Retention of pesticide Endosulfan by nanofiltration: Influence of organic matter-pesticide complexation and solute-membrane interactions

Water Research

Volumn 47, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 3484-3496

  De Munari, Annalisa ^a   Semiao, Andrea Joana Correia ^b   Antizar Ladislao, Blanca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Micropollutant; Nanofiltration; Natural organic matter; Solute membrane interactions; Solute solute interactions

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; INSECTICIDES; MEMBRANES; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; POTABLE WATER; WATER QUALITY; WATER TREATMENT;

ENDOSULFANS; HUMIC ACID; MEMBRANE INTERACTIONS; MICROPOLLUTANTS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUTOFF; NATURAL ORGANIC MATTERS; ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS; REMOVAL MECHANISM; SOLUTE-MEMBRANE INTERACTION; SOLUTE-SOLUTE INTERACTIONS;

NANOFILTRATION;

ENDOSULFAN; HUMIC ACID;

COMPLEXATION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DRINKING WATER; ENDOSULFAN; FILTRATION; HUMIC ACID; MEMBRANE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; ORGANIC MATTER; ORGANIC POLLUTANT; PARTICLE SIZE; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; SOLUTE; WATER QUALITY; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; MEMBRANE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION; PH; POLLUTANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLID PHASE MICROEXTRACTION; SOLUTE;

