High-efficient mercury removal from environmental water samples using di-thio grafted on magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 2155-2165

  Mehdinia, Ali ^a   Akbari, Maryam ^b   Baradaran Kayyal, Tohid ^b   Azad, Mohammad ^b  

^a IRANIAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCEANOGRAPHY AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE   (Iran)

^b K N TOOSI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Dithiocarbamate functionalization; Magnetic nanoparticles; Mercury removal; Mesoporous silica; Water samples

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; CARBAMATE (ESTER); LIGAND; MAGNETIC FIELD; MERCURY (ELEMENT); NANOTECHNOLOGY; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; POROUS MEDIUM; SAMPLING; SILICA; WATER POLLUTION;

CARBAMIC ACID DERIVATIVE; CARBON DISULFIDE; MCM-41; MERCURY; NANOCOMPOSITE; NANOPARTICLE; SILICON DIOXIDE; WATER; WATER POLLUTANT;

ADSORPTION; CHEMISTRY; ENVIRONMENT; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MAGNET; PH; POROSITY; TIME; WATER POLLUTANT;

ADSORPTION; CARBAMATES; CARBON DISULFIDE; ENVIRONMENT; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MAGNETS; MERCURY; NANOCOMPOSITES; NANOPARTICLES; POROSITY; SILICON DIOXIDE; TIME FACTORS; WATER; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84921916811     PISSN: 09441344     EISSN: 16147499     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3430-6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aguilar-Arteaga K, Rodriguez JA, Barrado E (2010) Magnetic solids in analytical chemistry: a review. Anal Chim Acta 674:157–165
2. Barakat MA (2011) New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab J Chem 4:361–377
3. Bibby A, Mercier L (2002) Mercury (II) ion adsorption behavior in thiol-functionalized mesoporous silica microspheres. Chem Mater 14:1591–1597
4. 2+ adsorbents by non-ionic surfactant assembly. Microporous Mesopororous Mater 37:41–48
5. Chojnacki A, Chojnacka K, Hoffmann J, Gorecki H (2004) The application of natural zeolites for mercury removal: from laboratory tests to industrial scale. Miner Eng 17:933–937
6. Dana E, Sayari A (2011) Effect of regeneration conditions on the cyclic performance of amine-modified SBA-15 for removal of copper from aqueous solutions: composite surface design methodology. Desalination 277:54–60
7. Deng S (2006) Sorbent technology. Encycl Chem Process. doi:10.1081/E-ECHP-120007963
8. Dong J, Xu Z, Wang F (2008) Engineering and characterization of mesoporous silica-coated magnetic particles for mercury removal from industrial effluents. Appl Surf Sci 254:3522–3530
9. Evangelista SHM, Deoliveira E, Castro GR, Zara LF, Prado AGS (2007) Hexagonal mesoporous silica modified with 2-mercaptothiazoline for removing mercury from water solution. Surf Sci 601:2194–2202
10. Feng X, Fryxell GE, Wang LQ, Kim AY, Liu J, Kemner KM (1997) Functionalized monolayers on ordered mesoporous supports. Science 5314:923–926
11. Fenglian F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manage 92:407–418
12. Hakami O, Zhang Y, Banks CJ (2012) Thiol-functionalised mesoporous silica-coated magnetite nanoparticles for high efficiency removal and recovery of Hg from water. Water Res 46:3913–3922
13. Kanel S, Manning B, Charlet L, Choi H (2005) Removal of arsenic (III) from ground water by nanoscale zero-valent iron. Environ Sci Technol 39:1291–1298
14. Kim BC, Lee J, Um W, Kim J, Joo J, Lee JH, Kwak JH, Kim JH, Lee C, Lee H, Addleman RS, Hyeon T, Gu MB, Kim J (2011) Magnetic mesoporous materials for removal of environmental wastes. J Hazard Mater 192:1140–1147
15. Kurniawan TA, Chan G, Lo W, Babel S (2006) Comparisons of low-cost adsorbents for treating wastewaters laden with heavy metals. Sci Total Environ 366:409–426
16. Li G, Zhao Z, Liu J, Jiang G (2011) Effective heavy metal removal from aqueous systems by thiol functionalized magnetic mesoporous silica. J Hazard Mater 192:277–283
17. Lopes CB, Figueira P, Tavares DS, LinZ D-d-S AL, Duarte AC, RochaJ TT, Pereira E (2013) Core–shell magnetite-silica dithiocarbamate-derivatised particles achieve the water framework directive quality criteria for mercury in surface waters. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:5963–5974
18. Mercier L, Pinnavaia TJ (1998) Heavy metal ion adsorbents formed by the grafting of a thiol functionality to mesoporous silica molecular sieves: factors affecting Hg (II) uptake. Environ Sci Technol 32:2749–2754
19. Parham H, Zargar B, Shiralipour R (2012) Fast and efficient removal of mercury from water samples using magnetic ironoxide nanoparticles modified with 2-mercaptobenzothiazole. J Hazard Mater 205:94–100
20. Savage N, Diallo M, Duncan J, Street A, Sustich R (2009) Nanotechnology applications for clean water, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
21. Selvam P, Bhatia S, Sonwane C (2001) Recent advances in processing and characterization of periodic mesoporous MCM-41 silicate molecular sieves. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:3237–3261
22. Senevirathna U, Zhang W, Gu H (2011) Effect of carboxylic and thiol ligands (oxalate, cysteine) on the kinetics of desorption of Hg (II) from kaolinite. Water Soil Pollut 215:573–584
23. Shahbazi A, Younesi H, Badiei A (2011) Functionalized SBA-15 mesoporous silica by melamine-based dendrimer amines for adsorptive characteristics of Pb (II), Cu (II) and Cd (II) heavy metal ions in batch and fixed bed column. Chem Eng J 168:505–518
24. Soleimani M, Mahmodi MS, Morsali A, Khani A, Ghahraman-Afshar M (2011) Using a new ligand for solid phase extraction of mercury. J Hazard Mater 189:371–376
25. Tchounwou PB, Ayensu WK, Ninashvili N, Sutton D (2003) Review: Environmental exposure to mercury and its toxic opathologic implications for public health. Environ Toxic 18:149–175
26. Yantasee W, Warner CL, Sangvanich T, Addleman RS, Carter TG, Wiacek RJ, Fryxell GE, Timchalk C, Warner MG (2007) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous systems with thiol functionalized superparamagnetic nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 41:5114–5119
27. Yu MQ, Tian W, Sun DW, Shen WB, Wang GP, Xu N (2001) Systematic studies on adsorption of 11 trace heavy metals on thiol cotton fiber. Anal Chim Acta 428:209–218