Literary authorship attribution with phrase-structure fragments

Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature, CLfL 2012 - Co-located with the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2012 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 59-63

  van Cranenburgh, Andreas ^a  

^a Huygens Institute KNAW   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY;

AUTHORSHIP ATTRIBUTION; FUNCTION WORDS; HIERARCHICAL INFORMATION; KERNEL-METHODS; PHRASE STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL INFORMATION; STYLOMETRY; TREE KERNELS; TRIGRAM MODEL;

TREES (MATHEMATICS);

EID: 84921926067     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Harold Baayen, H. Van Halteren, and F. Tweedie. 1996. Outside the cave of shadows: Using syntactic annotation to enhance authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing, pages 121-132.
2. Michael Collins and Nigel Duffy. 2002. New ranking algorithms for parsing and tagging: Kernels over discrete structures, and the voted perceptron. In Proceedings of ACL.
3. Michael Gamon. 2004. Linguistic correlates of style: authorship classification with deep linguistic analysis features. In Proceedings of COLING.
4. Jack Grieve. 2007. Quantitative authorship attribution: An evaluation of techniques. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 22(3):251-270. URL http://llc.oxfordjournals.org/content/22/3/251.abstract.
5. Graeme Hirst and Olga Feiguina. 2007. Bi-grams of syntactic labels for authorship discrimination of short texts. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 22(4):405-417. URL http://llc.oxfordjournals.org/content/22/4/405.abstract.
6. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proc. of ACL, volume 1, pages 423-430.
7. Mitchell P. Marcus, Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz, and Beatrice Santorini. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
8. Rohith K Menon and Yejin Choi. 2011. Domain independent authorship attribution without domain adaptation. In Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, pages 309-315.
9. Alessandro Moschitti. 2006. Making tree kernels practical for natural language learning. In Proceedings of EACL, pages 113-120. URL http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/E/E06/E06-1015.pdf.
10. Sindhu Raghavan, Adriana Kovashka, and Raymond Mooney. 2010. Authorship attribution using probabilistic context-free grammars. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 38-42.
11. Federico Sangati, Willem Zuidema, and Rens Bod. 2010. Efficiently extract recurring tree fragments from large treebanks. In Proceedings of LREC, pages 219-226. URL http://dare.uva.nl/record/371504.
12. Remko Scha. 1990. Language theory and language technology; competence and performance. In Q.A.M. de Kort and G.L.J. Leerdam, editors, Computertoepassingen in de Neerlandistiek, pages 7-22. LVVN, Almere, the Netherlands. Original title: Taaltheorie en taaltechnologie; competence en performance. Translation available at http://iaaa.nl/rs/LeerdamE.html.
13. Efstathios Stamatatos. 2009. A survey of modern authorship attribution methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3):538-556. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21001.
14. Wybo Wiersma, John Nerbonne, and Timo Lauttamus. 2011. Automatically extracting typical syntactic differences from corpora. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 26(1):107-124. URL http://llc.oxfordjournals.org/content/26/1/107.abstract.