EID: 84877667533     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: 18792448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.03.055     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Agbekodo K.M., Legube B., Dard S. Atrazine and simazine removal mechanisms by nanofiltration: influence of natural organic matter concentration. Water Research 1996, 30(11):2535-2542.
2. Banasiak L.J. Removal of Inorganic and Trace Organic Contaminants by Electrodialysis 2009, PhD thesis, The University of Edinburgh.
3. Bellona C., Drewes J.E., Xu P., Amy G. Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment - a literature review. Water Research 2004, 38(12):2795-2809.
4. Boussahel R., Montiel A., Baudu M. Effects of organic and inorganic matter on pesticide rejection by nanofiltration. Desalination 2002, 145(1-3):109-114.
5. Braghetta A., Di Giano F.A., Ball W.B. Nanofiltration of natural organic matter: pH and ionic strength effects. Journal of Environmental Engineering 1997, 123(7):628-641.
6. Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 1996, 119(2):253-268.
7. Chin Y., Aiken G., O'Loughlin E. Molecular weight, polydispersity, and spectroscopic properties of aquatic humic substances. Environmental Science and Technology 1994, 28(11):1853-1858.
8. Cyna B., Chagneau G., Bablon G., Tanghe N. Two years of nanofiltration at the Méry-sur-Oise plant, France. Desalination 2002, 147(1-3):69-75.
9. Dalwani M., Benes N.E., Bargeman G., Stamatialis D., Wessling M. Effect of pH on the performance of polyamide/polyacrylonitrile based thin film composite membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 372(1-2):228-238.
10. Dalwani M., Benes N.E., Bargeman G., Stamatialis D., Wessling M. A method for characterizing membranes during nanofiltration at extreme pH. Journal of Membrane Science 2010, 363(1-2):188-194.
11. de Gennes P.G. Wetting: statics and dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics 1985, 57(3):827-863.
12. De Munari A. Removal Mechanisms of Organic and Inorganic Solutes in Raw, Upland Drinking Water by Nanofiltration: Influence of Solute-solute and Solute-membrane Interactions 2012, PhD thesis, The University of Edinburgh.
13. Devitt E.C., Ducellier F., CÔté P., Wiesner M. Effects of natural organic matter and the raw water matrix on the rejection of atrazine by pressure-driven membranes. Water Research 1999, 32(9):2563-2568.
14. Devitt E.C., Wiesner M.R. Dialysis investigations of atrazine-organic matter interactions and the role of a divalent metal. Environmental Science and Technology 1998, 32(2):232-237.
15. DiFilippo E.L., Eganhouse R.P. Assessment of PDMS-water partition coefficients: implications for passive environmental sampling of hydrophobic organic compounds. Environmental Science and Technology 2010, 44(18):6917-6925.
16. Forman S., Durbetaki A., Choen M., Olofson R.A. Conformational equilibria in cyclic sulfites and sulfates. The configurations and conformations of the two isomeric thiodans. Journal of Organic Chemistry 1965, 30(1):169-175.
17. German Federal Environment Agency Draft Dossier Prepared in Support of a Proposal of Endosulfan to Be Considered as a Candidate for Inclusion in the Annexes of the Stockholm Convention 2007.
18. Hajibabania S., Verliefde A., McDonald J.A., Khan S.J., Le-Clech P. Fate of trace organic compounds during treatment by nanofiltration. Journal of Membrane Science 2001, 373(1-2):130-139.
19. Hansch C., Leo A., Hoekman D. Exploring QSAR: Hydrophobic, Electronic and Steric Constants 1995, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, USA.
20. Hillenbrand T., Marscheider-Weidemann F., Strauch M., Heitmann K. Prioritäre Stoffe der Wasserrahmenrichtlinie Datenblatt Nr. 14: Endosulfan 2006, (in German).
21. Hong S., Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 1997, 132(2):159-181.
22. Jin X., Hu J., Ong S.L. Influence of dissolved organic matter on estrone removal by NF membranes and the role of their structures. Water Research 2007, 41(14):3077-3088.
23. Jin X., Hu J., Ong S.L. Removal of natural hormone estrone from secondary effluents using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Water Research 2010, 44(2):638-648.
24. Jucker C., Clark M.M. Adsorption of aquatic humic substances on hydrophobic ultrafiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 1994, 97:37-52.
25. Kimura K., Amy G., Drewes J., Watanabe Y. Adsorption of hydrophobic compounds onto NF/RO membranes: an artifact leading to overestimation of rejection. Journal of Membrane Science 2003, 221(1-2):89-101.
26. Lee N., Amy G., Croué J.-P., Buisson H. Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM). Water Research 2004, 38(20):4511-4523.
27. Miller J.N., Miller J.C. Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry 2000, Pearson Education Limited, Harlow.
28. Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentacion Endosulfan. Monograph Prepared in the Context of the Inclusion of the Following Active Substance in Annex I of the Council Directive 91/414/EEC 1999, Vol. 1.
29. Neale P.A., Escher B.I., Schäfer A.I. Quantification of solute-solute interactions using negligible-depletion solid-phase microextraction: measuring the affinity of estradiol to bulk organic matter. Environmental Science and Technology 2008, 42(8):2886-2892.
