmentalimpactofharvestingstumpsandloggingresidues.Eur.J.For.Res.129(6):1223-1235.doi:10.1007/s10342-010-0412-1.
31. Lindholm, E.-L., Stendahl, J., Berg, S., and Hansson, P.-A. 2011. Greenhouse gas balance of harvesting stumps and logging residues for energy in Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res. 26(6): 586-594. doi:10.1080/02827581.2011.615337.
32. Linkosalo, T., Kolari, P., and Pumpanen, J. 2013. New decomposition rate functions based on volumetric soil water content for the ROMUL soil organic matter dynamics model. Ecol. Model. 263: 109-118. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.04.026.
33. Mäkelä, A. 1997. A carbon balance model of growth and self-pruning in trees based on structural relationships. For. Sci. 43(1): 7-24.
34. Mäkelä, A. 2002. Derivation of stem taper from the pipe theory in a carbon balance framework. Tree Physiol. 22(13): 891-905. doi:10.1093/treephys/22.13.891.
35. Mäkelä, A., and Mäkinen, H. 2003. Generating 3D sawlogs with a process-based growth model. For. Ecol. Manage. 184(1-3): 337. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00152-X.
36. Mäkelä, A., Pulkkinen, M., Kolari, P., Lagergren, F., Berbigier, B., Lindroth, A., Loustau, D., Nikinmaa, E., Vesala, T., and Hari, P. 2008a. Developing an empirical model of stand GPP with the LUE approach: analysis of eddy covariance data at five contrasting conifer sites in Europe. Glob. Chang. Biol. 14: 92-108. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01463.x.
37. Mäkelä, A., Valentine, H.T., and Helmisaari, H.-S. 2008b. Optimal co-allocation of carbon and nitrogen in a forest stand at steady state. New Phytol. 180(1): 114-123. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02558.x.
38. Mäkipää, R., Linkosalo, T., Niinimäki, S., Komarov, A., Bykhovets, S., Tahvonen, O., and Mäkelä, A. 2011. How forest management and climate change affect the carbon sequestration of a Norway spruce stand. J. Forest Planning, 16: 107-120.
39. McMurtrie, R.E. 1991. Relationship of forest productivity to nutrient and carbon supply—a modeling analysis. Tree Physiol. 9(1-2): 87-99. doi:10.1093/treephys/9.1-2.87.
40. McMurtrie, R.E., and Dewar, R.C. 2011. Leaf-trait variation explained by the hypothesis that plants maximize their canopy carbon export over the lifespan of leaves. Tree Physiol. 31(9): 1007-1023. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpr037.
41. Merilä, P., Mustajärvi, K., Helmisaari, H.-S., Hilli, S., Lindroos, A.-J., Nieminen, T.M., Nöjd, P., Rautio, P., Salemaa, M., and Ukonmaanaho, L. 2014. Above-and belowground N stocks in coniferous boreal forests in Finland: implications for sustainability of more intensive biomass utilization. For. Ecol. Manage. 311: 17-28. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.029.
42. Niinimäki, S., Tahvonen, O., and Mäkelä, A. 2012. Applying a process-based model in Norway spruce management. For. Ecol. Manage. 265: 102-115. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.023.
43. Niinimäki, S., Tahvonen, O., Mäkelä, A., and Linkosalo, T. 2013. On the economics of Norway spruce stands and carbon storage. Can. J. For. Res. 43(7): 637-648. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2012-0516.
44. Palosuo, T., Peltoniemi, M., Mikhailov, A., Komarov, A., Faubert, P., Thürig, E., and Lindner, M. 2008. Projecting effects of intensified biomass extraction with alternative modelling approaches. For. Ecol. Manage. 255: 1423-1433. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.057.
45. Palosuo, T., Foereid, B., Svensson, M., Shurpali, N., Lehtonen, A., Herbst, M., Linkosalo, T., Ortiz, C., Rampazzo Todorovic, G., Marcinkonis, S., Li, C., and Jandl, R. 2012. A multi-model comparison of soil carbon assessment of a coniferous forest stand. Environmental Modelling & Software, 35: 38-49. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.02.004.
46. Pingoud, K., Cowie, A., Bird, N., Gustavsson, L., Rüter, S., Sathre, R., Soimakallio, S., Türk, A., and Woess-Gallasch, S. 2010.Bioenergy:countingonincentives.Science,327(5970):1199-1200.doi:10.1126/science.327.5970.1199-b.
47. Pohjola, J., Kerkelä, L., and Mäkipää, R. 2003. Credited forest carbon sinks: how the costs reduction is allocated among countries and sectors. Climate Policy, 3: 445-461. doi:10.1016/j.clipol.2003.07.001.
