Quality of outcome data in knee arthroplasty: Comparison of registry data and worldwide non-registry studies from 4 decades

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 58-62

  Pabinger, Christof ^a,d   Lumenta, David Benjamin ^c   Cupak, Daniel ^d   Berghold, Andrea ^d   Boehler, Nikolaus ^b   Labek, Gerold ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b KEPLER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Austria)

^c Department of Surgery ^*  (Austria)

^d MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE IMPLANT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; REGISTER; REOPERATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REGISTRIES;

EID: 84921799559     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2014.961119     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Doll R, Hill A B. Lung cancer and other causes of death in relation to smoking; a second report on the mortality of British doctors. Br Med J 1956; 2 (5001): 1071-81.
2. EUROPEAN-COMMISSION. Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on medical devices. http://ec.europa.eu/health/medical-devices/files/revision-docs/proposal-2012-542-en.pdf. 2012. (last accessed June 9th, 2014)
3. Falbrede I, Widmer M, Kurtz S, Schneidmuller D, Dudda M, Roder C. [Utilization rates of lower extremity prostheses in Germany and Switzerland: A comparison of the years 2005-2008]. Orthopaede 2011; 40 (9): 793-801.
4. Godlee F. Serious risks from metal-on-metal hip implants. Br Med J 2012: 344: e1539.
5. Hill A B, Doll R. Lung cancer and tobacco; the B.M.J.'s questions answered. Br Med J 1956; 1 (4976): 1160-3.
6. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007; 89 (4): 780-5.
7. Labek G, Pabinger C, et al. Quality of publications regarding the outcome of revision rate after arthroplasty. EFORT Booklet 2010; (1): 1-36.
8. Labek G, Neumann D, Agreiter M, Schuh R, Böhler M. Impact of implant developers on published outcome and reproducibility of cohort-based clinical studies in arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2011a; 93 Suppl 3: 55-61.
9. Labek G, Sekyra K, Pawelka W, Janda W, Stockl B. Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty registry data. Acta Orthop 2011b; 82 (2): 131-5.
10. Labek G, Thaler M, Janda W, Agreiter M, Stockl B. Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011c; 93 (3): 293-7.
11. NJRA: National Joint Registery Australia, Annual Report 2012 at https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au (last accessed June 9th, 2014)
12. No-authors-listed. European Public Health Outcome Research and Indicators Collection (EUPHORIC) 2008; final report. http:/www.euphoric-project.eu/.../Euphoric-final-report-0.pdf (last accessed June 9th, 2014).
13. OECD Health Data 2013, ISSN: 2074-3963 (online) DOI: 10.1787/healthdata-en. (last accessed June 9th, 2014)
14. Pabinger C, Berghold A, Boehler N, Labek G. Revision rates after knee replacement. Cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012; 21 (2013): 263-8.
15. Peltola M, Malmivaara A, Paavola M. Learning curve for new technology? A nationwide register-based study of 46,363 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2013; 95 (23): 2097-103.
16. SKAR. The Swedish Knee Arthoplasty Register (Sundberg M, Lidgren L, W-Dahl A, Robertsson O). Changes in risk of revision over time. Relative risk of revision for hospitals 2001-2010. Swedish Knee Arthoplasty Register ANNUAL REPORT 2012 - PART II, page 41. 2012: 41. (last accessed June 9th, 2014)
17. Smith A J, Dieppe P, Vernon K, Porter M, Blom A W. Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Lancet 2012; 379 (9822): 1199-204.