Retention and flux characteristics of nanofiltration membranes during hemicellulose prehydrolysate concentration

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 260, Issue , 2015, Pages 605-615

  Ajao, Olumoye ^a   Rahni, Mohamed ^b   Marinova, Mariya ^a   Chadjaa, Hassan ^b   Savadogo, Oumarou ^a  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Centre National en Électrochimie et en Technologies Environnementales Collège Shawinigan   (Canada)

Author keywords

Furfural biorefinery; Hemicelluloses concentration; Kraft process; Membrane filtration; Prehydrolysate

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; ALDEHYDES; CELLULOSE; FILTRATION; FURFURAL; KRAFT PROCESS; KRAFT PULP; MEMBRANES; MICROFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION; ORGANIC POLYMERS; PAPER AND PULP MILLS; PH; PULP COOKING; REFINING; SUGAR SUBSTITUTES; SUGARS; WOOD PRODUCTS;

BIOREFINERIES; FLUX CHARACTERISTICS; MEMBRANE FILTRATIONS; PREHYDROLYSATE; PROCESS EQUIPMENTS; RESPONSE SURFACE MODELING; TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURES; VALUE ADDED PRODUCTS;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

CHIPS; DISSOLVING PULPS; ETHANOL; FILTRATION; FURFURAL; HEATING; KRAFT PULPING; MOLECULAR WEIGHT;

EID: 84921874114     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Lange J.-P., van der Heide E., van Buijtenen J., Price R. Furfural-a promising platform for lignocellulosic biofuels. ChemSusChem 2012, 5:150-166.
2. Dutta S., De S., Saha B., Alam M.I. Advances in conversion of hemicellulosic biomass to furfural and upgrading to biofuels. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2:2025-2036.
3. Christopher L.P. Integrated forest biorefineries: current state and development potential, Integrated forest biorefineries: challenges and opportunities. R. Soc. Chem. 2012, 1-66. 10.1039/9781849735063-00001.
4. Johnson J.A., Walse S.S., Gerik J.S. Status of alternatives for methyl bromide in the United States. Outlooks Pest Manag. 2012, 23:53-58.
5. O. Ajao, M. Rahni, H. Chadjaa, M. Marinova, O. Savadogo, J. Paris, Hemicelluloses concentration and recovery using reverse osmosis (RO) membrane: application to an integrated biorefinery for furfural production, in: 63rd Canadian Chemical Engineering Conference, Fredericton, New Brunswick, 2013.
6. Lamminpää K., Ahola J., Tanskanen J. Kinetics of xylose dehydration into furfural in formic acid. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51:6297-6303.
7. Ajao O., Rahni M., Marinova M., Chadjaa H., Savadogo O. Concentration of hemicelluloses prehydrolysate by membrane filtration: feasibility and effect of composition on flux decline mechanisms. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, (Submitted).
8. Radiotis T., Zhang X., Paice M., Byrne V. Optimizing hardwood prehydrolysis for simultaneous production of bioproducts and biomaterials. J. Bioprocess Eng. Biorefinery 2012, 1:69-76.
9. Singleton V.L., Rossi J.A. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 1965, 16:144-158.
10. Wood I.P., Elliston A., Ryden P., Bancroft I., Roberts I.N., Waldron K.W. Rapid quantification of reducing sugars in biomass hydrolysates: improving the speed and precision of the dinitrosalicylic acid assay. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 44:117-121.
11. Mo Y., Zhao L., Wang Z., Chen C.-L., Tan G.-Y.A., Wang J.-Y. Enhanced styrene recovery from waste polystyrene pyrolysis using response surface methodology coupled with Box-Behnken design. Waste Manage. 2014, 34:763-769.
12. Tian M., Park H., Row K.H. Optimization of synthesis amounts of polymers with two monomers by different methods based on response surface methodology. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2014, 33. (n/a-n/a).
13. Stade S., Kallioinen M., Mikkola A., Tuuva T., Mänttäri M. Reversible and irreversible compaction of ultrafiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 118:127-134.
14. Persson K.M., Gekas V., Trägårdh G. Study of membrane compaction and its influence on ultrafiltration water permeability. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 100:155-162.
15. Déon S., Dutournié P., Fievet P., Limousy L., Bourseau P. Concentration polarization phenomenon during the nanofiltration of multi-ionic solutions: influence of the filtrated solution and operating conditions. Water Res. 2013, 47:2260-2272.
16. J.I. Marriott, Detailed modelling and optimal design of membrane separation systems, in: University of London, 2001.
17. Zhang Q., Vecitis C.D. Conductive CNT-PVDF membrane for capacitive organic fouling reduction. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 459:143-156.
18. Pendergast M.T.M., Nygaard J.M., Ghosh A.K., Hoek E.M.V. Using nanocomposite materials technology to understand and control reverse osmosis membrane compaction. Desalination 2010, 261:255-263.
19. Lin Y.-L., Lee C.-H. Elucidating the rejection mechanisms of PPCPs by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53:6798-6806.
20. De Munari A., Semiao A.J.C., Antizar-Ladislao B. Retention of pesticide Endosulfan by nanofiltration: influence of organic matter-pesticide complexation and solute-membrane interactions. Water Res. 2013, 47:3484-3496.
21. Bellona C., Drewes J.E., Xu P., Amy G. Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment-a literature review. Water Res. 2004, 38:2795-2809.
22. Qiu P., Cui M., Kang K., Park B., Son Y., Khim E., Jang M., Khim J. Application of Box-Behnken design with response surface methodology for modeling and optimizing ultrasonic oxidation of arsenite with H2O2. Cent. Eur. J. Chem. 2014, 12:164-172.