Gamma-range synchronization of fast-spiking interneurons can enhance detection of tactile stimuli

Nature Neuroscience

Volumn 17, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1371-1379

  Siegle, Joshua H ^a,b   Pritchett, Dominique L ^a,b,c   Moore, Christopher I ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c CHAMPALIMAUD CENTRE FOR THE UNKNOWN   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL ACTIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL SYNCHRONIZATION; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; FAST SPIKING INTERNEURON; GAMMA RHYTHM; INTERNEURON; LATENT PERIOD; LOCAL FIELD POTENTIAL; MOUSE; NEOCORTEX; NONHUMAN; OPTOGENETICS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALIENCE NETWORK; SPIKE WAVE; TACTILE STIMULATION; VIBRISSA; ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; EVOKED RESPONSE; GENETICS; INNERVATION; MALE; METABOLISM; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SENSORY NERVE; TOUCH; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

CHANNELRHODOPSIN 2, MOUSE; PARVALBUMIN; PHOTOPROTEIN; RED FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; RHODOPSIN;

ACTION POTENTIALS; AFFERENT PATHWAYS; ANIMALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS; INTERNEURONS; LUMINESCENT PROTEINS; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, TRANSGENIC; OPTOGENETICS; PARVALBUMINS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RHODOPSIN; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TOUCH; VIBRISSAE;

