Conference reviewing considered harmful

Operating Systems Review (ACM)

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 108-116

  Anderson, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PROGRAMS; DOMINANT FACTOR; PROGRAM COMMITTEE; SYSTEMS RESEARCH;

GAME THEORY;

EID: 77952262239     PISSN: 01635980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1531793.1531815     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. A. S. Aiyer, L. Alvisi, A. Clement, M. Dahlin, J.-P. Martin, and C. Porth. BAR fault tolerance for cooperative services. In SOSP, 2005.
2. M. Allman. Thoughts on reviewing. SIGCOMM CCR, 2008.
3. Y. An, J. Janssen, and E. E. Milios. Characterizing and mining the citation graph of the computer science literature. Knowl. Inf. Syst., 6(6):664-678, 2004.
4. K. Birman and F. Schneider. Program committee overload in systems. To appear, Communications of the ACM, 52, 2009.
5. S. Buchegger and J.-Y. L. Boudec. A robust reputation system for P2P and mobile ad-hoc networks. In Second Workshop on the Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, 2004.
6. B. Cohen. Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent. In Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, 2003.
7. J. Crowcroft, S. Keshav, and N. McKeown. Scaling the academic publication process to internet scale. Communications of the ACM, 52(1), 2009.
8. D. J. de Solla Price. Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683):510-515, 1965.
9. J. Douceur. Paper rating vs. paper ranking. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 43(2), 2009.
10. G. Ellison. Evolving standards for academic publishing: A q-r theory. Journal of Political Economy, 2002.
11. A. Feldmann. Experiences from the SIGCOMM 2005 European shadow PC. SIGCOMM CCR, 35(3):97-102, 2005.
12. C. Fine. A mind of its own: How your brain distorts and deceives. Icon Books, 2006.
13. V. Jacobson. Congestion avoidance and control. In SIGCOMM '88, pages 314-329, 1988.
14. S. Lawrence, C. L. Giles, and K. Bollacker. Digital libraries and autonomous citation indexing. IEEE Computer, 32(6):67-71, 1999.
15. R. Levin and D. Redell. An evaluation of the ninth SOSP submissions; or how (and how not) to write a good systems paper. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 17(3):35-40, 1983.
16. R. Mahajan, D. Wetherall, and T. Anderson. Mutually controlled routing with independent ISPs. In NSDI, 2007.
17. V. Petricek, I. J. Cox, H. Han, I. Councill, and C. L. Giles. A comparison of on-line computer science citation databases. In Ninth European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2005), 2005.
18. M. Piatek, T. Isdal, A. Krishnamurthy, and T. Anderson. Do incentives build robustness in BitTorrent? In NSDI, 2007.
19. M. Piatek, T. Isdal, A. Krishnamurthy, and T. Anderson. One hop reputations for peer to peer file sharing workloads. In NSDI, 2008.
20. S. Redner. How popular is your paper? an empirical study of the citation distribution. European Physical Journal B, 4(2):131-134, 1998.
21. S. Shenker, J. Kurose, and T. Anderson. Improving SIGCOMM: A few straw proposals. In www.sigcomm.org/admin/July2001RepFinal.pdf.
22. I. Stoica, R. Morris, D. Karger, F. Kaashoek, and H. Balakrishnan. Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications. In SIGCOMM, 2001.
23. V. Vishnumurthy, S. Chandrakumar, and E. Sirer. KARMA: A secure economic framework for peer-to-peer resource sharing. In Workshop on the Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, 2003.
24. P. Yalagandula and M. Dahlin. A scalable distributed information management system. In SIGCOMM, 2004.