A trimodality comparison of volumetric bone imaging technologies. Part I: Short-term precision and validity

Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 124-135

  Wong, Andy K O ^a   Beattie, Karen A ^a   Min, Kevin K H ^a   Webber, Colin E ^a   Gordon, Christopher L ^a   Papaioannou, Alexandra ^b   Cheung, Angela M W ^c   Adachi, Jonathan D ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Division of Geriatrics Hamilton Health Sciences   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

MRI; PQCT; Segmentation; Short term precision; Validity

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BODY MASS; BONE DENSITOMETRY; BONE MASS; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; BONE STRUCTURE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CORTICAL THICKNESS (BONE); FEMALE; HIGH RESOLUTION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MOTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIUS; REPRODUCIBILITY; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TIBIA; TRABECULAR BONE; VALIDITY; VOLUMETRY; BONE; BONE DENSITY; CANADA; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

AGED; BODY MASS INDEX; BONE AND BONES; BONE DENSITY; CANADA; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84921885219     PISSN: 10946950     EISSN: 15590747     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2014.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Macdonald H.M., Nishiyama K.K., Hanley D.A., Boyd S.K. Changes in trabecular and cortical bone microarchitecture at peripheral sites associated with 18 months of teriparatide therapy in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2011, 22:357-362.
2. Zanchetta J.R., Bogado C.E., Ferretti J.L., et al. Effects of teriparatide [recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34)] on cortical bone in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2003, 18(3):539-543.
3. Schneider P., Butz S., Allolio B., et al. Multicenter German reference data base for peripheral quantitative computer tomography. Technol Health Care 1995, 3(2):69-73.
4. Boutroy S., Bouxsein M.L., Munoz F., Delmas P.D. Invivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005, 90(12):6508-6515.
5. Wehrli F.W., Song H.K., Saha P.K., Wright A.C. Quantitative MRI for the assessment of bone structure and function. NMR Biomed 2006, 19(7):731-764.
6. Ouyang X., Selby K., Lang P., et al. High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the calcaneus: age-related changes in trabecular structure and comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements. Calcif Tissue Int 1997, 60(2):139-147.
7. Guglielmi G., De Serio A., Fusilli S., et al. Age-related changes assessed by peripheral QCT in healthy Italian women. Eur Radiol 2000, 10(4):609-614.
8. Sheu Y., Zmuda J.M., Boudreau R.M., et al. Bone strength measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography and the risk of nonvertebral fractures: the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study. J Bone Miner Res 2011, 26(1):63-71.
9. Lala D., Cheung A.M., Lynch C.L., et al. Measuring apparent trabecular structure with pQCT: a comparison with HR-pQCT. J Clin Densitom 2014, 17(1):47-53.
10. MacNeil J.A., Boyd S.K. Accuracy of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography for measurement of bone quality. Med Eng Phys 2007, 29(10):1096-1105.
11. Kreiger N., Tenenhouse A., Joseph L., et al. Research notes: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos)-background, rationale, methods. Can J Aging 1999, 18(3):12.
12. Pauchard Y., Liphardt A.M., Macdonald H.M., et al. Quality control for bone quality parameters affected by subject motion in high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone 2012, 50(6):1304-1310.
13. MacIntyre N.J., Adachi J.D., Webber C.E. Invivo measurement of apparent trabecular bone structure of the radius in women with low bone density discriminates patients with recent wrist fracture from those without fracture. J Clin Densitom 2003, 6(1):35-43.
14. Falcao A.X., Bergo F.P. Interactive volume segmentation with differential image foresting transforms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004, 23(9):1100-1108.
15. Falcao A.X., Stolfi J., de Alencar Lotufo R. The image foresting transform: theory, algorithms, and applications. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2004, 26(1):19-29.
16. Laib A., Ruegsegger P. Calibration of trabecular bone structure measurements of invivo three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography with 28-microm-resolution microcomputed tomography. Bone 1999, 24(1):35-39.
17. Parfitt A.M., Mathews C.H., Villanueva A.R., et al. Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. J Clin Invest 1983, 72(4):1396-1409.
18. Fedorov A., Beichel R., Kalpathy-Cramer J., et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012, 30(9):1323-1341.
19. Gluer C.C., Blake G., Lu Y., et al. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 1995, 5(4):262-270.
20. Kazakia G.J., Hyun B., Burghardt A.J., et al. Invivo determination of bone structure in postmenopausal women: a comparison of HR-pQCT and high-field MR imaging. J Bone Miner Res 2008, 23(4):463-474.
21. Folkesson J., Carballido-Gamio J., Eckstein F., et al. Local bone enhancement fuzzy clustering for segmentation of MR trabecular bone images. Med Phys 2010, 37(1):295-302.
22. Folkesson J., Goldenstein J., Carballido-Gamio J., et al. Longitudinal evaluation of the effects of alendronate on MRI bone microarchitecture in postmenopausal osteopenic women. Bone 2011, 48(3):611-621.
23. Krug R., Carballido-Gamio J., Burghardt A.J., et al. Assessment of trabecular bone structure comparing magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography exvivo and invivo. Osteoporos Int 2008, 19(5):653-661.
24. Calder K., Inglis D., MacIntyre N.J. Comparison of pQCT-based measures of radial bone geometry and apparent trabecular bone structure using manufacturer and in-house developed algorithms. J Clin Densitom 2010, 13:433-440.
25. Burghardt A.J., Buie H.R., Laib A., et al. Reproducibility of direct quantitative measures of cortical bone microarchitecture of the distal radius and tibia by HR-pQCT. Bone 2010, 47(3):519-528.
26. Blumenfeld J., Carballido-Gamio J., Krug R., et al. Automatic prospective registration of high-resolution trabecular bone images of the tibia. Ann Biomed Eng 2007, 35(11):1924-1931.
27. Cheung AM, Chan C, Ahmed F, etal 2008 Intra-operator precision for invivo high resolution pQCT scans. In: ISCD, ed. International Society for Clinical Densitometry 14th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA 12-15.