Self-reported health following percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from a cohort followed for 3 years with multiple measurements

Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 6, Issue , 2014, Pages 441-449

  Biering, Karin ^a   Frydenberg, Morten ^b   Hjollund, Niels Henrik ^a,c  

^a REGIONAL HOSPITAL WEST JUTLAND   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Coronary heart disease; Longitudinal study; Multiple imputation; Patient reported outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SELF REPORT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SHORT FORM 12; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84921817064     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11791349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S65476     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. The Danish Heart Foundation, National Institute of Public Health. Hjertekarsygdomme i Danmark – forekomst og udvikling 2000–2009. [Cardiovascular Disease in Denmark: Occurrence and Development 2000–2009]. Report, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark 2011. Danish.
2. Mackay J, Mensah GA. The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
3. Rumsfeld JS. Health status and clinical practice: when will they meet? Circulation. 2002;106(1):5–7.
4. Valderas JM, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M, et al. The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2008;17(2):179–193.
5. Biering K, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K, Niemann T, Hjollund NH. Return to work after percutaneous coronary intervention: the predictive value of self-reported health compared to clinical measures. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49268.
6. Lenzen MJ, Scholte op Reimer WJ, Pedersen SS, et al. The additional value of patient-reported health status in predicting 1-year mortality after invasive coronary procedures: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularisation. Heart. 2007;93(3):339–344.
7. Mejhert M, Kahan T, Persson H, Edner M. Predicting readmissions and cardiovascular events in heart failure patients. Int J Cardiol. 2006;109(1):108–113.
8. Rumsfeld JS, MaWhinney S, McCarthy M Jr, et al. Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Participants of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Processes, Structures, and Outcomes of Care in Cardiac Surgery. JAMA. 1999;281(14):1298–1303.
9. Thombs BD, Ziegelstein RC, Stewart DE, Abbey SE, Parakh K, Grace SL. Physical health status assessed during hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome predicts mortality 12 months later. J Psychosom Res. 2008;65(6):587–593.
10. Hawkes AL, Mortensen OS. Up to one third of individual cardiac patients have a decline in quality of life post-intervention. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2006;40(4):214–218.
11. Skodova Z, van Dijk J P, Nagyova I, et al. Psychosocial predictors of change in quality of life in patients after coronary interventions. Heart Lung. 2011;40(4):331–339.
12. Mortensen OS, Bjorner JB, Newman B, et al. Gender differences in health-related quality of life following ST-elevation myocardial infarction: women and men do not beneft from primary percutaneous coronary intervention to the same degree. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007;14(1):37–43.
13. Pedersen SS, Ong AT, Lemos PA, Erdman RA, Serruys P W, van Domburg RT. Risk factors for impaired health status differ in women and men treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era. J Psychosom Res. 2006;61(1):11–17.
14. Schenkeveld L, Pedersen SS, van Nierop J W, et al. Health-related quality of life and long-term mortality in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 2010;159(3):471–476.
15. Tofghi S, Ahmad Kiadaliri A, Sadeghifar J, Raadabadi M, Mamikhani J. Health-Related Quality of Life among Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Post-Treatment Follow-Up Study in Iran. Cardiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:973-974.
16. Wong MS, Chair SY. Changes in health-related quality of life following percutaneous coronary intervention: a longitudinal study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(8):1334–1342.
17. Cohen DJ, Van Hout B, Serruys P W, et al. Quality of life after PCI with drug-eluting stents or coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(11):1016–1026.
18. Rubenach S, Shadbolt B, McCallum J, Nakamura T. Assessing health-related quality of life following myocardial infarction: is the SF-12 useful? J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(3):306–309.
19. van Domburg RT, Daemen J, Morice MC, et al. Short- and long-term health related quality-of-life and anginal status of the Arterial Revas-cularisation Therapies Study part II, ARTS-II; sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention. 2010;5(8):962–967.
20. Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P, et al. Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(7): 677–687.
21. Danish Health and Medicines Authority [homepage on the Internet]. Treatment in Hospitals. Available from: http://www.ssi.dk/Sundhedsdataogit.aspx. Accessed September 14, 2014.
22. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483.
23. Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, et al. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25(2):333–341.
24. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–233.
25. United Nations Educational, Scientifc and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). International Standard Classification of Education: ISCED 1997. Paris: UNESCO; 1997. Available from: http://www.unesco.org/education/information/nfsunesco/doc/isced_1997. Accessed September 14, 2014.
26. Hjollund NH, Larsen FB, Andersen JH. Register-based follow-up of social benefts and other transfer payments: accuracy and degree of completeness in a Danish interdepartmental administrative database compared with a population-based survey. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(5):497–502.
27. Schmidt M, Maeng M, Jakobsen CJ, et al. Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: The Western Denmark Heart Registry. Clin Epidemiol. 2010;2:137–144.
28. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383.
29. Biering K, Hjollund N, Frydenberg M. Using multiple imputation to deal with missing data and attrition in longitudinal studies with repeated measures of patient-reported outcomes. In press.
30. Skodova Z, Nagyova I, van Dijk J P, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in quality of life and psychological outcomes among cardiac patients. Int J Public Health. 2009;54(4):233–240.
31. De Smedt D, Clays E, Doyle F, et al. Validity and reliability of three commonly used quality of life measures in a large European population of coronary heart disease patients. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167(5):2294–2299.
32. Dempster M, Donnelly M. A Comparative Analysis of the SF-12 and the SF-36 among Ischaemic Heart Disease Patients. J Health Psychol. 2001;6(6):707–711.
33. Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1997.
34. Bufe A, Wolfertz J, Dinh W, et al. Gender-based differences in long-term outcome after ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010;19(3):471–475.
35. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital. [Myocardial Infarcation – Occurrence and Prognosis. A Study of F irsttime Admissions in Region North Jutland and Region Middle Jutland]. Aaruhus: Aarhus University Hospital; 2008. Available from: http://www.kea.au.dk/fle/pdf/43.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2014. Danish.
36. Sjauw KD, Stegenga NK, Engstrom AE, et al. The influence of gender on short- and long-term outcome after primary PCI and delivered medical care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. EuroIntervention. 2010;5(7):780–787.
37. Bjørner JB, Trab Damsgaard M, Watt T, et al. [Danish Manual for SF-36: A Questionaire about Health-Status]. [S.l.]: Lif; 1997. Danish.
38. Denvir MA, Lee AJ, Rysdale J, et al. Infuence of socioeconomic status on clinical outcomes and quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(12):1085–1088.