30. Neale P.A., Schäfer A.I. Quantification of solute-solute interactions in steroidal hormone removal by ultrafiltration membranes. Separation and Purification Technology 2012, 90:31-38.
31. Ng H.Y., Elimelech M. Influence of colloidal fouling on rejection of trace organic contaminants by reverse osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science 2004, 244(1-2):215-226.
32. Nghiem L.D., Schäfer A.I., Elimelech M. Removal of natural hormones by nanofiltration membranes: measurement, modeling, and mechanisms. Environmental Science and Technology 2004, 38(6):1888-1896.
33. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Environment Monograph No. 108: Final Report on the OECD Project to Compare Pesticides Data Reviews 1995.
34. Palacio L., Calvo J.I., Prádanos P., Hernández A., Väisänen P., Nyström M. Contact angles and external protein adsorption onto UF membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 1999, 152(2):189-201.
35. Peterson S.M., Batley G.E. The fate of endosulfan in aquatic ecosystems. Environmental Pollution 1993, 82(2):143-152.
36. Plakas K.V., Karabelas A.J. Triazine retention by nanofiltration in the presence of organic matter: the role of humic substance characteristics. Journal of Membrane Science 2009, 336(1-2):86-100.
37. Plakas K.V., Karabelas A.J., Wintgens T., Melin T. A study of selected herbicides retention by nanofiltration membranes-the role of organic fouling. Journal of Membrane Science 2006, 284(1-2):291-300.
38. Poerschmann J., Kopinke F.-D. Sorption of very hydrophobic organic compounds (VHOCs) on dissolved humic organic matter (DOM). 2. Measurement of sorption and application of a Flory-Huggins concept to interpret the data. Environmental Science and Technology 2001, 35(6):1142-1148.
39. Prosen H., Troha A., Zupančič - Kralj L. Studies of interaction between some organochlorine insecticides and humic acid using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography. Acta Chimica Slovenica 2002, 49(3):561-573.
40. Salvaterra A.F., Sarmento G., Minhalma M., de Pinho M.N. Nanofiltration of surface water for the removal of endocrine disruptors. Desalination and Water Treatment 2011, 35(1-3):54-61.
41. Sanches S., Penetra A., Granado C., Cardoso V.V., Ferreira E., Benoliel M.J., Barreto Crespo M.T., Pereira V.J., Crespo J.G. Removal of pesticides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from different drinking water sources by nanofiltration. Desalination and Water Treatment 2011, 27(1-3):141-149.
42. Schäfer A.I., Nghiem L.D., Meier A., Neale P.A. Impact of organic matrix compounds on the retention of steroid hormone estrone by a "loose" nanofiltration membrane. Separation and Purification Technology 2010, 73(2):179-187.
43. Schwarzenbach R.P., Escher B.I., Fenner K., Hofstetter T.B., Johnson C.A., von Gunten U., Wehrli B. The challenge of micropollutants in aquatic systems. Science 2006, 313(5790):1072-1077.
44. Semião A.J.C., Schäfer A.I. Estrogenic micropollutant adsorption dynamics onto nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 381(1-2):132-141.
45. Semião A.J.C., Schäfer A.I. Removal of adsorbing estrogenic micropollutants by nanofiltration membranes. Part A - experimental evidence. Journal of Membrane Science 2012, 431:244-256.
46. Shin H.-S., Monsallier J.M., Choppin G.R. Spectroscopic and chemical characterizations of molecular size fractionated humic acid. Talanta 1999, 50(3):641-647.
47. Soto A., Chung K., Sonnenschein C. The pesticide endosulfan, toxaphene and dieldrin have estrogenic effects on human estrogen-sensitive cells. Environmental Health Perspectives 1994, 102(4):380-383.
48. Teixeira M.R., Rosa M.J., Nyström M. The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. Journal of Membrane Science 2005, 265(1-2):160-166.
49. Vaes W.H.J., Ramos E.U., Hamwijk C., van Holsteijn I., Blaauboer B.J., Seinen W., Verhaar H.J.M., Hermens J.L.M. Solid phase microextraction as a tool to determine membrane/water partition coefficients and bioavailable concentrations invitro systems. Chemical Research in Toxicology 1997, 10(10):1067-1072.
50. Valor I., Perez M., Cortada C., Apraiz D., Molto J.C., Font G. SPME of 52 pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls: extraction efficiencies of the SPME coatings poly(dimethylsiloxane), polyacrylate, poly(dimethylsiloxane)-divinylbenzene, carboxenpoly(dimethylsiloxane) and carbowaxdivinylbenzene. Journal of Separation Science 2001, 24(1):39-48.
51. Van der Bruggen B., Verliefde A., Braeken L., Cornelissen E., Moons K., Verberk J., Van Dijk H., Amy G.L. Assessment of a semi-quantitative method for estimation of the rejection of organic compounds in aqueous solution in nanofiltration. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 2006, 81(7):1166-1176.
52. Xu P., Drewes J.E., Bellona C., Amy G.L., Kim T.U., Adam M., Heberer T. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications. Water Environment Research 2005, 77(1):40-48.
53. Xu P., Drewes J.E., Kim T.-U., Bellona C., Amy G. Effect of membrane fouling on transport of organic contaminants in NF/RO membrane applications. Journal of Membrane Science 2006, 279(1-2):165-175.
54. Yoon Y., Westerhoff P., Snyder S.A., Wert E.C. Nanofiltration and ultrafiltration of endocrine disrupting compounds, pharmaceuticals and personal care products. Journal of Membrane Science 2006, 270(1-2):88-100.