48. Repo, A., Känkänen, R., Tuovinen, J.-P., Antikainen, R., Tuomi, M., Vanhala, P., and Liski, J. 2012. Forest bioenergy climate impact can be improved by allocating forest residue removal. GCB Bioenergy, 4(2): 202-212. doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01124.x.
49. Rolff, C., and Ågren, G.I. 1999. Predicting effects of different harvesting intensities with a model of nitrogen limited forest growth. Ecol. Model. 118(2-3): 193-211. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00043-5.
50. Shanin, V.N., Komarov, A., Mikhailov, A.V., and Bykhovets, S. 2011. Modelling carbon and nitrogen dynamics in forest ecosystems in Central Russia under different climate change scenarios and forest management regimes. Ecol. Model. 222: 2262-2275. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.11.009.
51. Shanin, V., Komarov, A., Khoraskina, Y., Bykhovets, S., Linkosalo, T., and Mäkipää, R. 2013. Carbon turnover in mixed stands: modelling possible shifts under climate change. Ecol. Model. 251: 232-245. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.12.015.
52. Shaw, C., Chertov, O., Komarov, A., Bhatti, J., Nadporozskaya, M., Apps, M., Bykhovets, S., and Mikhailov, A. 2006. Application of the forest ecosystem model EFIMOD 2 to jack pine along the Boreal Forest Transect Case Study. Can. J. Soil Sci. 86(Special Issue): 171-185. doi:10.4141/S05-079.
53. Smolander, A., Kitunen, V., Tamminen, P., and Kukkola, M. 2010.RemovalofloggingresidueinNorwaysprucethinningstands:long-termchangesinorganiclayerproperties.SoilBiol.Biochem.42(8):1222-1228.doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.015.
54. Strengbom, J., Näsholm, T., and Ericson, L. 2004. Light, not nitrogen, limits growth of the grass Deschampsia flexuosa in boreal forests. Can. J. Bot. 82(4): 430-435. doi:10.1139/b04-017.
55. Strömgren, M., Egnell, G., and Olsson, B.A. 2013. Carbon stocks in four forest stands in Sweden 25 years after harvesting of slash and stumps. For. Ecol. Manage. 290: 59-66. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.052.
56. Tamminen, P., Saarsalmi, A., Smolander, A., Kukkola, M., and Helmisaari, H.-S. 2012. Effects of logging residue harvest in thinnings on amounts of soil carbon and nutrients in Scots pine and Norway spruce stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 263: 31-38. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.09.015.
57. TAPIO. 2007. Hyvän metsänhoidon suositukset Metsätalouden kehittämiskeskus Tapio.
58. Thiffault, E., Hannam, K.D., Paré, D., Titus, B.D., Hazlett, P.W., Maynard, D.G., and Brais, S. 2011. Effects of forest biomass harvesting on soil productivity in boreal and temperate forests — a review. Environ. Rev. 19: 278-309. doi:10.1139/a11-009.
59. Ukonmaanaho, L., Merilä, P., Nöjd, P., and Nieminen, T.M. 2008. Litterfall production and nutrient return to the forest floor in Scots pine and Norway spruce stands in Finland. Boreal Environ. Res. 13(Suppl. B): 67-91.
60. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2011. Conference of the Parties (COP 17). 2/CMP. 7 Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol. Available from http://unfccc.int/meetings/durban_nov_2011/meeting/6245/php/view/decisions.php.
61. Valentine, H.T., and Mäkelä, A. 2012. Modeling forest stand dynamics from optimal balances of carbon and nitrogen. New Phytol. 194(4): 961-971. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04123.x.
62. Vanhala, P., Repo, A., and Liski, J. 2013. Forest bioenergy at the cost of carbon sequestration? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5(1): 41-46. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.015.
63. Venäläinen, A., Tuomenvirta, H., and Drebs, A. 2005. A basic Finnish climate data set 1961-2000 — description and illustrations. Finnish Meteorol. Inst. Rep. 2005(5).
64. Wall, A. 2008. Effect of removal of logging residue on nutrient leaching and nutrient pools in the soil after clearcutting in a Norway spruce stand. For. Ecol. Manage. 256(6): 1372-1383. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.044.
65. Wall, A., and Hytönen, J. 2011. The long-term effects of logging residue removal on forest floor nutrient capital, foliar chemistry and growth of a Norway spruce stand. Biomass Bioenergy, 35(8): 3328-3334. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.063.
66. Wihersaari, M. 2005. Greenhouse gas emissions from final harvest fuel chip productioninFinland. BiomassBioenergy,28:435-443.doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.11.007.
67. Zabowski, D., Chambreau, D., Rotramel, N., and Thies, W.G. 2008. Long-term effects of stump removal to control root rot on forest soil bulk density, soil carbon and nitrogen content. For. Ecol. Manage. 255(3-4): 720-727. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.046.