Gamma oscillations and stimulus selection

Neural Computation

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 383-414

  Borgers, Christoph ^a   Kopell, Nancy J ^b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGICAL RHYTHM; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTROSTIMULATION; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; OSCILLOMETRY; PHYSIOLOGY; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL CLOCKS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURONS; OSCILLOMETRY; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

EID: 38649112987     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2007.07-06-289     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abbott, L. F. (1999). Lapicque's introduction of the integrate-and-fire model neuron (1907). Brain Res. Bull., 50(5/6), 303-304.
2. Borgers, C., Epstein, S., & Kopell, N. (2005). Background gamma rhythmicity and attention in cortical local circuits: A computational study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 202(19), 7002-7007.
3. Borgers, C., & Kopell, N. (2005). Effects of noisy drive on rhythms in networks of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Neural Comp., 27(3), 557-608.
4. Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001). Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 2,704-716.
5. Ermentrout, G. B. (1996). Type I membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony. Neural Comp., 8, 879-1001.
6. Ermentrout, G. B., & Kopell, N. (1986). Parabolic bursting in an excitable system coupled with a slow oscillation. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 46, 233-253.
7. Fries, P. (2005). A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: Neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 474-480.
8. Fries, P., Schröder, J.-H., Roelfsema, P. R., Singer, W., & Engel, A. K. (2002). Oscillatory neuronal synchronization in primary visual cortex as a correlate of stimulus selection. J. Neurosci., 22, 3739-3754.
9. Funabiki, K., Koyano, K., & Ohmori, H. (1998). The role of GABaergic inputs for CD in the neurones of nucleus laminaris of the chick. J. Physiol. (London), 508, 851-869.
10. Grande, L. A., Kinney, G. A., Miracle, G. L., & Spain, W. J. (2004). Dynamic influences on coincidence detection in neocortical pyramidal neurons. J. Neurosci., 24(8), 1839-1851.
11. Gruber, T., Müller, M. M., Keil, A., & Elbert, T. (1999). Selective visual-spatial attention alters induced gamma band responses in the human EEG. Clinical Neurophysiology, 220(12), 2074-2085.
12. Gutkin, B. S., & Ermentrout, G. B. (1998). Dynamics of membrane excitability determine interspike interval variability: A link between spike generation mechanisms and cortical spike train statistics. Neural Comp., 10, 1047-1065.
13. Gutkin, B. S., Ermentrout, G. B., & Reyes, A. D. (2005). Phase-response curves give the responses of neurons to transient inputs. J. Neurophysiol., 94, 1623-1635.
14. Hasselmo, M. E., & McGaughy, J. (2003). High acetylcholine levels set circuit dynamics for attention and encoding and low acetylcholine levels set dynamics for consolidation. Progress in Brain Research, 145, 207-231.
15. Hausser, M., & Clark, B. A. (1997). Tonic synaptic inhibition modulates neuronal output pattern and spatiotemporal synpatic integration. Neuron, 19, 665-678.
16. Hodgkin, A. L., & Huxley, A. F. (1952). A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. (London), 227, 500-544.
17. Hoppensteadt, F. C., & Izhikevich, E. M. (1997). Weakly connected neural networks. New York: Springer-Verlag.
18. Latham, P. E., Richmond, B. J., Nelson, P. G., & Nirenberg, S. (2000). Intrinsic dynamics in neuronal networks. I. Theory. J. Neurophysiol., 83, 808-827.
19. Lumer, E. D. (2000). Effects of spike timing on winner-take-all competition in model cortical circuits. Neural Computation, 22, 181-194.
20. Lüthi, A., & McCormick, D. A. (1998). H-current: Properties of a neuronal and network pacemaker. Neuron, 22, 9-12.
21. Mishra, J., Fellous, J.-M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2006). Selective attention through phase relationship of excitatory and inhibitory input synchrony in a model cortical neuron. Neural Networks, 19, 1329-1346.
22. Murthy, V. N., & Fetz, F. E. (1994). Effects of input synchrony on the response of a three-conductance cortical neuron model. Neural Computation, 6, 1111-1126.
23. Olufsen, M., Whittington, M. A., Camperi, M., & Kopell, N. (2003). New functions for the gamma rhythm: Population tuning and preprocessing for the beta rhythm. J. Comp. Neurosci., 24, 33-54.
24. Pouille, F., & Scanziani, M. (2001). Enforcement of temporal fidelity in pyramidal cells by somatic feed-forward inhibition. Science, 293, 1159-1163.
25. Sarter, M., Givens, B., & Bruno, J. P. (2001). The cognitive neuroscience of sustained
26. attention: Where top-down meets bottom-up. Brain Res. Rev., 35, 146-160.
27. Singer, W. (1999). Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations. Neuron, 24, 49-65.
28. Singer, W., & Gray, C. M. (1995). Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 18, 555-586.
29. Tateno, T., Harsch, A., & Robinson, H. P. C. (2004). Threshold firing frequency-current relationships of neurons in rat somatosensor cortex: Type 1 and type 2 dynamics. J. Neurophysiol., 92, 2283-2294.
30. Taylor, K., Mandon, S., Freiwald, W. A., & Kreiter, A. K. (2005). Coherent oscillatory activity in monkey area V4 predicts successful allocation of attention. Cerebral Cortex, 25(9), 1424-1437.
31. Tiesinga, P. H. E. (2002). From neuron to brain: Statistical physics of the nervous system. In A. Macias, F. J. Uribe, & E. Diaz (Eds.), Developments in mathematical and experimental physics. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
32. Tiesinga, P. H. E. (2005). Stimulus competition by inhibitory interference. Neural Computation, 27, 2421-2453.
33. Tiesinga, P. H. E., Fellous, J.-M., Salinas, E., José, J. V., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2004). Synchronization as a mechanism for attentional gain modulation. Neurocomputing, 58-60, 641-646.
34. von der Malsburg, C., & Schneider, W. (1986). A neural cocktail-party processor. Biol. Cybern., 54(1), 29-40.
35. White, J. A., Banks, M. I., Pearce, R. A., & Kopell, N. J. (2000). Networks of inteneurons with fast and slow y-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) kinetics provide substrate for mixed gamma-theta rhythm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97(14), 8128-8133.