Assessing health-related quality of life following myocardial infarction: Is the SF-12 useful?

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 306-309

  Rubenach, S ^a   Shadbolt, B ^a   McCallum, J ^b   Nakamura, T ^b  

^a CANBERRA HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Health related quality of life; Myocardial infarction; Responsiveness; SF 12; SF 36

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HEART INFARCTION; HEART REHABILITATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF CARE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0036190053     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00426-7     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Measuring health-related quality of life
2. Quality of life after myocardial infarction
3. Measuring quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease
4. The assessment of recovery in patients after myocardial infarction using three generic quality-of-life measures
5. Evaluating changes in health status: Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders
6. Comparison of three quality of life instruments in stable angina pectoris: Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and quality of life index-cardiac version III
7. Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease
8. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness
9. Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach
10. Sensitivity to change of health status measures in a randomized controlled trial: Comparison of the COOP charts and the SF-36
11. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments
12. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation
13. Comparative responsiveness of generic versus disease-specific and weighted versus unweighted health status measures in carpal tunnel syndrome
14. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life
15. Measuring the health related quality of life of people with ischaemic heart disease
16. Longitudinal sensitivity of generic and specific health measures in chronic sinusitis
17. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection
18. A self-administered quality-of-life questionnaire after acute myocardial infarction
19. A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity
20. Use of the 12-item short-form (SF-12) health survey in an Australian heart and stroke population
21. Validity of the SF-12 compared with the SF-36 Health Survey in pilot studies of the Australian longitudinal study on women's health
22. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: Results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment
23. A shorter form health survey: Can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies?
24. Hospital outcomes management: The Care Continuum and Health Outcomes Project
25. Quality of life four years after acute myocardial infarction: Short form 36 scores compared with a normal population
26. A population-based perspective of changes in health-related quality of life after myocardial infarction in older men and women
27. A randomised controlled trial of community based counselling among those discharged from hospital with ischaemic heart disease
28. Statistical issues encountered in the comparison of health-related quality of life in diseased patients to published general population norms: Problems and solutions
29. Health outcomes by self-report: Validity of the SF-36 among Australian hospital patients
30. Reproducibility and responsiveness of quality of life assessment and six minute walk test in elderly heart failure patients
31. The short form-12 by telephone as a measure of health-related quality of life after stroke
32. Comparison of the MOS short form-12 (SF12) health status questionnaire with the SF36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
33. Impact of first myocardial infarction on self-perceived health status
34. Quality of life 4 years after myocardial infarction: Are the physical and mental summary scales of the SF-12 as reliable and sensitive at measuring quality of life as those of the SF-36?