EID: 84921799967     PISSN: 10976256     EISSN: 15461726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nn.3797     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Fries, P., Reynolds, J.H., Rorie, A.E. & Desimone, R. Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention. Science 291, 1560-1563 (2001).
2. Fries, P., Womelsdorf, T., Oostenveld, R. & Desimone, R. The effects of visual stimulation and selective visual attention on rhythmic neuronal synchronization in macaque area V4. J. Neurosci. 28, 4823-4835 (2008).
3. Bosman, C.A. et al. Attentional stimulus selection through selective synchronization between monkey visual areas. Neuron 75, 875-888 (2012).
4. Ray, S., Ni, A.M. & Maunsell, J.H. Strength of gamma rhythm depends on normalization. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001477 (2013).
5. Meador, K.J., Ray, P.G., Echauz, J.R., Loring, D.W. & Vachtsevanos, G.J. Gamma coherence and conscious perception. Neurology 59, 847-854 (2002).
6. Womelsdorf, T., Fries, P., Mitra, P.P. & Desimone, R. Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection. Nature 439, 733-736 (2006).
7. Hoogenboom, N., Schoffelen, J.M., Oostenveld, R. & Fries, P. Visually induced gamma-band activity predicts speed of change detection in humans. Neuroimage 51, 1162-1167 (2010).
8. Wang, X.J. & Buzsáki, G. Gamma oscillation by synaptic inhibition in a hippocampal interneuronal network model. J. Neurosci. 16, 6402-6413 (1996).
9. Börgers, C. & Kopell, N. Synchronization in networks of excitatory and inhibitory neurons with sparse, random connectivity. Neural Comput. 15, 509-538 (2003).
10. Tiesinga, P.H., Fellous, J.M., Salinas, E., José, J.V. & Sejnowski, T.J. Inhibitory synchrony as a mechanism for attentional gain modulation. J. Physiol. Paris 98, 296-314 (2004).
11. Börgers, C. & Kopell, N.J. Gamma oscillations and stimulus selection. Neural Comput. 20, 383-414 (2008).
12. Knoblich, U., Siegle, J.H., Pritchett, D.L. & Moore, C.I. What do we gain from gamma? Local dynamic gain modulation drives enhanced efficacy and efficiency of signal transmission. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4, 185 (2010).
13. Shadlen, M.N. & Movshon, J.A. Synchrony unbound: a critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis. Neuron 24, 67-77, 111-125 (1999).
14. Ray, S. & Maunsell, J.H. Differences in gamma frequencies across visual cortex restrict their possible use in computation. Neuron 67, 885-896 (2010).
15. Penttonen, M., Kamondi, A., Acsady, L. & Buzsaki, G. Gamma frequency oscillation in the hippocampus of the rat: intracellular analysis in vivo. Eur. J. Neurosci. 10, 718-728 (1998).
16. Whittington, M.A., Traub, R.D., Kopell, N., Ermentrout, B. & Buhl, E.H. Inhibition-based rhythms: experimental and mathematical observations on network dynamics. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 38, 315-336 (2000).
17. Hasenstaub, A. et al. Inhibitory postsynaptic potentials carry synchronized frequency information in active cortical networks. Neuron 47, 423-435 (2005).
18. Börgers, C., Epstein, S. & Kopell, N.J. Gamma oscillations mediate stimulus competition and attentional selection in a cortical network model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18023-18028 (2008).
19. Cardin, J.A. et al. Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses. Nature 459, 663-667 (2009).
20. Sohal, V.S., Zhang, F., Yizhar, O. & Deisseroth, K. Parvalbumin neurons and gamma rhythms enhance cortical circuit performance. Nature 459, 698-702 (2009).
21. Buzsáki, G. & Wang, X.J. Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35, 203-225 (2012).
22. Moore, C.I., Carlen, M., Knoblich, U. & Cardin, J.A. Neocortical interneurons: from diversity, strength. Cell 142, 189-193 (2010).
23. Traub, R.D., Whittington, M.A., Colling, S.B., Buzsáki, G. & Jefferys, J.G. Analysis of gamma rhythms in the rat hippocampus in vitro and in vivo. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 493, 471-484 (1996).
24. Cardin, J.A. et al. Targeted optogenetic stimulation and recording of neurons in vivo using cell-type-specific expression of Channelrhodopsin-2. Nat. Protoc. 5, 247-254 (2010).
25. Carlén, M. et al. A critical role for NMDA receptors in parvalbumin interneurons for gamma rhythm induction and behavior. Mol. Psychiatry 17, 537-548 (2012).
26. Cohen, J.D. & Castro-Alamancos, M.A. Detection of low salience whisker stimuli requires synergy of tectal and thalamic sensory relays. J. Neurosci. 30, 2245-2256 (2010).
27. Miyashita, T. & Feldman, D.E. Behavioral detection of passive whisker stimuli requires somatosensory cortex. Cereb. Cortex 23, 1655-1662 (2013).
28. Sachidhanandam, S., Sreenivasan, V., Kyriakatos, A., Kremer, Y. & Petersen, C.C. Membrane potential correlates of sensory perception in mouse barrel cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1671-1677 (2013).
29. Hamada, Y., Miyashita, E. & Tanaka, H. Gamma-band oscillations in the "barrel cortex" precede rats exploratory whisking. Neuroscience 88, 667-671 (1999).
30. Sirota, A. et al. Entrainment of neocortical neurons and gamma oscillations by the hippocampal theta rhythm. Neuron 60, 683-697 (2008).
31. Jones, M.S. & Barth, D.S. Sensory-evoked high-frequency (gamma-band) oscillating potentials in somatosensory cortex of the unanesthetized rat. Brain Res. 768, 167-176 (1997).
32. Shaw, F.Z. & Chew, J.H. Dynamic changes of gamma activities of somatic cortical evoked potentials during wake-sleep states in rats. Brain Res. 983, 152-161 (2003).
33. Adesnik, H. & Scanziani, M. Lateral competition for cortical space by layer-specific horizontal circuits. Nature 464, 1155-1160 (2010).
34. Shao, Y.R. et al. Plasticity of recurrent l2/3 inhibition and gamma oscillations by whisker experience. Neuron 80, 210-222 (2013).
35. Baranauskas, G. et al. Origins of 1/f2 scaling in the power spectrum of intracortical local field potential. J. Neurophysiol. 107, 984-994 (2012).
36. Jia, X., Tanabe, S. & Kohn, A. Gamma and the coordination of spiking activity in early visual cortex. Neuron 77, 762-774 (2013).
37. Börgers, C., Epstein, S. & Kopell, N.J. Background gamma rhythmicity and attention in cortical local circuits: a computational study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7002-7007 (2005).
38. Ritt, J.T., Andermann, M.L. & Moore, C.I. Embodied information processing: vibrissa mechanics and texture features shape micromotions in actively sensing rats. Neuron 57, 599-613 (2008).
39. Wolfe, J. et al. Texture coding in the rat whisker system: slip-stick versus differential resonance. PLoS Biol. 6, e215 (2008).
40. Pinto, D.J., Brumberg, J.C. & Simons, D.J. Circuit dynamics and coding strategies in rodent somatosensory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 83, 1158-1166 (2000).
41. Gerdjikov, T.V., Bergner, C.G., Stöttgen, M.C., Waiblinger, C. & Schwarz, C. Discrimination of vibrotactile stimuli in the rat whisker system: behavior and neurometrics. Neuron 65, 530-540 (2010).
42. Jadhav, S.P., Wolfe, J. & Feldman, D.E. Sparse temporal coding of elementary tactile features during active whisker sensation. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 792-800 (2009).
43. Gross, J., Schnitzler, A., Timmermann, L. & Ploner, M. Gamma oscillations in human primary somatosensory cortex reflect pain perception. PLoS Biol. 5, e133 (2007).
44. Fellous, -M., Rudolph, M., Destexhe, A. & Sejnowski, J. Synaptic background noise controls the input/output characteristics of single cells in an in vitro model of in vivo activity. Neuroscience 122, 811-829 (2003).
45. Rudolph, M., Pospischil, M., Timofeev, I. & Destexhe, A. Inhibition determines membrane potential dynamics and controls action potential generation in awake and sleeping cat cortex. J. Neurosci. 27, 5280-5290 (2007).
46. OConnor, D.H. et al. Neural coding during active somatosensation revealed using illusory touch. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 958-965 (2013).
47. Histed, M.H. & Maunsell, J.H. Cortical neural populations can guide behavior by integrating inputs linearly, independent of synchrony. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E178-E187 (2014).
48. Doron, G., von Heimendahl, M., Schlattmann, P., Houweling, A. & Brecht, M. Spiking Irregularity and Frequency Modulate the Behavioral Report of Single-Neuron Stimulation. Neuron 81, 653-663 (2014).
49. Lee, S.H. et al. Activation of specific interneurons improves V1 feature selectivity and visual perception. Nature 488, 379-383 (2012).
50. Engel, A.K. & Singer, W. Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 16-25 (2001).
51. Boyden, E.S. et al. Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1263-1268 (2005).
52. Tsien, J.Z. et al. Subregion-and cell type-restricted gene knockout in mouse brain. Cell 87, 1317-1326 (1996).
53. Nguyen, D.P. et al. Micro-drive array for chronic in vivo recording: tetrode assembly. J. Vis. Exp. 26, 1098 (2009).
54. Voigts, J., Siegle, J.H., Pritchett, D.L. & Moore, C.I. The flexDrive: An ultra-light implant for optical control and highly parallel chronic recording of neuronal ensembles in freely moving mice. Front. Sys. Neurosci. 7, 8 (2013).
55. Siegle, J.H. Combining optical stimulation with extracellular electrophysiology in behaving mice. in Neuronal Network Analysis (eds. Fellin, T. & Halassa, M.) 357-372 (Springer, 2012).
56. Carvell, G.E. & Simons, D.J. Membrane potential changes in rat SmI cortical neurons evoked by controlled stimulation of mystacial vibrissae. Brain Res. 448, 186-191 (1988).
57. Armstrong-James, M., Fox, K. & Das-Gupta, A. Flow of excitation within rat barrel cortex on striking a single vibrissa. J. Neurophysiol. 68, 1345-1358 (1992).
58. Moore, C.I. & Nelson, S.B. Spatio-temporal subthreshold receptive fields in the vibrissa representation of rat primary somatosensory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 2882-2892 (1998).
59. Brecht, M., Roth, A. & Sakmann, B. Dynamic receptive fields of reconstructed pyramidal cells in layers 3 and 2 of rat somatosensory barrel cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 553, 243-265 (2003).
60. Tolias, A.S. et al. Recording chronically from the same neurons in awake, behaving primates. J. Neurophysiol. 98, 3780-3790 (2007).
61. Schmitzer-Torbert, N., Jackson, J., Henze, D., Harris, K. & Redish, A.D. Quantitative measures of cluster quality for use in extracellular recordings. Neuroscience 131, 1-11 (2005).
62. Davidson, T.J., Kloosterman, F. & Wilson, M.A. Hippocampal replay of extended experience. Neuron 63, 497-507 (2009).
63. Goldberg, J.M. & Brown, P.B. Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. J. Neurophysiol. 32, 613-636 (1969).
64. Kumbhani, R.D., Nolt, M.J. & Palmer, L.A. Precision, reliability, and information-Theoretic analysis of visual thalamocortical neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 98, 2647-2663 (2007).